Pre-purge notice & cure period

The statute mandates a statutorily-defined notice procedure (mailed within 90 days) and provides an explicit cure mechanism: voters may return a prepaid card to correct their address before removal occurs. The statute further specifies that voters have until after the second general election for federal office to vote or update registration before removal, creating a defined cure period. This satisfies the procedural clarity requirement for pre-purge notice and opportunity to cure.

“the board of registrars or Secretary of State, within 90 days after identifying the potential change, shall send the voter a notice of the change by forwardable mail along with a postage prepaid, pre-addressed return card on which the registered voter may verify or correct his or her current address information”

The statute establishes a clear, multi-layered notice-and-cure procedure before removal: (1) initial notice by nonforwardable mail requesting address confirmation (§15.07.130(a)); (2) if returned, a second notice by forwardable mail warning of inactivation with a 45-day cure window (§15.07.130(b)); (3) inactivation occurs only if no response within 45 days; and (4) final cancellation occurs only after the second general election following inactivation and if the voter remains uncontactive and nonvoting. The notice must include a pre-addressed, postage-paid return card and explicit warnings about consequences. This is exhaustively enumerated in statute, not left to administrative discretion.

The statute establishes a clear, statutory-grounded procedure: provisional rolls are published and voters have a defined 15-day cure period to challenge omissions or errors before an electoral judge, with multiple accessible filing methods (in person, free mail, or web). This provides notice (via publication of provisional rolls) and a defined cure opportunity.

The statute establishes a clear, mandatory notice-and-cure procedure: the county recorder must send a follow-up notice to an elector whose mail is returned undelivered, must provide means to correct registration (online or form), and must allow a 35-day cure period before changing status to inactive. This procedure is codified in statute with specific timelines and enumerated remedial pathways, satisfying the procedural-clarity requirement.

The statute mandates that the county clerk send written notification when a person is removed or purged (subsection a), and explicitly provides a 30-day cure/challenge period after removal (subsection b). Both the notice requirement and the opportunity to cure are grounded in statute, enumerated clearly, and set forth a defined procedure.

Section 118 provides a clear statutory framework requiring notice to the challenged elector and a defined cure period: the elector has up to 20 days after notice of objection to submit an answer before the Electoral Commissioner determines whether to remove them from the roll. The statute also requires written notice of the decision (subsection 6) and establishes enumerated grounds for removal. This satisfies the procedural requirements of statutory grounding, enumeration of grounds, notice, and a defined response opportunity.

“(1) The Electoral Commissioner shall determine an objection as soon as practicable after: (a) the receipt by the Electoral Commissioner of the answer of the challenged elector; or (b) the end of 20 days after the giving of the notice of the objection; whichever is the earlier.”

§ 29(1) NRWO establishes a statutory procedure requiring that the municipality notify affected persons of a correction petition against their voter-roll entry within 24 hours, stating the grounds. It then grants affected persons a four-day window to file written or oral objections with the authority deciding the petition. This satisfies the criterion: notice is statutorily mandated, timing is enumerated, grounds must be disclosed, and a defined cure mechanism (right to object) is provided by statute.

“Die Gemeinde hat die Personen, gegen deren Aufnahme in das Wählerverzeichnis ein Berichtigungsantrag gestellt wurde, hiervon unter gleichzeitiger Bekanntgabe der Gründe innerhalb von 24 Stunden nach Einlangen des Berichtigungsantrages zu verständigen. Den Betroffenen steht es frei, binnen vier Tagen nach Zustellung der Verständigung schriftlich oder mündlich Einwendungen bei der zur Entscheidung über den Berichtigungsantrag berufenen Behörde vorzubringen.”

Чл. 39 codifies the pre-purge notice path: struck-off list published 10 days before election day, with statutory exclusion-request procedure and 24-hour administrative court appeal. Public-internet publication + statutory cure.

The statute requires that notice be sent to the person's address before any removal occurs (subsection 3), and establishes a cure mechanism: if the notice is returned as undeliverable within 20 days, the registration is canceled, but if returned after 20 days, it is merely marked inactive rather than canceled. The notice itself provides an opportunity to decline or correct registration (subsection 3(a) and (b) with postage-paid return forms). This satisfies the requirement of statutory notice and cure period before removal.

The statute establishes a clear, statutorily grounded pre-removal procedure: registrars must send notice by forwardable mail with a postage-paid return card, and the voter has thirty days to respond and verify or correct their address before removal. This is enumerated in the statute and provides a defined cure opportunity before the voter is removed from the active registry list.

