At-polls cure procedure

The statute explicitly provides two at-polls cure procedures when a voter's name does not appear on the official list: (1) voting after presenting a proper certificate from the board of registrars, and (2) voting a provisional ballot. Both remedies are statutorily enumerated, giving a voter clear alternative pathways to cast a valid ballot despite registration discrepancies.

“provided, that nothing in this section shall prevent any qualified elector residing in the precinct, ward, or voting district from voting after presenting a proper certificate from the board of registrars, or from voting a provisional ballot or a provisional ballot in municipal elections when his or her name does not duly appear upon the official list of the precinct, district, ward, or subdivision.”

The statute provides an explicit cure procedure for voters lacking complete ID documentation: they may still vote if they satisfy the presiding officer's detailed interrogation about personal data and identifying information. This is statutorily grounded and enumerated, establishing a clear alternative pathway when ID is deficient or missing.

The statute explicitly prescribes a cure procedure for voters lacking compliant ID: they vote a provisional ballot under section 16-584 or a conditional provisional ballot under the secretary of state's procedures. This is statutorily grounded and enumerates the specific remedy (provisional ballot pathway) rather than leaving it to administrative discretion.

“If the elector does not present identification that complies with paragraph 1 of this subsection, the elector is only eligible to vote a provisional ballot as prescribed by section 16-584 or a conditional provisional ballot as provided for in the secretary of state's instruction and procedures manual adopted pursuant to section 16-452.”

The statute provides a clear, enumerated cure procedure for voters without ID: they cast a provisional ballot (subsection (b) procedures are detailed), and can cure the deficiency by presenting compliant ID to the county board or clerk by noon on Monday following election day (subsection (f)). The procedure is set by statute with specific timing and entity responsible, satisfying the procedural-clarity criterion regardless of policy stringency.

The statute establishes a clear, enumerated cure procedure for voters without ID: they may cast a ballot if known personally to a majority of the polling board members and no objection is raised per § 71 Abs. 1. The procedure is set in statute (not left to administrative discretion), the conditions are specifically defined, and documentation in the poll record is mandated. This satisfies the procedural-clarity criterion regardless of policy perspectives.

“Besitzt der Wähler eine Urkunde oder Bescheinigung der in Abs. 2 bezeichneten Art nicht, so ist er dennoch zur Abstimmung zuzulassen, wenn er der Mehrheit der Mitglieder der Wahlbehörde persönlich bekannt ist und kein Einspruch gemäß § 71 Abs. 1 erhoben wird.”

Чл. 264(4) codifies the at-polls cure: 'Ако избирателят не е вписан в избирателния списък... но има право да гласува, след проверка в списъка на заличените лица всички негови данни се вписват в допълнителната страница на избирателния списък' — voter not on list but eligible gets added on supplementary page after check.

Cal. Elec. Code § 15305 references the universe of 'unprocessed ballot' types including 'voted provisional ballot' and 'voted conditional registration ballot' — implying a statutory provisional-ballot regime exists for at-polls cure (codified in detail in Div 14 § 14310, not ingested here). § 15601 requires SoS regulations specifying recount procedures including provisional ballots.

This section establishes in statute a solemn declaration as a cure mechanism for voters who cannot prove identity or residence at the polls. The declaration form is prescribed by statute and enumerated with specific required statements (residence, age, citizenship, no prior voting). This provides a clear, statutory-grounded procedure for voters arriving without ID to complete their ballot at the polling station.

“the solemn declaration by which an elector proves his or her identity and residence, proves his or her residence only, proves that he or she is qualified as an elector or proves that he or she has not previously voted at the election shall be in the prescribed form, which shall include the statements that (a) the elector resides at the address at which he or she claims to reside; (b) the elector is 18 years of age or older or will be 18 years of age or older on polling day; (c) the elector is a Canadian citizen; and (d) the elector has not previously voted in the election”

The statute explicitly provides a defined cure procedure for voters without ID: they may cast a provisional ballot under article 8.5. The procedure is set in statute and enumerated (provisional ballot mechanism), meeting the procedural-clarity standard. While article 8.5 itself would contain the detailed mechanics, this section establishes the statutory cure pathway unambiguously.

