Disclosure threshold in statute

The section explicitly defines the disclosure threshold in statutory text at § 17-5-8(d)(2): contributions aggregating more than $100 from any person must be reported, with full identification, amount, and date. This threshold is enumerated in the statute itself, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion. The requirement is unambiguous and directly codified.

“The identification of each person who has made contributions to the committee or candidate within the calendar year in an aggregate amount greater than one hundred dollars ($100), together with the amount and date of all the contributions”

The statute explicitly codifies multiple disclosure thresholds directly in the law: $50 in aggregate for candidates' contributor occupation/employer disclosure, $100 in aggregate for group contributions, $250 in aggregate for nongroup entity contributor occupation/employer, and $500 annual exemption for independent expenditures. These thresholds are defined in statute, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion.

“for contributions in excess of $50 in the aggregate during a calendar year, the principal occupation and employer of the contributor”

The section explicitly defines multiple disclosure thresholds in statutory text: $50,000 for statewide campaigns, $25,000 for other campaigns (initial reports), and $5,000+ for individual donor identification. These are codified dollar amounts, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion. The thresholds are enumerated with specificity and broken down by campaign type.

“Within five days after first spending monies or accepting in-kind contributions totaling $50,000 or more during an election cycle on campaign media spending in statewide campaigns or $25,000 or more during the election cycle in any other type of campaigns”

Arkansas Code § 7-6-208(b)(1)(B) explicitly defines in statute the disclosure threshold for contributions: contributors whose aggregate contributions exceed $200 must be named and identified. This is a clear statutory requirement with no delegation to regulation or administrative discretion.

§ 9 (4a) PartG explicitly codifies two distinct disclosure thresholds in statutory text: €5,000 per calendar year for member contributions and €500 per year per donor for donations. These thresholds are enumerated with precision regarding what must be reported (names, postal codes/business addresses) and to which organizational entities donations must be attributed. The thresholds are not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion.

“Mitgliedsbeiträge an eine politische Partei und ihre Gliederungen oder an eine nahestehende Organisation oder an ein Personenkomitee ab einem Betrag von € 5.000,- pro Kalenderjahr unter Nennung des Namens des Mitgliedes und der Höhe des Beitrages, 2. den jeweiligen Ertrag (Absatz 4 Z 4) einer nahestehenden Organisation oder eines Personenkomitees unter Nennung des jeweiligen Namens der nahestehenden Organisation oder des Personenkomitees und 3. Erträge aus Geldspenden (§ 2 Z 5), Spenden in Form von lebenden Subventionen (§ 2 Z 5) und Spenden in Form von Sachleistungen (§ 2 Z 5) ab einem Gesamtwert der Spende von € 500,- pro Jahr und Spender”

Section 477.59(2)(h) explicitly codifies in statute the disclosure threshold of $200, above which a contributor's identity and contribution amounts must be reported. The threshold is defined directly in the statutory text rather than delegated to regulation, and applies to all contributions above that amount.

“the name and address of each contributor who made contributions of a total amount of more than $200 to the candidate, that total amount, as well as the amount of each of those contributions and the date on which the candidate received it”

The statute explicitly defines two disclosure thresholds in statutory text: (1) $1,000 for independent expenditure registration and reporting, and (2) $250 for donor-name disclosure. Both are enumerated directly in C.R.S. § 1-45-107.5(3)(a) and (4)(b), establishing clear statutory rather than regulatory authority for the disclosure obligation.

Section 9-608(b)(1) explicitly defines in statute that disclosure filing requirements do not apply until a committee receives or expends an amount in excess of one thousand dollars. This establishes the disclosure threshold directly in the statute rather than delegating it to regulation or administrative discretion, satisfying the statutory-grounding requirement for procedural clarity.

“A candidate committee or political committee formed for a single primary or election until such committee receives or expends an amount in excess of one thousand dollars for purposes of the primary or election for which such committee was formed”

§ 8030(d)(2) explicitly defines the disclosure threshold of $100 in statute for contributions from individuals. The section also specifies additional thresholds ($50 for debts and certain receipts, $100 for expenditures and in-kind contributions), all codified without delegation to regulation. This satisfies the criterion's requirement that the threshold be statutorily grounded.

