TrustVotingAtlas
Countrylu

Luxembourg

Election framework scored across 6 methodologies, sourced to 1 primary instruments and 345 statute sections.

Overall20.8%EAdI 5.9%EAI 37.0%ECI 11.1%EDRI 36.4%EVCI 41.7%EII 15.1%

Methodology Radar

Dimension Breakdown

EAdI5.9%
Election Administration Index
Accountability50%
Commission0%
Funding0%
Staff Training0%
Vendor Oversight0%
EAI37.0%
Electoral Access Index
Administration0%
Eligibility20%
Identification40%
Registration71%
Roll Integrity0%
Voter Assistance33%
Voting Methods20%
ECI11.1%
Election Campaign-Finance Index
Contributions0%
Disclosure0%
Enforcement50%
Foreign Source0%
Traceability0%
EDRI36.4%
Election Dispute Resolution Index
Contest40%
Recount13%
Timing75%
EVCI41.7%
Election Voter-Confidence Index
Ballot Info25%
Candidate50%
Notification50%
EII15.1%
Election Integrity Index
Citizen Verifiability13%
Custody Hardware25%
Post Election Audit0%
Software Verifiability0%
Transparency Observation13%
Vendor Independence0%
Voter Access57%

Primary Instruments

CitationTypeTitleSectionsStatus
Loi du 18 février 2003StatuteLoi électorale345active

Methodologies — Datapoint Drill-In

Each methodology card above takes you to Luxembourg's scoring detail for that methodology — every datapoint, with rationale and the exact statute that justifies the score.

EAdIEAIECIEDRIEVCIEII
For a single datapoint side-by-side across every jurisdiction, see e.g. /atlas/datapoint/1.1.
Get notifiedWhen your jurisdiction is added to the atlas, rescored, or has new attack-surface analysis published.
We store your email to send these updates. We don't share it. Unsubscribe link in every message.
Adopt Luxembourg →Spot a gap, an outdated quote, or a statute we missed? Help us improve this jurisdiction.You'll be credited as a contributor