This statute establishes a clear, enumerated at-polls cure procedure for voters who cannot immediately establish eligibility (including ID deficiencies): the provisional ballot process. The procedure is statutorily mandated (using 'shall' language), specifies the steps the moderator and polling place officials must follow, and requires documentation so the voter can verify status. The voter receives a concrete remedy pathway rather than being turned away.

“Upon receipt of an application for provisional ballot, the moderator shall provide the applicant with a provisional ballot and a serially-numbered envelope and shall make a record of such issuance on the provisional ballot inventory form. The applicant shall forthwith mark the ballot in the presence of a polling place official in such manner that the official shall not know how the ballot is marked. The applicant shall then fold the ballot in the presence of the polling place official so as to conceal the markings and deposit and seal it in the serially-numbered envelope in the manner prescribed by the Secretary of the State.”

§ 26 codifies itseoikaisu (self-correction): the Population Register Centre / local register office may, on its own motion, add a person to the voter register, mark them as ineligible, or correct an erroneous entry — by 12:00 on the 12th day before election day. § 24 codifies the voter's correction request (oikaisuvaatimus). § 28 codifies that even after the register becomes final a wrongly-excluded person may present proof to the polling committee. Comprehensive cure procedure codified.

§ 101.048 codifies at-polls cure via provisional ballot. § 101.49 covers signature-mismatch cure procedure. Strong at-polls cure regime.

§ 21-2-418 codifies provisional-ballot procedure when voter cannot satisfy ID. § 21-2-419 codifies validation of provisional ballots within 3 days. § 21-2-417 codifies affidavit-by-elector procedure if ID is not presentable. Cure procedure codified.

The statute explicitly provides a cure procedure for voters who cannot immediately complete registration verification at the polling place: they receive a provisional ballot if additional time or information is needed. This cure mechanism is statutorily grounded and enumerated, allowing the voter to cast a ballot despite incomplete validation at the moment of application, satisfying the procedural-clarity requirement for at-polls cure.

“If additional time or information is required to validate an application, the applicant shall be provided a provisional ballot.”

10 ILCS 5/18A-5 codifies provisional voting as the at-polls cure: voter whose name is not on the list, whose status is challenged, or whose ID is questioned may cast a provisional ballot subject to post-election verification.

“A person who claims to be a registered voter is entitled to cast a provisional ballot”

The statute explicitly prescribes a cure procedure: when a voter is challenged as ineligible, they receive a provisional ballot (rather than being turned away) and the affidavit satisfies the requirements for that ballot. This is a statutory-defined cure path (provisional ballot plus affidavit) rather than left to administrative discretion.

Iowa Code § 49.81 provides a clear statutory cure procedure for voters without ID: they cast a provisional ballot and must provide required identification either at the polling place before closing or to the commissioner's office by noon the Monday following the election (or before the canvass if earlier). The procedure is enumerated with specific deadlines and responsible officials, satisfying the procedural-clarity criterion regardless of whether one favors strict or lenient ID rules.

The statute explicitly defines an at-polls cure procedure for challenged voters: they may subscribe the registration application, mark a ballot, execute a prescribed affirmation, and have that ballot segregated as provisional pending review by the county canvassing board. The procedure is statutorily grounded (K.S.A. 25-409(b)), the cure mechanism (affidavit/affirmation) is enumerated with prescribed form language, and the review path is clearly assigned to the county board of canvassers. The voter is also provided written information on how to ascertain the ballot's status.

“If a person is challenged pursuant to K.S.A. 25-414 , and amendments thereto, such person shall be permitted to subscribe the application for registration and mark a ballot. The person shall then execute the affirmation prescribed in subsection (c) of this section before a member of the election board and the ballot shall thereupon be sealed in an envelope. The judges shall write on the envelope the word "provisional" and a statement of the reason for the challenge”

Section 10-306(a)(1)(vii) mandates that polling places post information about provisional voting, including the right to cast a provisional ballot, how to fill it out, and the standards for counting it. This establishes provisional voting as the statutory cure procedure for voters unable to satisfy ID requirements at the polls, with the procedure enumerated in statute and disclosure requirements specified.