“each person who has made contributions to such political committee (including the purchase of tickets for events such as dinners, luncheons, rallies and similar fund-raising events, whether or not the tickets were used by the person who paid for them) during the election period in an aggregate amount or value in excess of $100”

§ 12¹ of the Political Parties Act sets the disclosure regime entirely in statute — a political party must ensure complete transparency of revenue and expenditure, and § 12¹(7) requires every donation to be reported regardless of amount, so disclosure applies from the first euro rather than above a threshold.

“A political party must, in accordance with the principle of democracy, ensure the lawfulness and complete transparency of its revenue and expenditure at least in the manner prescribed in this chapter.”

§ 106.35 + § 106.19 (5101) codify disclosure thresholds tied to public-financing eligibility and violation penalties.

“The division shall review each request for contributions from the 1 Election Campaign Financing Trust Fund and certify whether the candidate is eligible for such contributions.”

§ PartG § 24(8) explicitly defines in statute the disclosure threshold of €3,300 for individual contributions, requiring separate reporting of contributions up to and above that amount. This establishes a clear, statutorily-grounded disclosure requirement with enumerated thresholds.

“Im Rechenschaftsbericht sind die Summe der Zuwendungen natürlicher Personen bis zu 3 300 Euro je Person sowie die Summe der Zuwendungen natürlicher Personen, soweit sie den Betrag von 3 300 Euro übersteigen, gesondert auszuweisen.”

The statute explicitly defines the disclosure threshold at $100 for contributors to noncandidate committees in the statutory text itself (subsection (b)(1)), with additional thresholds specified for other categories ($10,000 for certain entity contributions, $500 for late contributions). The threshold is codified in statute, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion.

“the name, address, occupation, and employer of each contributor making a contribution aggregating more than $100 during an election period”

The statute explicitly defines a disclosure threshold of 300,000 ISK above which individual contributors' names must be published. This threshold is codified directly in statute rather than delegated to regulation or administrative discretion, providing clear procedural grounding for the disclosure requirement.

“Einnig skal birta nöfn einstaklinga sem veitt hafa framlög sem eru metin á meira en 300.000 kr.”

The section explicitly defines two statutory disclosure thresholds: $500 for candidates for judicial/local office and political committees designated to support/oppose specific candidates or measures, and $1,000 for undesignated political committees. These thresholds are codified directly in statute rather than left to regulation or administrative discretion.

“is exempt from filing reports under section 67-6607, Idaho Code, unless and until such time as the candidate receives contributions or expends funds in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500) or more”

10 ILCS 5/9-11(a) codifies a $150 aggregate disclosure threshold for contributors (per reporting period) and a $500 threshold above which the contributor's occupation and employer must also be reported.

“in an aggregate amount or value in excess of $150”

The statute explicitly defines disclosure thresholds in statutory text for all categories of committees and candidates ($25 for most categories, $200 for state statutory political committees, $50 for county statutory political committees). The thresholds are enumerated exhaustively by candidate/committee type with specific dollar amounts codified directly in the statute. No administrative discretion or regulation is required to determine when disclosure is triggered.

The section establishes a specific, statutorily-defined disclosure threshold of €100 for donations received by political parties from outside the State. The threshold is explicit in the statutory text rather than delegated to regulation or administrative discretion, and applies to both cash and in-kind donations.

“indicating the value of each donation received by the political party from outside the State (if any), whether in cash or in kind, exceeding €100 in value”

K.S.A. 25-4148(b)(2) explicitly defines the disclosure threshold in statute as $50 for contributions. The requirement is enumerated with specificity regarding what must be reported (name, address, amount, date) and applies to aggregate contributions exceeding that amount. No regulatory discretion is invoked to set the threshold.