The statute establishes a clear, mandatory notice-and-cure procedure: forwardable first-class mail notice must be sent, voters are given 60 days to respond by returning a postage-paid card, and responses trigger specific documented actions (cancellation, address update, or reinstatement to active status). Even if no response is received, voters enter "inactive status" (not immediate removal) and retain voting rights upon affirmation at the polling place, with a further 2-general-election grace period before final removal. All procedures are statutorily enumerated, not left to administrative discretion.

§ 97.073 codifies the pre-purge / disposition notice regime: notification within 5 business days. § 98.065 (REG.5) adds address-confirmation cure period before removal.

“The supervisor must notify each applicant of the disposition of the applicant’s voter registration application within 5 business days after voter registration information is entered into the statewide voter registration system”

The statute explicitly requires notice (inform by any means) and a cure period (48-hour opportunity to present observations) before removal from the rolls. Both elements are set in statute, not left to administrative discretion, and the procedure is enumerated with specific timing.

“La commission de contrôle informe par tout moyen l'électeur concerné de sa volonté de le radier des listes électorales. Ce dernier dispose d'un délai de quarante-huit heures pour présenter ses observations.”

§ 21-2-234 codifies pre-purge confirmation notice (forwardable mail to inactive electors). § 21-2-232 codifies removal procedure. § 21-2-233 codifies USPS NCOA comparison + cure procedure. NVRA-compliant pre-purge notice + 2-cycle wait period codified.

The statute mandates that before removal under subsection (a), the clerk must identify voters via postal database or by mailing notice that receives a postal notation of non-deliverability (subsection b). Subsection (c) then requires the clerk to conduct notification mailings as required by applicable federal law (the NVRA), which provides a cure period. Any person removed may restore their name by presenting to the clerk and reregistering or applying by mail (subsection e). The procedure is set by statute, enumerated, and includes both pre-removal notice and a defined reinstatement mechanism.

The statute clearly requires pre-purge notice (written inquiry specifying the nature of the challenge) and provides a defined cure period (20 days for the elector to respond and cure the issue). It further mandates a hearing before cancellation if the county clerk determines the challenge remains unsatisfied, giving the elector a second opportunity to present evidence. The procedure is statutorily grounded and enumerated, with no reliance on administrative discretion.

10 ILCS 5/4-17 codifies a pre-cancellation mailed notice to voters who haven't voted in 4 years, with a 30-day reinstatement window — a clear NVRA-compliant notice-and-cure procedure.

“cancelled according to law for failure to vote during the last 4 years, unless you apply for reinstatement within 30 days”

The statute explicitly requires that notices be mailed to voters before cancellation and mandates a cure period of at least 30 days after the second general election following notice, during which a voter who responds to the notice can prevent removal. The procedure is grounded in statute and provides a defined, enumerated timeline for both notice and cure opportunity.

Iowa Code § 48A.27(4) establishes a clear statutory procedure for pre-purge notice and cure. When the postal vendor indicates a voter has moved outside the county, the commissioner must mail notice and provide a postage-paid return card allowing the voter to correct address information before the record is made inactive or removed. The statute specifies the notice content, the vehicle for response, and the timeline (fifteen days before an election). This satisfies the procedural-clarity requirement regardless of policy views on purge strictness.

This section establishes a statutory requirement that the county election officer send notice by first-class mail to a voter's current address when an affidavit indicates a change of residence, and directs that voter registration materials be included. This constitutes a statutorily mandated notice-and-opportunity-to-cure procedure: the voter receives notice of the need to reregister and is provided materials to do so, creating an explicit opportunity to cure their registration status before removal.

“Upon receipt of an affidavit of a former precinct resident, the county election officer shall send to the current address specified on the affidavit, by forwardable first-class mail, a notice that it is necessary to reregister to vote. The notice also shall include voter registration materials if the voter is still a resident of the county of the original registration.”

The statute mandates that before any removal action, the registrar must mail an address confirmation notice informing the voter of the need to verify current address, must send it to both the registered and believed-new address, and must wait thirty days for a response. Cure is explicit: the voter may return the signed notice to update registration and avoid removal. Only after this thirty-day cure period elapses with no response does placement on the inactive list occur. Both statutory requirement and enumerated procedure are clear.

