Enumerated registration methods

This section exhaustively enumerates the statutory registration methods available under Alabama law: in-person registration before a registrar, judge of probate, or clerk; representation before the board of registrars; and mail registration for specified categories (Armed Forces members, persons employed or studying abroad, and their spouses/children). The statute specifies the precise conditions and authorities that govern each method, leaving no gap for administrative discretion to create unlisted registration pathways.

“Each voter whose name is to be removed shall reidentify himself or herself by appearing in person before a registrar, or by appearing before the judge of probate, or either of the clerks in the office of the judge of probate, or through his or her representative before the board of registrars in regular session except that the following persons shall be entitled to reidentify by mail if they possess the qualifications of an elector”

The statute exhaustively enumerates the available registration methods in statutory text: in-person, through a voter registration agency, by authorized proxy with written power of attorney, by mail, by facsimile/scanning/electronic transmission (with director approval), and via permanent fund dividend application. The enumeration is complete and set in statute rather than left to administrative discretion.

“Registration may be made in person before a registration official or through a voter registration agency; by another individual on behalf of the voter if the voter has executed a written general power of attorney or a written special power of attorney authorizing that other individual to register the voter; by mail; by facsimile transmission, scanning, or another method of electronic transmission that the director approves; or by completing a permanent fund dividend application under AS 43.23.015”

Чл. 36 codifies the current-address inclusion request: voter with different permanent/current addresses can request inclusion in list by current address up to 14 days before election day (written application or electronic via GRAO).

This section exhaustively enumerates same-day election registration as a specific, statutorily-defined registration method, with clear eligibility criteria (sections 9-12), required procedures (appearance in person by 8 p.m. on election day or during early voting period), and designated locations certified to the Secretary of State. The statute leaves no discretion to administrators regarding whether this method exists or its core parameters.

“a person who (1) is (A) not an elector, or (B) an elector registered in a municipality who wishes to change such elector's registration to another municipality pursuant to the provisions of subdivision (2) of subsection (e) of this section, and (2) meets the eligibility requirements under subsection (a) of section 9-12 , may apply for same-day election registration pursuant to the provisions of this section”

This section exhaustively enumerates a specific registration method—automatic voter registration triggered at the Division of Motor Vehicles during designated transactions (license issuance, renewal, and address/name changes). The statute precisely defines the trigger events and the data-transfer procedure, establishing motor-voter automatic registration as a statutorily grounded, enumerated registration pathway with clear eligibility and notice requirements.

§ 19 codifies that voter lists are prepared from the Central Person Register (CPR) — Denmark uses AUTOMATIC voter registration via CPR. § 18 codifies municipal-council list preparation. § 16 codifies registration for citizens abroad. § 47 codifies in-person voting. § 96 codifies referendum participation. Automatic CPR-based registration framework codified.

“Valglisterne udarbejdes på grundlag af oplysningerne i Det Centrale Personregister (CPR).”

§ 20 of the Riigikogu Election Act codifies the single registration method — voters are registered automatically in the population register, with the procedure for maintaining that register prescribed by law. There is no application-based registration to enumerate because registration is passive.

“Voters are registered in the population register.”

§ 18 codifies that 'the Population Register Centre establishes the voter register' automatically from the Population Information System — Finland uses AUTOMATIC registration; there is no separate registration step. § 28 codifies register finality. § 20 codifies presidential-election register use. § 29 codifies register use. Automatic register-based registration framework codified.

§ 97.0525 + § 97.057 enumerate registration methods: online registration, DMV-based registration (motor-voter), supervisor-of-elections offices, by mail. Comprehensive multi-channel codification.

“An applicant may submit an online voter registration application using the procedures set forth in this section.”

§ 21-2-223 codifies mail voter-registration application forms. § 21-2-221 codifies driver's-license/ID-card application as voter-registration application (NVRA motor-voter). § 21-2-220 codifies general application procedure. § 21-2-221.2 (electronic registration) codifies online registration. Multiple enumerated registration methods codified.