“the name and address of each person who has made one or more contributions in an aggregate amount or value in excess of $50 during the election period together with the amount and date of such contributions”

§ 9 of the Law on Financing of Political Organisations requires the financial and economic activities of parties to be transparent and publicly available — a statutory disclosure regime applying to all party finance rather than above a threshold.

“The financial and economic activities of political organisations (parties) shall be transparent and publicly available.”

The statute explicitly defines the disclosure threshold at $5,000 for contributions and expenditures for candidates for non-major offices, and requires all candidates for major or district offices to file without threshold. The threshold is codified directly in statute, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion.

The section explicitly defines the disclosure threshold in statute at $10 for contributions requiring name, address, and date reporting. Additionally, it establishes a $50 aggregation threshold for requiring occupational and business information (§ 1016(3)(B)). Both thresholds are codified in the statutory text itself, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion.

“A person who receives a contribution in excess of $10 for a candidate or a political committee shall report to the candidate or treasurer the amount of the contribution, the name and address of the person making the contribution and the date on which the contribution was received.”

Article 38(3) explicitly defines the disclosure threshold in statute as €7,000 for individual donations or aggregated benefits from the same source within a calendar year. The threshold is enumerated with precision, leaving no discretion to regulation or administrative interpretation.

“A donation shall be reported with reference to its source: (a) if it is a donation of more than seven thousand euro (€7,000); or (b) if, when it is added to any other benefit or benefits, the aggregate amount exceeds seven thousand euro (€7,000), from the same source, in one calendar year.”

The statute explicitly defines disclosure thresholds for small-denomination raffle and chance contributions: individual spins/chances capped at $2, net income per event capped at $1,500, and total election receipts capped at $2,500. Below these thresholds, individual contributors need not be identified; above them, identification is required. The thresholds are enumerated in statute, not delegated to regulation.

“a political committee may accept contributions received from the sale of a spin or chance or a raffle ticket, and need not identify the individual contributor on its campaign finance reports, if: (1) the account book of the political committee includes: (i) the net amount received by the political committee from the raffle, spin, or chance at the fundraising event at which the sale was made; and (ii) the name and address of each person who attended the event; (2) no spin or chance is sold at the event for more than $2; (3) the net income of the sponsoring political committee from spins and chances at the event does not exceed $1,500 in a 24–hour period; (4) the total receipts of the sponsoring political committee from spins and chances in that election do not exceed $2,500”

The statute explicitly defines disclosure thresholds in statutory language: $50 per contribution triggers reporting of contributor identity and contribution details; contributions under $50 are reported only if the aggregate from that contributor exceeds $50 in the reporting period. Additionally, the statute sets a $200 annual threshold for occupation and employer reporting. These thresholds are codified directly in statute rather than delegated to regulation or administrative discretion.

“the full name and residential address of each person who has made a contribution, in an amount or value in excess of fifty dollars in a reporting period, and such information for each contribution of less than or equal to the sum of fifty dollars, if the aggregate of all contributions received from such contributor within said reporting period is in excess of fifty dollars”

The statute defines specific dollar thresholds ($200, $500, $2,500) for late contribution reporting directly in statute, satisfying the requirement that disclosure thresholds be statutorily defined.

The statute explicitly codifies the disclosure threshold at $200.00 aggregate per calendar year. The threshold is enumerated in the statute itself (not delegated to regulation), with clear identification requirements tied to that specific dollar amount across multiple reporting contexts (candidates, political committees, and political parties).

The statute explicitly defines the disclosure threshold as one hundred dollars in the context of itemized contribution reporting. This threshold is codified directly in the statute (RSMo § 130.041(3)(e)), not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion. The requirement applies to all contributions aggregating more than one hundred dollars and specifies exactly what information must be disclosed (name, address, employer/occupation, date, amount).

“A separate listing by name and address and employer, or occupation if self-employed or notation of retirement, of each person from whom the committee received contributions, in money or any other thing of value, aggregating more than one hundred dollars, together with the date and amount of each such contribution”

Montana sets contribution-disclosure thresholds in statute — reports itemize each contributor of $50 or more for candidates and committees (§ 13-37-229) and $35 or more for minor-party petition reporting (§ 13-37-605).