The statute establishes a clear statutory procedure requiring public notice (published by 20 May) of voters to be struck from the rolls, with the list deposited for public inspection from 20–30 May, and explicitly provides that citizens may lodge challenges (réclamations) regarding improper removal before a competent judge (juge de paix) under Articles 21 et seq. This satisfies the notice requirement, the cure/challenge opportunity, and the defined appeal path—all grounded in statute.

“Une liste supplémentaire des électeurs nouvellement inscrits est dressée dans la même forme que les listes provisoires. Elle mentionne, par ordre alphabétique, les nom et prénoms des électeurs rayés; elle est déposée à l'inspection du public, concurremment avec les listes provisoires, au secrétariat de la commune, du 20 au 30 mai. Un avis publié dès le 20 mai, dans la forme ordinaire, porte ce dépôt à la connaissance du public. L'avis mentionne que les réclamations du chef d'inscription, radiation ou omission indues doivent être portées devant le juge de paix, conformément aux dispositions des articles 21 et suivants de la présente loi.”

The statute explicitly requires written notice at least 20 days in advance of any hearing regarding voter qualifications, an opportunity for the voter to present evidence and testimony, and a cure mechanism allowing the voter to offer satisfactory proof of qualifications either before or at the hearing to prevent cancellation. The registrar may only cancel registration if the voter fails to offer satisfactory proof after these procedural safeguards.

“If the registrar is in doubt as to the qualifications of a person to vote, the registrar shall fix a reasonable time and place for a hearing and give written notice of the hearing to the voter at the last known address provided by the voter at least 20 days in advance. The voter must have the opportunity to testify and to present witnesses and other evidence at the hearing. The voter may respond in person or in writing with proof of qualifications prior to the date of the hearing.”

Article 26(1) clearly establishes in statute a mandatory pre-purge notice requirement ('Prior to proceeding to the cancellation... the Commission shall by notice in writing') with a defined cure period (ten days to provide requested information). The procedure is enumerated: written notice via registered and ordinary post, a ten-day response window, and a secondary notice before final cancellation if the voter fails to respond. This satisfies the procedural criterion for notice and cure regardless of one's policy views on registration maintenance.

Md. Election Law § 3-504(c)(2) establishes a clear statutory notice requirement and a defined cure period. The section mandates that the election director mail notice by regular U.S. mail to the voter's registered address, stating the reason for proposed removal (Social Security Administration death report) and explicitly preserving the voter's right to object and show cause within 2 weeks. The statute further specifies the director's options upon timely objection, including retention or a hearing, and the automatic removal upon failure to respond timely. All procedural elements—notice, enumerated grounds, cure period, and administrative review path—are set by statute rather than left to discretion.

“the election director shall mail to the address shown on the statewide voter registration list, by regular U.S. mail, a notice that: 1. states that the registered voter has been reported by the Social Security Administration to have died; and 2. notifies the registered voter or a person attending the affairs of a deceased voter that the voter will be removed from the statewide voter registration list unless, within 2 weeks after the date of the letter, the registered voter or a representative: A. objects to the removal; and B. shows cause why the removal should not proceed.”

The statute mandates written notice before removal, with a statutory cure mechanism: voters may respond to the notice or vote in the next two biennial elections to avoid removal. The notice requirements are enumerated in detail (postage-prepaid, preaddressed card, forwardable mail, registration instruction). This satisfies both the notice requirement and the cure period, grounded entirely in statute with specific procedural steps.

“They shall, on or before the first Monday of June in each year, send notice in writing to each voter of the preceding year whose name has not been entered in the annual register of the current year that the name of such voter may be removed from the voting list if the voter fails to respond to the notice and does not vote in the next two biennial state elections following the mailing of such notice. Such notice shall (1) be postage prepaid; (2) contain a preaddressed and postage prepaid return card; (3) be sent by forwardable mail; (4) instruct the voter to return the card before the last day to register if the voter did not change residence from the city or town; and (5) contain additional information about remaining eligible to vote, as prescribed by the state secretary.”

The statute mandates statutory notice (display of cancellation lists May 1–31 in Instituto offices) and a defined cure period (opportunity to request re-inscription during the period for 'campaña intensa' under art. 138), as well as a defined appeal path (challenge procedure under art. 143, paragraph 6). The requirement is enumerated in the statute itself, not left to administrative discretion.

The statute requires forwardable-mail notice with a prepaid return card allowing the elector to verify/correct address, and cancellation only occurs after the elector fails to respond and fails to vote across two federal general elections — a clear statutory notice-and-cure procedure before removal.