This section statutorily enumerates the available registration methods with specificity: written application (in-person or mail) to the local authority, with alternative forms explicitly allowed (fax, email, or other documentable electronic transmission). The deadline (21 days before election) and required information fields are also statutorily prescribed. Both progressive and conservative election scholars would recognize this as clear statutory enumeration of permissible registration procedures rather than administrative discretion.

ΠΔ 26/2012 Άρθρο 8 codifies the unified registration framework (one registration per elector, automatic from municipal rolls). Άρθρο 10 (new electors) and Άρθρο 95 (ετεροδημότες) enumerate the methods. Registration is automatic via dimotologio, not opt-in.

“Κάθε εκλογέας εγγράφεται μόνο στους εκλογικούς καταλόγους του δήμου στα δημοτολόγια του οποίου είναι εγγεγραμμένος”

10 ILCS 5/1A-16.5 codifies online voter registration; § 1A-16.7 codifies automatic government-agency voter registration (AVR); § 1A-16.8 codifies NCOA-based automatic transfers. Three distinct registration methods enumerated.

“system for online voter registration that permits a person to apply to register to vote”

The statute exhaustively enumerates the three permitted methods for transmitting voter registration applications: hand delivery, USPS mail, and electronic transfer. This provides clear statutory grounding and enumeration of available registration methods, satisfying the procedural-clarity criterion under REG.2.

The statute exhaustively enumerates all available voter registration methods in subsection A: in-person at registrar's office, federal postcard application, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, designated voter registration agencies, online through the secretary of state's website (with ID requirement specified), and mail (national, state, or computer-generated forms). Additional provisions in subsections B-D specify procedures for military and overseas voters but do not add new methods—they specify implementation of methods already listed. The enumeration is complete and statutorily grounded.

§ 152 explicitly enumerates the available registration methods in statute: written application (which encompasses in-person and mail under the design provisions) and online voter registration application. The statute sets forth these methods exhaustively in subsection 1, with subsection 6 providing detailed statutory requirements for the online method, and cross-references to section 122 and subchapter 9 that together establish the complete registration framework. Both procedural and substantive elements are grounded in statute rather than left to administrative discretion.

“a person may register to vote or enroll in a political party, or both, by completing a written application that is designed by the Secretary of State or by submitting an online voter registration application”

The statute exhaustively enumerates five specific methods for party affiliation changes and decline-status changes: via voter registration application (incorporating methods in Subtitle 2), written mail notice, in-person application at local board, polling-place voter authority card, and Motor Vehicle Administration submission. The enumeration is statutory and comprehensive, leaving no gap for unspecified administrative discretion regarding which methods are available.

The statute explicitly and exhaustively enumerates the specific registration methods available: registration agencies, individuals and organizations, U.S. mail, online portal, and hand delivery. These methods are set forth in statute rather than left to administrative discretion, providing clear procedural guidance on how voters can register.

“Registrars of voters in cities and towns shall receive completed affidavits of voter registration from registration agencies, from individuals and organizations conducting voter registration, through the United States mail, through the online portal and by hand delivery.”

The statute exhaustively enumerates the registration methods: in-person at clerk/SOS/voter registration agency, by mail, and online (cross-referenced to § 509ii). All methods are grounded in statute.

“(1) A person who is not registered to vote at the address where he or she resides may apply to register to vote by submitting an application at any of the following locations: (a) The office of the clerk of a county or the office of the clerk of the city or township in which the applicant resides, during regular office hours of that clerk. (b) A department of state office. (c) A designated voter registration agency when submitting an application, recertification, renewal, or change of address at the voter registration agency. (2) A person who is not registered to vote at the address where he or she resides may apply for registration by submitting a completed mail registration application.”

§ 201.161 codifies AUTOMATIC voter registration through driver's-license, MinnesotaCare/medical-assistance, and state-agency applications. § 201.061 codifies in-person, by-mail, online, and Election Day registration. § 201.1611 codifies postsecondary registration. § 201.054 codifies registration methods. Comprehensive multi-method registration framework codified.