“each person who has made aggregate contributions of $35 or more”

The section explicitly defines in statute the disclosure threshold for late contributions as $1,000 or more. This threshold is enumerated directly in the statutory text (§ 49-1458(5)), not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion. The definition is clear and unambiguous.

“For purposes of this section, late contribution means a contribution of one thousand dollars or more received after the closing date for campaign statements as provided in subdivision (1)(b) of section 49-1459”

The statute explicitly sets the disclosure threshold at €1,000 in Section 1(b), stating that political parties must report contributions of €1,000 or more received in a calendar year. This threshold is directly codified in the statute itself rather than delegated to regulation or administrative discretion.

“een overzicht van de bijdragen van in totaal € 1.000 of meer die de partij in dat kalenderjaar van een gever heeft ontvangen”

The statute explicitly defines the disclosure threshold for in-kind contributions at $100 in subsection 1(a), and alternatively by cumulative amount in 1(b). The threshold is codified directly in the statute (NRS § 294A.362), not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion. This satisfies the procedural requirement that disclosure thresholds be statutorily grounded.

The section explicitly defines in statute the disclosure threshold at $1,000 for political committee filing requirements. It further specifies that contributions of $50 or less need not be itemized with personal information, and contributions exceeding $200 require occupation and employer disclosure. These thresholds are all statutorily grounded rather than delegated to regulatory or administrative discretion.

“Any political committee whose receipts or expenditures exceed $1,000 in an election cycle shall file with the secretary of state an itemized statement, in the form prescribed by the secretary of state, signed by its chairman and treasurer.”

The section explicitly defines the disclosure threshold in statute as $200 for public solicitations, with clear language that itemized reports must be filed when net proceeds exceed this amount. The threshold is codified directly in the statute itself, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion, satisfying the statutory grounding requirement for procedural clarity.

“there shall be filed with such report and as a part thereof an itemized report on any such solicitation of which the net proceeds exceed $200, in such form and detail as required by the rules of the Election Law Enforcement Commission”

The statute explicitly defines two disclosure thresholds in codified law: $100 for independent expenditures and contributions by certain entities, and $5,000 for independent expenditures and $1,000 for donations within 48 hours of an election. These numeric thresholds are grounded directly in statute, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion, satisfying the core procedural requirement.

“In the event an individual, person, or other entity making independent expenditures but not otherwise required to report them makes independent expenditures in excess of one hundred dollars ($100.00), that individual, person, or entity shall file a statement of such independent expenditure with the appropriate board of elections in the manner prescribed by the State Board of Elections. Any person or entity other than an individual that is permitted to make contributions but is not otherwise required to report them shall report each contribution in excess of one hundred dollars ($100.00) with the appropriate board of elections in the manner prescribed by the State Board of Elections.”

§ 16.1-08.1-02.3 codifies the statutory itemized-disclosure threshold of $200 aggregate per reporting period for candidates / candidate committees / multicandidate committees / non-statewide political parties. § 16.1-08.1-02.4 codifies parallel for statewide political parties. § 16.1-08.1-06.2 codifies CPI-indexed adjustment by Secretary of State (annual $10 threshold change). Disclosure threshold statutorily codified.

“For each aggregated contribution from a contributor which totals in excess of two hundred dollars received during the reporting period:”

ORC 3517.105 codifies in-statute thresholds for independent-expenditure source-identification: $100 local, $250 legislative, $500 statewide.

The section explicitly establishes the disclosure threshold in statutory text: contributions in excess of $1,000 in the aggregate must be reported. The threshold is numerically defined and applies to candidate committees, meeting the requirement that the disclosure threshold be codified in statute rather than left to regulation or administrative discretion.