The statute requires written notice to voters (with prepaid return card) before removal and provides a cure period: voters can respond to the notice, return the card with their current address, or vote during the specified election period (ending after the second general election following notice). The procedure is enumerated in statute with specific timelines and response mechanisms, allowing voters to cure their status or prevent removal entirely.

“a registered voter's name shall not be removed from the list of registered voters on the ground that the voter has changed residence unless: (1) The voter confirms in writing that the voter has changed residence to a place outside the election authority's jurisdiction in which the voter is registered; or (2) The voter fails to respond to a notice described in this section and has not voted in an election during the period beginning on the date of the notice and ending on the day after the date of the second general election that occurs after the date of the notice. 2. The notice referred to in subsection 1, subdivision (2) of this section shall contain a postage prepaid and preaddressed return card, sent by forwardable mail, on which the voter may state the voter's current address.”

Montana codifies notice-and-cure before removal — § 13-2-220 requires confirmation notices, and an elector is canceled under § 13-2-402(7) only after failing to respond to confirmation mailings, being placed on the inactive list, and then missing two consecutive federal general elections.

“must be followed within 30 days by an appropriate confirmation notice”

The statute explicitly requires that before a voter is removed from the rolls (per subsection 5), a confirmation notice must be mailed with a cure opportunity: the voter may return a confirmation card by the registration deadline or affirm/confirm their address at voting. This notice-and-opportunity-to-cure requirement is set in statute with enumerated procedures (forwardable first-class mail, specific letter contents, preaddressed card, deadline tied to section 32-302). The removal itself occurs only if the voter neither responds nor votes in the next two federal general elections.

This section is set in statute and provides an enumerated, multi-step procedure before cancellation: (1) written notice with a postcard providing an explicit cure mechanism (opportunity to respond with new address), (2) a 30-day response period before inactive designation, and (3) a two-election waiting period before final removal. The statute specifies the means of notice, the opportunity to cure via postcard response, and the temporal sequence. County clerks have no discretion to deviate from these steps; the procedure is mandatory and clearly delineated.

The statute mandates a pre-removal notice ('shall mail') to the voter's last known address, provides a defined 30-day cure period during which a voter may respond, specifies contact information must be included, and establishes clear removal procedures contingent on either expiration of the cure period or confirmation of death. All procedural elements—statutory grounding, enumeration, and cure opportunity—are present.

“they shall mail to the last known address of the voter a 30-day letter specifically for updating the checklist upon the death of a voter. Such letter shall include the contact information for the supervisors of the checklist to which a response may be sent. If there is no response within 30 days, the supervisors will remove that voter's name from the checklist. If there is a response confirming the death within 30 days, the supervisors may remove the voter's name upon receipt of the confirmation of death.”

The statute sets clear, enumerated procedures in law: (1) mandatory notice sent 90–120 days before a general election, (2) a postage-prepaid return card with explicit instructions, (3) a cure period extending from the notice date through the day after the second general election (at least two years), during which a voter may respond or vote to remain registered, and (4) cancellation only after meeting strict conditions (failure to respond and failure to vote during the cure window). All elements are statutory, not discretionary.

§ 5-712 codifies pre-purge confirmation-notice procedure: forwardable first-class mail with return-postage-guaranteed mail to the voter, with statutory 2-federal-election waiting period before removal (NVRA-compliant). § 16-110 codifies judicial review of registration challenges.

“confirmation notice by forwardable first class or return postage guaranteed mail to every registered voter or applicant for registration, at the address”

The statute expressly requires 30 days' written notice before removal for felony convictions and a defined cure period: if the voter objects within 30 days, a formal challenge hearing is triggered rather than automatic removal. The notice-and-cure procedure is statutorily grounded, enumerated (30 days specified), and accompanied by an appeal path (challenge hearing under G.S. 163-85(c)(5)). The change-of-address provision similarly provides a postage-prepaid confirmation mailing with a deadline to respond before removal occurs.

§ 2-9 codifies that 'if the voter roll is changed after a request for correction, or after the election board has become aware of errors, the election board shall promptly notify the affected persons of the change' (Hvis manntallet blir endret etter krav om retting, eller etter at valgstyret er blitt oppmerksom på feil, skal valgstyret snarest gi melding om endringen til de personene det gjelder). Pre-change notice codified.

“Hvis manntallet blir endret etter krav om retting, eller etter at valgstyret er blitt oppmerksom på feil, skal valgstyret snarest gi melding om endringen til de personene det gjelder.”