“an individual must be registered to vote if the individual is eligible to vote under section 201.014 and properly completes and submits one of the following applications”

The statute exhaustively enumerates three distinct registration methods for city elections: (1) mail registration, (2) in-person registration at the city clerk's office or designated municipal facility, and (3) online registration via the Secretary of State's system. Each method is assigned a specific deadline, eliminating administrative discretion over which methods are available. The enumeration is complete and statutorily grounded.

The statute exhaustively enumerates four specific registration methods: paper form submission, online portal registration, electronic registration at motor vehicle division, and any other method prescribed by the secretary of state. These cover the primary channels (mail/paper, online, motor-voter, and administrative discretion for additional methods). The enumeration is statutorily grounded and specific.

§ 8-706 codifies the statewide electronic early-mail-ballot transmittal system. § 5-800 (online voter registration, not in FTS top-5 for this query) codifies online registration. § 11-203 codifies federal-voter registration. § 8-702 codifies early-mail registration. Multiple statutory registration methods codified: in-person, by-mail, online, AVR (§ 5-216).

ORC 3503.19 exhaustively enumerates registration methods: in-person at designated agencies, BMV, schools, libraries, county treasurer, BOE branches; through another person; by mail to SoS or BOE; same-day at polling place for changes-of-address.

“may register or change their registration in person at any state”

The statute exhaustively enumerates four registration methods—mail, in-person (general agencies), motor-voter (via driver license/ID application), and electronic—using a numbered list introduced by 'may apply...by.' This structure sets statutory boundaries on available pathways rather than delegating enumeration to administrative discretion. The methods are clearly defined and are referenced to specific statutory sections where applicable, providing administrative grounding.

ORS 247.012(1) exhaustively enumerates all available registration methods in statute: mail delivery, in-person delivery, Department of Transportation (motor-voter), Oregon Health Authority (health-plan-based registration), and electronic registration system. Each method is specifically identified with closure language ('by:' followed by enumerated options a–e), satisfying the procedural-clarity criterion for enumeration.

§ 1321 codifies the enumerated registration methods: in-person (§ 1322), driver's-license application (§ 1323), by mail (§ 1324), at government agencies (§ 1325). Exhaustive statutory enumeration.

“An individual qualified to register to vote under section 1301(a)”

Art. 18 codifies residence-address registration request: 45 days before election day, voter may request inclusion in current-residence circumscription. Statutory method enumeration.

“Până cel mai târziu cu 45 de zile înaintea datei scrutinului”

MP Election Law Article 14 enumerates registration methods: (1) ex officio based on registry data, other official records, public documents, and direct verification; (2) on voter request with other credible evidence. Article 12 (4464) provides the right of citizen access to the list; Article 13 (4465) the residency-based registration rule; Article 16 (4468) permits multiple list formats.

“Упис у бирачки списак и брисање из тог списка врши се по службеној дужности, на основу података из матичних књига, других службених евиденција, јавних исправа и непосредног проверавања.”

§ 12-4-3 codifies that 'the county auditor shall provide mail registration cards along with instructions on how to properly register voters' — mail registration. § 12-4-9 codifies the master file. § 12-4-19.7 codifies maintenance. § 12-4-2 codifies multiple registration agencies. Multiple registration methods codified (in-person at auditor, by mail, at NVRA agencies).

5 kap. 4 § codifies that 'voters shall be entered on the electoral roll for the polling district in which they are registered as resident.' Sweden uses automatic registration via Folkbokföring (population register) — no separate registration step. 5 kap. 3 § codifies EU-citizen registration. 2 kap. 1 § codifies party registration. Automatic voter registration codified.

Law 298 Article 33 enumerates the (single) registration method in statute: address-registry-system-based automatic registration. Voters never apply — they are automatically included if registered in the civil-registry residence system. The exhaustive method is codified.