The section statutorily defines a disclosure threshold of $5,000: candidates and committees below that amount may file a simplified certificate and are exempt from detailed disclosure statements (ORS 260.057). Once contributions or expenditures exceed $5,000, full disclosure statements must be filed within seven days. The threshold is enumerated in the statute itself, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion.

§ 1626(a) codifies statutory disclosure thresholds: full report required at >$250 receipts/expenditures, sworn statement at $250 or less; § 1626(b)(1)-(2) codifies the $250/$50 contributor-identity disclosure tiers in statute.

“two hundred fifty dollars ($250)”

The statute explicitly defines the disclosure threshold for contributions at $100 per calendar year, codified directly in § 17-25-11. This is a clear, enumerated statutory threshold, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion. The threshold applies consistently across candidates, political party committees, and political action committees.

“The name and address and place of employment of each person from whom contributions in excess of a total of one hundred dollars ($100) within a calendar year were received”

The statute explicitly defines the disclosure threshold at $100 for individual contributor identification in subsection (F)(2). Additionally, subsection (A) establishes a $500 aggregate threshold for triggering initial filing requirements. These thresholds are codified directly in the statute, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion.

“the name and address of each person making a contribution of more than one hundred dollars and the amount and date of receipt of each contribution”

The statute explicitly codifies a $100 disclosure threshold for contributions in subsection (a)(2)(A). The threshold is enumerated in the statutory text itself, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion. This satisfies the core requirement of DISC.1: the threshold is statutorily defined.

“a list of all the contributions received, including the full name, complete address, occupation, and employer of each person who contributed a total amount of more than one hundred dollars ($100) during the period for which the statement is submitted”

Section 62(4) explicitly defines in statute the primary disclosure threshold of £11,180, with subsection (6A) setting a subsequent threshold of £2,230. These thresholds are enumerated exhaustively and apply to the treasurer's duty to record donations in quarterly reports. The provision establishes clear, binding statutory procedure for when disclosure is required, with no delegation to regulation or administrative discretion.

“a if it is a donation of more than £11,180 , or b if, when it is added to any other relevant benefit or benefits , the aggregate amount of the benefits is more than £11,180”

52 USC § 30104 codifies disclosure thresholds in statute: $200 itemization for individual contributors, $1,000 political committee threshold (per § 30101(4)).

The section explicitly defines in statute a disclosure threshold of $50 per contributor: contributions of $50 or less may be aggregated without separate listing, while contributions exceeding $50 (individually or in aggregate from the same source) must be reported separately. This establishes the threshold in statutory language rather than delegating it to regulation or administrative discretion.

“For all individual contributions of $50 or less, a single aggregate figure may be reported without separate detailed listings.”

§ 2963 codifies the disclosure threshold: the uniform campaign-finance reporting form must show 'the full name, town of residence, and mailing address of each contributor who contributes an amount in excess of $100.00, the date of the contribution, and the amount contributed,' with contributions of $100 or less reported in aggregate. A statutory itemization threshold is codified.

“each contributor who contributes an amount in excess of $100.00”

The statute explicitly defines tiered disclosure thresholds ($5,000 for statewide, $1,000 for General Assembly, $500 for other offices) and specifies the triggering window (11 days before an election through election day). The thresholds are codified in statute, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion, and are enumerated with clarity as to office level and timing.

“any single contribution of $5,000 or more for a statewide office, $1,000 or more for the General Assembly, or $500 or more for any other office, knowingly received or reported by the candidate or his treasurer on behalf of his candidacy on and after the eleventh day preceding (i) a primary and before the primary date, (ii) a general election and before the general election date, or (iii) any other election in which the individual is a candidate and before the election day, shall be reported in writing”

RCW 29B.25.100 explicitly defines disclosure thresholds in statute for multiple contributor classes: pledges under $100 need not be reported (subsection 2(a)); contributions of $25 or less in aggregate may be lumped (subsection 2(c)); incidental committee payments below $10,000 from non-top-10 sources need not be reported (subsection 2(d)). These thresholds are codified directly in the statute, not delegated to administrative rule, satisfying the procedural-clarity requirement.