ORC 3503.21 codifies the pre-cancellation notice path for inactivity-based cancellation: 'after having been mailed a confirmation notice' + failure to respond and vote within 4 consecutive years.

§ 1901 codifies the voter removal program under NVRA, which mandates pre-removal confirmation notice with opportunity to cure (NVRA-compliance requirement).

The statute provides a clear, enumerated pre-removal procedure: confirmation cards are mailed to trigger the cure period (during which the voter may vote or appear to vote to retain registration), and cancellation occurs only if the voter fails to respond within a defined timeframe (after the second general election following the mailing). The statute further mandates written notice of cancellation to the voter's last known address, creating both notice and an implicit opportunity to correct the record by re-registering. Both procedural elements—statutory grounding and defined cure opportunity—are satisfied.

MP Election Law Article 17 codifies pre-purge notice: when the list-keeping authority finds an entry for a deceased person or someone who has moved, it must issue a decision (решење), which is delivered to the person if their new residence is known, or otherwise publicly posted in the previous residence. Inter-municipal notification is also required.

“О брисању лица из става 1. овог члана доноси се решење.”

The statute mandates that removal on grounds of changed residence cannot occur without first sending a notice (a postage-prepaid, preaddressed return card) and providing a cure period. The elector must either confirm the change in writing or be given an extended opportunity to vote (through two general elections) to affirm their address. This establishes both a statutory notice requirement and a defined cure mechanism before removal.

“The State Election Commission may not remove the name of a qualified elector from the official list of eligible voters on the ground that the qualified elector has changed residence unless the qualified elector: (a) confirms in writing that the qualified elector has changed residence to a place outside the county in which the qualified elector is registered; or (b)(i) has failed to respond to a notice described in item (2); and (ii) has not voted or appeared to vote and, if necessary, correct the county board of voter registration and elections record of the qualified elector's address, in an election during the period beginning on the date of the notice and ending on the day after the date of the second general election that occurs after the date of the notice.”

§ 12-4-19.1 codifies the confirmation mailing notice: 'double postcard stating that the voter's registration may be canceled if the card is not returned.' § 12-4-19.7 codifies content. § 12-4-40 codifies duplicate-registration notification. § 12-4-9.2 codifies secured-active designation. NVRA-compliant pre-purge notice + 2-cycle wait period codified.

The statute requires mandatory pre-purge notice via forwardable confirmation notice mailed to the voter's registered address, with a prepaid return form allowing the voter to respond. The statute then enumerates specific cure outcomes based on voter response or non-response, including a defined period (up to the second regular November election following notice) during which non-responsive voters may still vote via affidavit if they appear at their polling place. This provides both clear statutory notice requirement and a defined cure/opportunity-to-respond procedure.

“If, as a result of the address verification program, the county election commission determines that a voter may have changed the voter's address of residence, the administrator of elections shall mail a forwardable confirmation notice to the voter at the address of registration with a postage prepaid, pre-addressed return form on which the voter may verify or correct the new address information. Upon the mailing of a notice pursuant to subsection (c), the administrator of elections shall place the registration in inactive status and then take one (1) of the following steps as appropriate to the response of the voter or the failure of the voter to respond to the notice: If the voter returns the form or otherwise notifies the election commission in writing and indicates that there is in fact no change in address, the voter's registration will be returned to active status”

§ 16.0332 codifies a pre-purge notice-and-cure procedure: before cancelling a registration for a citizenship-status discrepancy, the registrar must deliver written notice requiring proof of citizenship, and only 'if a voter fails to submit to the registrar proof of citizenship on or before the 30th day after the date the notice is mailed' may the registrar cancel. § 15.052 codifies the parallel 30-day confirmation-notice cure. Notice-and-opportunity-to-cure codified.

“If a voter fails to submit to the registrar proof of citizenship on or before the 30th day after the date the notice is mailed, the registrar shall cancel the voter's registration.”

52 USC § 20507(d) codifies the NVRA pre-removal procedure: confirmation notice + 2-election waiting period before a voter may be removed for residence change. Federal statutory pre-purge notice + cure period.

The statute requires county clerks to send a written notice by mail within 31 days when address changes are detected, and establishes a clear cure period: voters can prevent removal by either confirming residence changes in writing or by voting during a specified window (from notice through the second regular general election after notice) and responding to the notice. The removal procedure is entirely statutorily grounded with enumerated timelines and required notice form specified in detail.