Art. I-48 codifies general information support including procedures by which voters may be added to lists. Art. I-47 codifies information-support principles. State Voter Register (Law 'On the State Voter Register') is the primary mechanism with continuous registration; additions via the precinct commission within statutory windows (Art. I-44, I-45). Multiple registration methods codified.

52 USC § 20503 codifies the NVRA enumerated registration methods: (1) motor-vehicle application, (2) mail application, (3) in-person application at designated sites. Federal-floor enumeration of methods.

“each State shall establish procedures to register to vote in elections for Federal office”

§ 2144a enumerates the registration methods: 'a person who desires to register to vote may apply in any of the following ways' — simultaneously with a DMV driver's-license or non-driver-ID application (§ 2145a), at a voter-registration agency, by mail or in-person delivery of an application to the town clerk, and online. Registration methods exhaustively enumerated.

“A person who desires to register to vote may apply in any of the following ways”

This statute explicitly enumerates a motor-voter registration method by establishing a specific statutory mechanism: DMV customers applying for, renewing, or changing address on licenses are statutorily presented with voter registration opportunity, with clear eligibility screening (citizenship, age 17+) and defined transmittal procedures to the Department of Elections and general registrars. The procedure is set by statute, not administrative discretion, with enumerated triggering events and explicit rules governing acceptance/rejection.

The statute exhaustively enumerates five distinct registration methods: (1) in-person at county clerk or Secretary of State offices, (2) mail, (3) motor-voter (designated agencies and motor vehicle licensing offices), (4) registration outreach programs, and (5) online/electronic registration system. Each method is specified with particular deadlines and procedures, leaving no gap for administrative discretion over which methods are available.

The statute exhaustively enumerates the available registration methods in Wyoming: in-person (at the polling place or county/city clerk office) and by mail. No other methods are authorized by this section, making the set of permissible registration methods clear and statutorily grounded. The enumeration is explicit and does not delegate to administrative discretion.

“An applicant may only register to vote in person or by mail at which time he shall provide the information required by W.S. 22-3-103(a) and sign the registration oath as required by W.S. 22-3-103(b).”

This section establishes automatic voter registration (motor-voter) tied to driver's license and ID card applications, which is statutorily grounded and enumerated. However, the statute does not exhaustively enumerate ALL available registration methods across Hawaii—it addresses only the automatic/motor-voter pathway. To fully satisfy the criterion, the statute would need to enumerate all permissible methods (in-person, mail, online, same-day, etc.) in a single location or cross-reference them comprehensively. This section captures one method clearly but does not provide the exhaustive enumeration of all registration pathways required by the criterion.

“An application for voter registration shall be a part of the application for issuance of an identification card under section 286-303 and the application for issuance of a driver's license under section 286-111.”

KRS 116.0455 codifies motor-voter registration — every driver's-license application serves as a voter-registration application unless declined — and KRS 116.085 codifies registration/transfer in person, by mail, or through the Transportation Cabinet. Agency registration is codified in KRS 116.048 (NVRA agencies). The registration methods are codified, though distributed across Chapter 116 rather than in a single enumeration.

Latvia's single registration method is automatic inclusion in the electoral register (Register of Natural Persons), so there are no application-based methods to enumerate; the surfaced sections show the statutory voting channels rather than a registration-methods catalogue.

Lithuania uses a single automatic registration method — inclusion in the Voter List drawn from the Population Register on the basis of citizenship documents (§ 34) — so there are no multiple application-based methods to enumerate; § 41-43 cover voters abroad, in service and in care.

Montana codifies multiple registration methods — in-person and by mail (§ 13-2-110), agency-based registration (§ 13-2-221), motor-voter, and late/election-day registration (§ 13-2-304) — but they are spread across sections rather than set out as a single exhaustive enumeration.

§ 2-8 codifies voter-roll correction procedure (voter applies in writing to municipal election board). § 2-7 codifies public display of the voter roll. § 2-9 codifies notification of roll changes. § 9-5 codifies electronic voter roll usage at polling places. Voter registration is automatic via the Norwegian National Population Register (Folkeregisteret); manual registration not codified as separate methods.