“information regarding provisional voting, including: 1. information on the right of an individual to cast a provisional ballot; 2. how to fill out the provisional ballot application and cast the provisional ballot; and 3. the standards that will be applied in determining whether a provisional ballot will be counted”

The statute establishes a clear, enumerated cure procedure for voters without qualifying ID: they may cast a provisional ballot under section 76C. This is a defined statutory mechanism (referenced by statute section number) that provides a remedy when a voter fails to present identification. The procedure is set in statute, not left to administrative discretion.

“A person who desires to vote in person but does not satisfy clause (a) of subparagraph (A) may cast a provisional ballot under section 76C.”

The statute defines the post-election cure procedure for provisional ballots: the clerk has 6 days to verify eligibility, and enumerates the specific documents that establish identity/residence for tabulation. It also references the affidavit procedure under section 523(2).

The statute explicitly establishes a cure procedure for voters unable to provide ID at the polls: they may execute an affidavit under § 115.427 as an alternative, or vote a provisional ballot. The procedure is statutorily grounded, enumerated (affidavit or provisional ballot options), and provides a clear pathway for voters without ID to participate. This satisfies the dual-scholar test—both strict and permissive election scholars can recognize the procedure as clearly defined in statute.

“A voter claiming to be properly registered in the jurisdiction of the election authority and eligible to vote in an election, but whose eligibility at that precinct cannot be immediately established upon examination of the precinct register, shall be entitled to vote a provisional ballot after providing a form of personal identification required pursuant to section 115.427 or upon executing an affidavit under section 115.427”

A voter who cannot present sufficient ID casts a provisional ballot (§ 13-13-114(2), § 13-13-601) and has until 5 p.m. the day after the election to provide identification or eligibility information (§ 13-15-107) — a codified at-polls cure procedure.

“Before being given a ballot, an elector casting a provisional ballot”

The statute defines a clear, statutorily-grounded cure procedure for voters who arrive without required ID: they may cast a provisional ballot by completing and signing a registration application. This is an enumerated alternative pathway (not left to discretion), and the provisional ballot mechanism itself is defined in statute with specific certification requirements. The procedure is navigable and does not rely on administrator discretion.

“A voter whose name appears on the precinct list of registered voters for the polling place with a notation that the voter is required to present identification pursuant to section 32-318.01 but fails to present identification may vote a provisional ballot if he or she completes and signs a registration application before voting.”

The statute explicitly defines a cure procedure for voters without ID: they may provide required identification to the county or city clerk by 5 p.m. on the Friday following election day, at which point their provisional ballot must be counted. This is statutorily grounded, enumerated (specific deadline and method), and provides a clear remedy.

N.H. Rev. Stat. § 659:13-b establishes a statutorily defined cure procedure for voters without photo ID at the polls: the voter may execute an affidavit of religious exemption in a prescribed statutory form, swearing to their identity and religious objection to photo identification. The statute enumerates the exact form, required attestation by an election officer, and penalties for false statements, providing clear procedural guidance for poll workers and voters alike.

“The affidavit of religious exemption shall be in the following form: AFFIDAVIT OF RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION Name: ____________________ Domicile Address: ____________________ Date of birth: _______________ I hereby swear or affirm that because of my religious beliefs, I object to having my photograph taken and that I do not possess a form of identification that meets the requirements of the election laws of this state showing my photograph.”

This section provides a statutorily-defined cure procedure for voters not appearing on the rolls (which includes voters lacking ID verification): they may cast a provisional ballot upon executing a written affirmation. The procedure is enumerated in statute—not left to administrative discretion—and specifies the mechanism (provisional ballot + written affirmation) and the official responsible (election official at voting place). The statute also requires the county board to verify provisional ballots and establish an information system for voters to ascertain whether their ballot was counted and why, creating a defined review mechanism.

“An election official at the voting place shall notify the individual that the individual may cast a provisional official ballot in that election. The individual may cast a provisional official ballot at that voting place upon executing a written affirmation before an election official at the voting place, stating that the individual is a registered voter in the jurisdiction as provided in G.S. 163-82.1 in which the individual seeks to vote and is eligible to vote in that election.”