“Contributions of no more than twenty-five dollars in the aggregate from any one person during the election campaign may be reported as one lump sum if the treasurer maintains a separate and private list of the name, address, and amount of each such contributor”

The statute explicitly defines a disclosure threshold of $25: contributions at or above that amount require disclosure of telephone number, occupation, and employer name, while contributions below $25 require less detailed disclosure. This threshold is directly codified in statute (§ 3-12-9(b)(2)), not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion.

“For qualifying contributions of $25 or more, the contributor's signature, printed name, street address, zip code, telephone number, occupation and name of employer; and for qualifying contributions of less than $25, the contributor's signature, printed name, street address and zip code”

The statute explicitly defines a $100 disclosure threshold in the text itself, specifying that contributions of $100 or more must be itemized with full details (date, name, purpose), while contributions under $100 must be reported but need not be itemized. This threshold is statutorily grounded and unambiguous, satisfying the procedural requirement that disclosure thresholds be defined in statute rather than left to regulation or administrative discretion.

“The date of each contribution of one hundred dollars ($100.00) or more, any expenditure or obligation, the name of the person from whom received or to whom paid and the purpose of each expenditure or obligation shall be listed. All contributions under one hundred dollars ($100.00) shall be reported but need not be itemized.”

The statute mandates a detailed report of all public and private contributions received, with indication of origin and amount, to be filed 10 days before election. This establishes a statutory disclosure requirement in absolute terms (no numerical threshold exemption stated). However, the section does not explicitly define a specific monetary threshold above which disclosure becomes mandatory—it appears to require disclosure of all contributions without exception. While this satisfies the requirement that disclosure be statutory and not regulatory, the absence of an enumerated threshold amount (or explicit statement that all amounts must be disclosed) creates interpretive ambiguity about whether a de minimis or practical reporting threshold exists elsewhere in the law.

The section repeatedly references 'the disclosure threshold' as a defined trigger for reporting obligations (triggering the requirement to file returns and specify gift amounts), establishing that a threshold exists in statute. However, the section does NOT state what the threshold amount IS—it merely cross-references the concept without defining the dollar figure. The threshold is defined elsewhere in the Act (likely s. 314AE or related provisions not provided here). A credible scholar on either side of the political spectrum would agree that procedural clarity requires the actual threshold amount to be either stated in this section or unambiguously incorporated by reference; the current language satisfies the principle that thresholds must be statutory (not regulatory), but does not fully satisfy the principle that thresholds must be enumerated in the relevant operative section.

“either: (i) the amount of at least one such gift was more than the disclosure threshold; or (ii) the total amount of all gifts received by the person from at least one single person during the financial year was more than the disclosure threshold”

The statute mandates disclosure of monetary resources received within 72 hours and requires donor identification (names, CPF/CNPJ, and amounts) in final accounting. However, the section does not explicitly establish a minimum threshold amount above which disclosure becomes mandatory. § 6o exempts small in-kind contributions (up to R$ 4,000 per cedent) from accounting requirements, but this is an exemption, not a threshold definition for mandatory disclosure. The statute imposes disclosure obligations but lacks a clear, enumerated threshold for when the duty to disclose attaches.

Чл. 171 codifies the Unified Public Register at the Bulgarian Audit Office ('Сметна палата') with full disclosure of donor names, donation types, purposes, values, and origin declarations. No minimum threshold means every donation must be reported; the criterion of 'threshold defined in statute' is satisfied via the absence-of-threshold (i.e., full disclosure regime).

“В Сметната палата се създава единен публичен регистър на партиите”

The statute defines specific thresholds for disclosure of certain items (1000 Kč for donor identity details, 50000 Kč for inherited property and in-kind benefits, 50000 Kč for member contributions). However, the section does not clearly establish a general contribution-disclosure threshold in the sense of 'contributions below X amount need not be reported at all'—instead, it specifies which details must accompany reports at various thresholds. The core disclosure obligation itself (reporting contributions) is mandated, but the criterion asks whether the threshold amount triggering disclosure is statutorily defined. The thresholds present here govern *detail level* (e.g., omit birth date for gifts under 1000 Kč) rather than a threshold exempting contributions from disclosure altogether.