§ 20.037 codifies registration through voter-registration agencies by mail and telephone-triggered mailing. The full enumeration of registration methods — personal delivery, mail, and telephonic facsimile (§ 13.002), motor-voter and agency registration (Ch. 20) — is codified, though REG.2's FTS surfaced mainly mail-ballot provisions; agency/mail registration is evidenced here.

This section describes one specific registration method (automatic registration via enhanced driver's licenses) with detailed statutory procedures for its operation, cure pathway (45-day verification notice), and decline mechanism. However, it does not enumerate all available registration methods across the state. The criterion requires exhaustive enumeration of all available methods (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day, etc.) in a single section or statute. This section addresses only the automatic registration method and references but does not enumerate other pathways in RCW 29A.08.355 and related sections.

“For persons age eighteen years and older registering under RCW 29A.08.355(1), an application is considered complete only if it contains the information required by RCW 29A.08.010 and other information as required by the secretary of state.”

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 102 of the Código Electoral Nacional addresses the scrutiny (counting) process and documentation requirements at the polling place — it concerns the tabulation of votes and the creation of official records after voting has concluded. It contains no enumeration of voter registration methods, no reference to registration procedures, and does not address how voters may register (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, or same-day). This section is procedurally inapplicable to the registration-methods criterion.

This section references other statutory sections (16-103 and 16-543.02) as sources for enumerated registration methods but does not itself enumerate those methods. The criterion requires exhaustive enumeration of available registration methods within the section or clear incorporation by reference to specific enumerated methods. While the statute properly grounds registration procedure in law (satisfying the procedural-clarity principle of statutory grounding), the enumeration of actual methods is delegated to other sections not provided here.

“Except for a person who properly registers to vote as prescribed by section 16-103 or 16-543.02”

Section 7-5-406(b)(2)(A) enumerates registration methods (mail or electronic) only for uniformed services and overseas voters—a narrow subset. The statute delegates to the Secretary of State to 'establish and transmit...procedures' without exhaustively enumerating registration methods in the statute itself for the general population. The procedural requirement is administratively set rather than statutorily enumerated. For the criterion to be satisfied, all available methods must be enumerated in statute; here, the core registration pathways for ordinary voters are not addressed in this section.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 85 delegates the specification of registration methods to proclamation and regulations rather than enumerating them exhaustively in statute. The text explicitly allows the proclamation to 'specify the manner' and requires compliance 'in accordance with the regulations,' meaning the actual enumerated methods are left to subordinate instruments and administrative discretion, not statutory enumeration.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section heading lists administrative topics related to voter rolls (location of entries, posting, notification, corrections, complaints, closure) but does not enumerate any registration methods (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, or same-day). The text is a table of contents or organizational outline of § 37 without substantive procedural content on how voters may register.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

The statute specifies that Belgian citizens abroad must indicate their chosen voting method on a form, but does not exhaustively enumerate what those methods actually are (in-person, mail, online, etc.). The actual registration methods available are referenced elsewhere in the code (articles 180quater, 180sexies, etc.) rather than enumerated in this section. The procedural requirement is set in statute, but the available methods themselves are not enumerated here.

“Le Belge indique sur le formulaire visé au § 1er le mode selon lequel il entend exercer son droit de vote.”

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses electoral propaganda (campaign advertising) on the internet, not voter registration methods. It enumerates permitted channels for political advertising (candidate websites, party sites, emails, social media) but contains no provisions whatsoever regarding voter registration procedures, methods, or enumeration. The criterion REG.2 evaluates registration access; this section is categorically outside the scope of registration law.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses data privacy restrictions on the Register of Electors, not registration methods. It does not enumerate, describe, or establish any registration procedures or pathways (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, or same-day). The criterion requires exhaustive enumeration of available registration methods in statute; this section contains no such enumeration.