§ 2150 codifies a notice-and-cure framework before removal: a voter is sent a confirmation notice, and § 2152 places a voter who fails to respond into the inactive section of the checklist rather than removing them outright — the NVRA notice-and-waiting-period model. Notice and an opportunity to remain registered are codified.

The statute clearly establishes a mandatory pre-purge notice requirement and a defined cure/appeal opportunity: affected voters must receive written notice by mail of the grounds for cancellation, the specific facts, and the date/time of a hearing where they can present testimony to defend their registration status. The hearing must occur at least ten days after mailing, providing a definite opportunity to be heard before removal. This satisfies the statutory grounding, enumeration, and cure-procedure elements of the criterion.

“the general registrar shall send a notice by mail to the last known address of each registered voter on the list, stating the reasons provided by law for the cancellation, the facts on which the cancellation is based, and when the registrar, at his office during regular office hours, will hear testimony produced for or against the right of persons named in the notice to be retained on the registration records. The hearings shall be held not less than ten days after the mailing of the notice”

The statute clearly requires written notice by certified mail before removal and provides a defined cure period of thirty days during which the voter may appear in person and present evidence of eligibility to prevent cancellation. Both procedural elements—notice and opportunity to cure—are explicitly mandated in the statutory text with specific timelines and methods.

“Upon the receipt of a challenge, the clerk of the county commission shall mail a notice of challenge to the registrant, setting forth that the voter's registration will be canceled if the voter does not appear in person during business hours at the clerk's office within a period of thirty days from the mailing of the notice and present evidence of his or her eligibility.”

The statute requires written notice of refusal to recognize voter status and provides a 30-day cure/appeal window to challenge the decision before the Foreign Affairs Minister. However, the text does not explicitly address the procedure for removal from rolls or purge of enrolled voters; it covers only refusal at initial registration. The cure mechanism applies to rejection of new registration rather than a pre-purge notice before removal of already-registered voters, leaving the latter procedure undefined.

The statute requires notice ('unverzüglich zu unterrichten') and establishes a statutory appeal process ('Einspruch einlegen' with reference to § 22 procedures), satisfying the notice and review elements. However, the text does not explicitly establish a pre-removal cure period—i.e., an opportunity for the voter to correct or remedy eligibility issues before removal is final. The appeal is post-removal, not pre-removal prevention. This satisfies notice and appeal but not a prospective cure opportunity.

“Gibt eine Gemeindebehörde einem Eintragungsantrag nicht statt oder streicht sie eine in das Wählerverzeichnis eingetragene Person, hat sie den Betroffenen unverzüglich zu unterrichten. Gegen die Entscheidung kann der Betroffene Einspruch einlegen; er ist auf diese Möglichkeit hinzuweisen.”

ΠΔ 26/2012 Άρθρο 13 covers criminal-disqualification roll-deletion notice indirectly via the bi-monthly Ministry-of-Interior list flow; a specific pre-purge notice-and-cure provision was not surfaced.

The statute provides a clear, defined cure procedure: voters may lodge a written complaint with the electoral board up to 2 weeks before election day, with written notice required from the board of any removal and right to appeal to the Electoral Commission within 2 working days. However, the text does not establish a requirement that the electoral board provide advance notice to a voter BEFORE removing them from the rolls; it only requires notice after removal has occurred and provides a post-removal appeal mechanism. True pre-purge notice (proactive notification that a voter is at risk of removal, with opportunity to cure before removal) is not explicitly required by this language.

KRS 116.112 codifies a voter-registration purge program with an 'inactive voter list' built from USPS change-of-address data — the NVRA notice-and-waiting-period framework under which a voter is moved to the inactive list (rather than removed outright) and removed only after the statutory inactive period. KRS 116.114 adds an online report and a citizen anomaly-reporting method. A notice-and-cure framework is codified through the inactive-list mechanism.

Article 37 establishes a statutory notice requirement: the provisional electoral list is posted (avis de dépôt) at the Fokontany level and transmitted to the local census commission for verification by voters themselves. This provides notice and an opportunity to challenge one's status. However, the statute does not explicitly enumerate a defined cure procedure (e.g., what specific actions a voter must take, within what timeframe, to remedy an erroneous removal), nor does it clearly specify an appeal or review path if a voter's objection is rejected. The procedure is partially procedurally clear but incomplete.