“u darů nepřevyšujících částku 1000 Kč se datum narození neuvádí”

The section defines thresholds for when a campaign account must be established (1% of votes or receipt of donations), triggering disclosure obligations. However, the specific monetary disclosure threshold for reporting individual contributions is not enumerated in this statute section—it is referenced to other articles (L. 52-8, L. 52-11) and partly delegated to regulation (décret) for candidates receiving less than 5% of votes. The procedural clarity is incomplete because the contribution-reporting floor itself is not fully codified here.

“Chaque candidat ou candidat tête de liste soumis au plafonnement des dépenses électorales prévu à l'article L. 52-11 est tenu d'établir un compte de campagne lorsqu'il a obtenu au moins 1 % des suffrages exprimés ou s'il a bénéficié de dons de personnes physiques conformément à l'article L. 52-8”

Article 34 establishes that contribution limits (which effectively function as disclosure thresholds) exist and references them as statutory content (to be found in 'the Special part' of the Constitutional Law). However, the specific threshold amounts are not enumerated in this section—they are deferred to another statutory section. The section does require disclosure of total amounts and sources within five days after publication of results, but does not specify what contribution size triggers mandatory itemized disclosure during the campaign or pre-election reporting.

“The maximum size of the financial resources which can be transferred to the election funds from the aforementioned sources shall be determined in the Special part of this Constitutional Law.”

KRS 121.180 codifies the reports required of candidates, slates, committees, and treasurers. Kentucky's itemization threshold — contributions in excess of $100 must be itemized with full contributor detail — is codified in KRS 121.120(4)(f); the specific threshold language was not cleanly surfaced for this datapoint.

The statute establishes contribution limits (thresholds) and specifies that cash donations up to an average national salary are permitted, creating an implicit disclosure threshold. However, the statute explicitly delegates to the Central Electoral Commission the determination of 'the procedure for collecting and depositing cash donations' and in paragraph (6) states that 'the conditions and the manner in which they are recorded, and the procedure for reporting them, shall be laid down in regulations approved by the Central Electoral Commission.' This means the specific disclosure reporting threshold and mechanism are not fully defined in statute but left to administrative regulation, satisfying the criterion only partially.

§ 14-124 codifies exceptions/exemptions to the disclosure threshold (small donations, etc.). § 14-118 (not in FTS top-5) codifies the actual aggregate-threshold for itemized disclosure ($99/$100 aggregate). Threshold is statutorily set.

§ 12-27-3 codifies statements of organization filing requirements for PACs, candidates, and committees. § 12-27-14 codifies property-sale reporting threshold. Disclosure thresholds for itemization are codified in § 12-27-11 ($100 aggregate) — not in FTS top-5 for this datapoint.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 130 of the Belgian Electoral Code concerns state and local expenditures for election administration (ballot paper, polling-station staffing, voter transport, insurance), not campaign contributions or disclosure thresholds. The section contains no definition of contribution-disclosure thresholds, reporting requirements, or the monetary amounts triggering disclosure obligations.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 35 of the PRC Village Organization Law addresses village affairs disclosure (村务公开) and financial transparency for village committees, but it does not establish a disclosure threshold for campaign contributions. The section mandates periodic publication of financial management, decisions, and matters of public interest, but contains no definition of a contribution-reporting threshold tied to any monetary amount. This statute governs village governance transparency, not campaign finance contribution disclosure.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 20 regulates the distribution and payment mechanism for campaign reimbursement funds to candidates, parties, and lists, but does not address disclosure thresholds for contributions. It concerns public financing reimbursement procedures, not the statutory definition of when contributions must be reported to the authorities. No disclosure threshold is mentioned or defined in this section.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 21-2-408 codifies poll-watcher requirements — unrelated to campaign-finance disclosure threshold. Disclosure thresholds live in O.C.G.A. § 21-5-34 (separate chapter, not ingested).