No matching sections in corpus.

This section enumerates change-of-address methods (mail, in-person, online) with statutory specificity and clear procedures. However, the criterion asks for enumeration of *initial registration methods* (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day), and this section addresses only address *changes*, not the full registration pathway. The statute does not exhaustively enumerate the initial registration methods available in Colorado.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses voting location procedures for registered voters presenting a voter card or notification of voting in another district, not registration methods themselves. It does not enumerate or establish any registration procedures (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, or same-day). The statute addresses how registered voters cast ballots, not how they become registered.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section does not address registration methods at all. It concerns supplementary electoral lists, the mention of nationality by mayors, and restrictions on dual registration across communes. There is no enumeration of how voters may register (in-person, mail, online, etc.), making this section inapplicable to the criterion.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 50 covers campaign media coverage; Article 185 (transitional). Georgia uses automatic registration from Civil Registry — codified in Election Code Article 31 (in REG.4 cands, partially surfaced) but the enumeration of methods isn't crisply captured for this datapoint.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The section establishes that only those on the voter roll may vote, but it does not enumerate or describe any registration methods at all (in-person, mail, online, automatic, or otherwise). The procedural mechanisms by which a person becomes 'optaget på valglisten' (registered on the voter list) are not specified in this section and no exhaustive enumeration of available registration methods is provided.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 30 addresses the compilation and publication of electoral registers—a procedural step occurring after registration. It does not enumerate registration methods themselves (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, or same-day registration). The section deals only with how completed registers are publicized and made accessible to the public and municipalities, not how voters become registered in the first place.

This section enumerates mail registration as a method and sets a statutory deadline, but it does not exhaustively enumerate *all* available registration methods in Idaho statute—it addresses only mail registration. The criterion asks whether all methods (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day) are exhaustively enumerated in one section. This section covers only mail; other methods would be found elsewhere in the Idaho Code (likely § 34-408 or other provisions). Because the section does not provide the complete enumeration required by the criterion, it does not satisfy the requirement.

This section establishes one specific registration method (federal mail form) with statutory grounding and conditions, but does not enumerate all available registration methods in Iowa. The criterion requires exhaustive enumeration of all methods (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day) in statute. This section addresses only mail registration via federal form and leaves other methods to be defined elsewhere in the code, failing the exhaustiveness requirement.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 89 addresses data-sharing procedures between registration authorities and government bodies to maintain electoral register accuracy. It does not enumerate or describe the available registration methods (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day) at all. The section is procedural infrastructure for data management, not substantive electoral access rules.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section governs destruction and retention schedules for election records, not registration methods. It contains no information about how voters may register (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day), nor does it enumerate or reference registration procedures. The criterion requires evaluation of registration method procedure; this statute addresses record-keeping timelines only.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 28 addresses pre-election campaign rights and conduct, not voter registration methods. It contains no enumeration of registration methods (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day, etc.). The section is about campaign funding, media access, debates, and materials distribution—procedurally distinct from the voter registration process itself. This section does not engage the criterion's subject matter.

The statute specifies one registration method (in-person deposit of a signed, dated written application to the municipal council before April 1) with enumerated supporting documents and formal declarations. However, the section does not exhaustively enumerate whether alternative methods—mail, online, or automatic registration—are permitted or prohibited. The text addresses only the application procedure for foreign nationals seeking to register for the first time; it does not comprehensively cover all registration methods available to all categories of voters.

“La demande d'inscription aux élections communales ou européennes signée et datée est déposée, sous peine de déchéance, sur papier libre et contre récépissé auprès du collège des bourgmestre et échevins de la commune de résidence de l'intéressé”

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 41 addresses the administrative mechanics of list revision and deduplication when voters change residence, but does not enumerate registration methods. The statute prescribes automatic transfer during annual list revision but does not exhaustively specify what registration methods (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day) are available to voters. The procedure is administrative and assumes prior registration without detailing how initial or alternative registration can occur.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The section establishes eligibility and a basic application process but does not enumerate the specific registration methods available (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day). While it references 'the form set out in the Second Schedule,' the statute text provided does not detail which submission methods are permitted or exhaustively list available pathways. The procedural mechanism itself remains undefined in this excerpt.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section defines electoral lists and territorial divisions for electoral sections, but does not enumerate or describe registration methods at all. It does not address how citizens register to vote (in-person, mail, online, automatic, etc.), making it inapplicable to REG.2's focus on enumerated registration procedures.