The statute provides statutory notice and a 10-day cure period, but only for the narrow scenario of duplicate registrations with identical dates. For other removal scenarios (e.g., death, loss of eligibility), subsection 4 permits roll alterations whenever 'circumstances or conditions' change, without specifying advance notice, cure rights, or appeal mechanisms—leaving those critical procedural elements to administrative discretion. The criterion requires pre-purge notice and cure as a general rule; this section provides it only for duplicates.

“Si las inscripciones tienen la misma fecha, se notificará al afectado esta circunstancia para que opte por una de ellas en el plazo de diez días.”

4 kap. 18 § codifies that 'the county administrative board's decision on polling-district division shall be issued no later than December 1 of the year before the year in which the decision is first applied.' Pre-purge / pre-change notice via fixed publication date codified. 4 kap. 19 § codifies regional/municipal change-decision procedure.

Art. I-44 codifies amendments to updated voter lists (the standard pre-purge correction window). Art. IV-281 codifies repeat-voting deadlines. Statutory amendment-window for voter-list corrections exists in this Code but specific pre-purge notice + cure period for inactive-voter removal is in the State Voter Register Law (separate instrument).

The statute provides statutory notice and a defined cure period (reregistration/address update until 8 p.m. election day) specifically for address-based challenges under RCW 29A.08.810(1)(c). However, for other grounds of challenge under subsection (1)(a), (b), (d), or (e)—where registration cancellation occurs without ballot counting—no cure procedure is provided; the voter receives notice but no opportunity to remedy the defect before removal. This creates an asymmetrical framework where some removal scenarios have cure rights and others do not.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Same Article 45 mismatch — not roll-purge notice. AM has continuous Register sync without pre-purge notice procedure.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 70 (cancellation of nominations) — wrong target. No pre-purge notice procedure codified for voter rolls.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section regulates electoral propaganda on the internet (candidate websites, party sites, social media, etc.) and does not address voter registration, voter roll purges, or any notice-and-cure procedures related to voter removal. The criterion concerns pre-purge notice and cure periods for voters — an entirely different subject matter from internet campaign advertising.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 77 addresses postponement of elections following the death of a nominated candidate and establishes procedures for rescheduling nominations and polling. It does not address voter roll maintenance, purges, or any notice-and-cure procedures for voters at risk of removal from the electoral lists. The section is entirely inapplicable to REG.6, which concerns pre-purge voter notification.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section § 59c addresses voting location procedures for voters with valid documentation or notification of voting elsewhere—it does not concern voter registration purges, removal procedures, notice requirements, or cure periods. The criterion requires statutory provisions governing pre-purge notice and cure rights; this section contains no such provisions.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Estonia's voter roll is generated automatically from the population register; the surfaced § 20 list-of-voters provision codifies exclusion criteria but no notice-and-opportunity-to-cure before removal — a voter wrongly excluded uses the post-hoc administrative-court correction route.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

Article 31 codifies voter-list formation; Article 14 codifies CEC duties. Specific pre-purge notice-and-cure procedure not directly surfaced — but voter-list public posting under Article 34 provides the de facto notice + cure window.