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Σύνταγμα Άρθρο 54 (meta) — disclosure thresholds in Ν. 3023/2002 Άρθρα 17-19 but the specific threshold-language did not surface for this query.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 61 addresses voter secrecy and the prohibition on demanding voting information from voters. It contains no provision defining a disclosure threshold for campaign contributions, nor does it establish any campaign-finance disclosure framework. The section is substantively unrelated to contribution-disclosure requirements.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the administrative dissolution of committees by county election boards based on dormancy criteria (no expenditure reports in 3 years, cash on hand ≤$1,000). It does not define or address disclosure thresholds—that is, the dollar amount above which contributions must be reported. The criterion requires that disclosure thresholds be codified in statute; this section contains no such threshold definition.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 145 concerns only the mechanics of vote counting and seat allocation under a proportional-representation system. It contains no reference to contribution disclosure, thresholds, reporting requirements, or any campaign-finance procedural element. The section is entirely silent on disclosure obligations.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 67 defines the campaign treasurer's role and the scope of campaign accounts (recettes and dépenses over a 6-month pre-election period), but contains no disclosure threshold—no minimum amount above which contributions must be reported. The section establishes record-keeping obligations and timing but does not enumerate a statutory threshold for disclosure triggering.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 426 establishes the procedural mechanism for the Technical Audit Unit to receive and review income and expense reports from independent candidates, but it does not define or enumerate a disclosure threshold (the monetary amount above which contributions must be reported). The section creates an institutional duty to receive and process reports and addresses information-request procedures, but contains no statutory specification of the threshold amount that triggers reporting obligations.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 1-19-34 establishes recordkeeping requirements and anonymous-contribution caps, but does not define a disclosure threshold (the dollar amount above which contributions must be reported to the public or authorities). The section requires treasurers to maintain itemized records of contributions received and their purposes, but does not specify at what contribution amount that information must be disclosed or reported. Disclosure-threshold policy is apparently codified elsewhere in the statute.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 145 addresses the procedural appeals mechanism for rejected financial reports by electoral committees, including timelines for appeals to the Supreme Court and regional courts. It does not define or reference any disclosure threshold for contributions. The section concerns post-hoc review of already-filed reports, not the substantive rules governing what contributions must be disclosed or above what amount.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 15.º addresses the procedural mechanism for managing campaign finances (separate accounts, bank accounts, budget submission to the competent authority), but does not define or reference any disclosure threshold for contributions. The section requires submission of campaign budgets but does not specify what amount or type of contribution must be disclosed. The criterion requires a statutory statement of the threshold amount; this section is silent on that threshold.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

Article 58 codifies the electoral fund framework. Disclosure thresholds are in subordinate laws (Federal Law on Election of Deputies + Federal Law on Election of President), not in 67-FZ directly.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 83 governs the appointment and conduct of institutions (likely electoral commissions or oversight bodies) and their employees, establishing impartiality requirements, conflict-of-interest rules, and disciplinary procedures. It contains no reference to disclosure thresholds, contribution reporting, or any campaign-finance disclosure mechanism. The section is entirely procedural-administrative and does not address DISC.1's subject matter.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses post-election audit and enforcement procedures by the Spanish Court of Auditors (Tribunal de Cuentas), including timelines for scrutiny, sanctions authority, and public-fund distribution. It does not establish or reference a disclosure threshold for contributions. While it mandates campaign accounting review, it contains no definition of which contribution amounts trigger reporting obligations—a procedural element necessary to satisfy DISC.1.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: FTS-surfaced statutes (Law 6271 Article 14, Law 2820 Article 75, Anayasa Article 161, Law 2820 Ek Madde 7) do not codify a specific lira threshold above which contributions must be reported. Law 2820 Article 67 (not in FTS candidates here) sets the contribution cap but is itself the limit, not a 'reporting threshold' in the disclosure sense.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.