This section enumerates mail-in registration as one method and provides detailed statutory procedure for it. However, the criterion asks whether ALL available registration methods are exhaustively enumerated in statute. This section addresses only mail-in application; it does not enumerate or reference in-person, online, motor-voter, automatic, or same-day registration methods. A complete answer to REG.2 requires review of the entire statutory scheme, but this section alone does not satisfy the criterion because it covers only one method without exhaustively listing all methods available under Mississippi law.

The statute permits federal postcard applications and electronic equivalents for covered voters, but explicitly delegates authority to unspecified 'other approved methods' without enumeration. The phrase 'in addition to any other approved method' defers enumeration to administrative discretion rather than grounding available methods exhaustively in statute, failing the enumeration requirement for procedural clarity.

“To apply to register to vote, in addition to any other approved method, a covered voter may use a federal postcard application, or the application's electronic equivalent.”

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section describes the composition, format, and administration of electoral rolls—the voter register itself—but does not enumerate the methods by which voters may register or be added to those rolls. The statute delegates rule-making authority to the Central Electoral Commission ('The rules on the establishment, administration, dissemination and updating of electoral rolls shall be approved by the Central Electoral Commission'), leaving the registration method procedures to administrative regulation rather than statutory enumeration. No specific registration methods (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, or same-day) are identified or exhaustively listed in this section.

This section enumerates ONE registration method (motor-voter at DMV) in statutory detail with specific deadlines and procedures. However, it does not exhaustively enumerate ALL available registration methods statewide. The criterion requires exhaustive enumeration of the range of available methods (in-person, mail, online, same-day, etc.). This section addresses only the DMV-based method and references section 32-312 for other application content, but does not itself enumerate the full suite of registration options available to Nebraska voters.

“The Department of Motor Vehicles, with the assistance of the Secretary of State, shall prescribe a voter registration application which may be used to register to vote or change his or her address for voting purposes at the same time an elector applies for an original or renewal motor vehicle operator's license, an original or renewal state identification card, or a replacement thereof.”

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section establishes that mayors and aldermen register voter eligibility but does not enumerate the methods by which registration occurs (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, etc.). The statute delegates the *fact* of registration to officials without specifying the procedural pathways or modes available to citizens.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses only voter education and public information about identity proof requirements under RSA 659:13. It does not enumerate or describe any registration methods (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, or same-day). The criterion requires exhaustive statutory enumeration of available registration methods themselves, which is absent from this section.

The statute enumerates specific registration methods for overseas voters (mail via county clerk or Secretary of State, and federal postcard application), but this is a narrow subset addressing only overseas voters and their application procedures. The section does not exhaustively enumerate registration methods for all voters (in-person, online, motor-voter, same-day, etc.), nor does it purport to be a comprehensive registration procedure statute. It addresses overseas ballot applications, not the full scope of registration method availability that REG.2 requires.

“Requests for an application to vote in an election as an overseas voter may be made by or on behalf of an applicant to the county clerk of the county in which the applicant was formerly domiciled or to the Secretary of State of New Jersey”