Article 33 provides an appeal mechanism after a removal decision (post-purge review path), but does not establish a pre-purge notice or opportunity to cure before removal occurs. The criterion requires notice and cure opportunity before removal; this section addresses only post-removal appeal. The substantive pre-purge procedure is referenced as Article 32, which is not provided for evaluation.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses removal of the chief executive of an electoral commission from office—an internal administrative personnel matter—not removal of voters from electoral rolls. It concerns governance of the commission itself, not voter registration procedures. The criterion REG.6 evaluates whether voters receive statutory notice and cure opportunities before purge from voter rolls; this section has no relevance to that topic.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses vote-counting procedures at polling stations (ballot handling, counting methodology, validation of ballots, and dispute resolution), not voter registration or roll maintenance. It contains no provisions regarding voter purges, pre-purge notice, cure periods, or removal from voting rolls. The criterion REG.6 concerns registration administration; this section is procedurally irrelevant to that topic.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: No notice-and-cure-before-removal provision is codified in the ingested election acts; voter-roll maintenance is governed by the separate Electoral Register Law.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Lithuania's voter list is updated automatically from the Population Register (§ 32, § 34) — voters are added or removed on changes recorded in the Register; a discrete pre-removal notice-and-cure period for inactivity is not codified.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The statute sets out the times when commissioners shall meet to revise registration books and erase names of persons 'erroneously on the books, or who have died, removed or become disqualified,' but it contains no requirement for pre-removal notice to affected voters or any opportunity to cure before erasure. The section explicitly permits erasure based on death, removal of residence, and disqualification with no cure mechanism described.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the procedural requirements for electoral competitors, referendum participants, and initiative groups to establish and manage designated bank accounts for campaign financing. It contains no provisions regarding voter registration, voter roll purges, notice requirements, or cure periods for voters facing removal from the electoral rolls. The criterion concerns voter roll management procedures; this section concerns campaign finance account administration.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section (Kieswet art. V 3) governs the documentation and verification requirements that candidates must submit when accepting nomination for elected office—specifically regarding public positions held, residency, birth records, citizenship, and EU membership status. It does not address voter registration management, voter removal from rolls, pre-purge notice procedures, or cure periods for voters. The criterion concerns procedural protections for voters facing removal from the electoral roll; this section concerns candidate eligibility verification during the nomination process. These are distinct regulatory domains.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section governs the membership, organization, and operation of county political party committees—including election of committee members, officer duties, vacancy procedures, and certification requirements. It contains no provisions whatsoever regarding voter registration, voter roll maintenance, purging of registered voters, notice procedures before removal, or cure periods. The criterion asks about pre-purge notice and opportunity to cure for voters being removed from rolls; this statute addresses party committee internal governance only.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses voluntary cancellation initiated by the voter themselves, not involuntary purges by election officials. REG.6 asks whether statute requires notice and cure opportunity before a voter is removed from rolls by administrative action (e.g., due to address changes, duplicate registrations, or death records). § 26-4-120.1 does not establish a pre-purge notice requirement or cure period for involuntary removals; it only governs the voter's own election to cancel their registration. The criterion is not satisfied because the procedure described does not mandate that officials provide notice to voters facing removal and allow them to cure.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: ORS § 260.695 is a section on prohibitions relating to voting (ballot imitation, electioneering, obstruction, fraud, ballot secrecy, etc.). It contains no provisions addressing voter registration purges, notice requirements, or cure procedures for removal from rolls. The criterion requires statutory specification of pre-purge notice and opportunity to cure; this section does not address registration maintenance or purge procedures at all.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 95 addresses electoral committee registration (specifically naming disputes and cure procedures for committee names), not voter roll maintenance or pre-purge notice and cure procedures for individual voters. The statute provides cure mechanisms for electoral committees but contains no procedural requirements for notice and opportunity to cure before voter removal from rolls.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 38.º governs the designation and challenge of polling station officials (mesa members), not voter registration or purges. It establishes a procedure for challenging the appointment of election officials and provides for administrative review by the municipal council president, but contains no provisions regarding voter registration maintenance, notice of removal from rolls, or cure procedures for voters facing purge.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

Article 30 (commissions openness) provides general transparency. Article 69 codifies protocol-handling. No specific pre-purge notice-and-cure procedure codified — Russia's automatic GAS Vybory system handles purges without individual notice.

Section 15 provides a statutory objection mechanism through which voters can challenge their exclusion from the roll, but it does not establish a pre-purge notice-and-opportunity-to-cure procedure initiated by the electoral authority before removal occurs. The section addresses post-hoc objections to exclusions already made, not advance notice to a voter about imminent removal with time to correct their registration before deletion. The criterion requires that the voter receive notice and cure opportunity before removal; this section only guarantees a remedy after exclusion has occurred.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: No candidate codifies a pre-purge notice-and-cure procedure. Turkish voter-register maintenance is automatic via civil-registry sync — voters aren't notified before removal because removal is mechanically tied to civil-registry events (death, address change, judicial restriction).

Sub-paragraph 5(c) requires the registration officer to give notice before removal in the proxy-voting context when there is a material change of circumstances, satisfying the notice element. However, the statute does not provide an enumerated cure period or defined opportunity for the voter to respond and correct the record before removal occurs in most removal scenarios (5(a), 5(b), 5(ca), 5(d)). The notice requirement in 5(c) is narrow and does not extend systematically to all removal categories, leaving significant gaps in pre-purge procedural protection.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This statute addresses director vacancies in irrigation districts, not voter registration or purge procedures. It establishes grounds for declaring a director's office vacant (e.g., resignation, failure to attend meetings, death) but contains no provisions regarding voter registration lists, removal of voters from rolls, notice requirements, or cure periods. The section is entirely outside the scope of voter registration administration.