The statute enumerates specific methods (federal postcard application, federal write-in ballot declaration, electronic transmission system) but then broadly permits 'any other approved method' and 'any other approved electronic registration application,' delegating enumeration of additional methods to the State Board of Elections rather than exhaustively specifying all permitted registration methods in the statute itself. This falls short of the procedural-clarity requirement that all available methods be enumerated directly in statute.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 16.1-06-14 (voting-system requirements) is unrelated. ND has NO voter registration; eligibility is verified at the polls by ID per § 16.1-05-07. Central voter file (§ 16.1-02-03) is populated automatically from DOT records and poll-day attendance — no separate registration method to enumerate.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section describes the voter register structure and categories of eligible voters, but does not enumerate registration methods. The statute states that Polish citizens with permanent residence are registered ex officio (§8), and EU citizens must submit a written request (§10), but no section provides an exhaustive statutory enumeration of how voters initiate registration, what methods are available (in-person, mail, online, etc.), or procedural steps. The registration mechanism is implicit rather than explicitly enumerated.

No matching sections in corpus.

This section establishes motor-voter registration at the DMV with detailed statutory procedure (acceptance date, transmission timing, verification process). However, the criterion requires enumeration of ALL available registration methods (in-person, mail, online, same-day, automatic, etc.). This section covers only the DMV method and does not enumerate or reference other registration pathways that may exist elsewhere in Rhode Island law. A complete answer to REG.2 requires reviewing the full Title 17 statutory scheme; this single section addresses only one method.

Article 48 covers election campaigning, Article 62 absentee certificate, Article 15 referendum calling, Article 64 voting procedure. Voter registration in Russia is automatic via the state automated system 'GAS Vybory' (Article 74 in REG.3 cands). Methods aren't exhaustively enumerated in the surfaced corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 11 addresses post-registration amendments and deregistration by the chief electoral officer, not the enumeration of voter registration methods themselves. The section grants discretionary power to the officer to change or deregister voters when 'satisfied' certain conditions are met, but contains no enumeration of how voters initially register (in-person, mail, online, etc.). The procedural criterion requires statutory enumeration of available registration methods; this section provides neither enumeration nor reference to such methods.

This section describes one registration method (electronic/online) with clear statutory grounding and enumerated requirements. However, REG.2 requires exhaustive enumeration of ALL available registration methods statewide (in-person, mail, motor-voter, automatic, same-day, etc.). This section addresses only electronic registration and does not enumerate or reference the full universe of registration pathways available in South Carolina. The criterion cannot be satisfied by a single-method provision.

“(A) A person who is qualified to register to vote and who has a valid South Carolina driver's license or state identification card issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles may submit an application for voter registration electronically on the Internet website of the State Election Commission.”

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 30 of LOREG establishes the competencies of the Electoral Census Office (administering the census, resolving disputes, and publishing electoral lists), but it does not enumerate the available registration methods (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day, etc.). The section addresses administrative oversight and cure/appeal procedures for census disputes, not the substantive statutory enumeration of how voters register in the first place.

This section provides a clear statutory procedure for mail registration, including form design requirements and distribution mechanisms. However, it addresses only mail registration and does not enumerate the full universe of available registration methods (in-person, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day). The criterion requires exhaustive enumeration of all methods; this section addresses only one method and does not indicate whether other methods exist or how they are regulated.

“Qualified voters may register by mail by use of postal card forms in such a manner as provided for in this section. The coordinator of elections shall prepare voter registration forms in accordance with the provisions of this section and shall provide for the printing of an ample quantity of such registration forms to be distributed under the provisions of this section.”

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses voter identification and ballot-paper delivery procedures at the polling station, not registration methods. It does not enumerate how voters may register (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, or same-day), and therefore does not satisfy the criterion for enumerated registration methods. The criterion requires statutory enumeration of registration pathways; this section provides none.

This section enumerates mail registration as a method but does not exhaustively list all available registration methods. The criterion requires enumeration of ALL available methods (in-person, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day, etc.), not just mail. To satisfy the criterion, the statute would need to comprehensively state what registration methods exist across the jurisdiction, or this section would need to reference such an enumeration elsewhere. This section addresses only mail registration procedure.

§ 7.15 grants municipal clerks registration authority; enumerated methods (online, in-person, mail, motor-voter, same-day) live in Wis. Stat. Ch. 6 (not ingested).