ORC 3505.182 codifies the provisional-ballot affirmation form including ID-options checklist, religious-objection alternative (§ 3505.19), and SSN-last-4 verification path.

“An Ohio driver's license or state identification card”

The statute provides a clear, enumerated at-polls cure procedure: a voter without ID may sign an oath-based affidavit and cast a provisional ballot. The statute then exhaustively specifies the conditions under which the provisional ballot is verified and counted (name, address, date of birth, and identifier matching), including additional cure mechanisms for voters with name or address changes. This is entirely statutory and non-discretionary.

§ 1210(a.2) codifies the at-polls cure procedure: an elector unable to produce ID (indigent / any other grounds) or whose ID is challenged by the judge of election 'shall be permitted to cast a provisional ballot' with statutory cure path.

“If any of the following apply, the elector shall be permitted to cast a provisional ballot”

Article 87.º, Section 2 provides a clear statutory cure procedure for voters arriving without primary ID (bilhete de identidade). It enumerates three specific alternatives: (1) any official document with updated photograph, (2) attestation by two registered citizen-voters under oath, or (3) unanimous recognition by mesa members. The procedure is exhaustively defined in statute, not left to administrative discretion, and allows the voter to proceed to vote once identified through any of these pathways.

“Na falta de bilhete de identidade, a identificação do eleitor faz-se por meio de qualquer outro documento oficial que contenha fotografia actualizada, ou através de dois cidadãos eleitores que atestem, sob compromisso de honra, a sua identidade, ou ainda por reconhecimento unânime dos membros da mesa.”

The statute provides a clear, enumerated cure procedure for voters who arrive without ID: they may cast a provisional ballot and execute a provisional ballot voter's application. The procedure is set in statute (not left to administrative discretion), and the acceptance standard is defined (signature matching on the voter's registration). Both procedural elements—the availability of the provisional ballot mechanism and the specific verification step—are statutorily grounded.

The statute establishes multiple enumerated cure procedures for voters without ID at the polls: (1) provisional ballot valid if ID is brought before certification; (2) provisional ballot with affidavit for religious objection; and (3) provisional ballot with affidavit for reasonable impediment. All procedures are defined in statute with clear paths for cure (ID submission, affidavit completion) and follow-up (county board determination per § 7-13-830). This satisfies the procedural-clarity criterion.

“If the elector cannot produce the identification as required in subsection (A), he may cast a provisional ballot that is counted only if the elector brings a valid and current photograph identification to the county board of voter registration and elections before certification of the election by the county board of canvassers. (2) If the manager disputes that the photograph contained on the required identification is the person presenting himself to vote, the elector may cast a provisional ballot. A determination of that provisional ballot must be made in accordance with Section 7-13-830. (D)(1)(a) If an elector does not produce a valid and current photograph identification due to a religious objection to being photographed, he may complete an affidavit under penalty of perjury at the polling place and affirm that the elector: (i) is the same individual who personally appeared at the polling place; (ii) cast the provisional ballot on election day; and (iii) has a religious objection to being photographed. Upon completion of the affidavit, the elector may cast a provisional ballot.”

§ 12-18-40 codifies provisional ballot procedure: affirmation, pollbook designation, sealed provisional envelope. § 12-20-13.2 codifies counting + certification. § 12-20-13.1 codifies counting officials. § 12-20-2.1 codifies envelope return procedure. Cure procedure for ID-failed voters codified through provisional ballot.

5 kap. 6 § codifies cure procedure for voter-roll errors: 'persons who consider that the electoral roll contains incorrect information about them shall, no later than twelve days before election day, in writing demand that the information be corrected.' 5 kap. 7 § codifies that corrected roll is sent to the municipal commission. 8 kap. 4 § / 8 kap. 5 § codify polling-place ID procedures. Comprehensive cure framework codified.

The statute explicitly establishes a cure procedure for voters arriving without ID: they are entitled to vote a provisional ballot. The text also references subsections (e) and (f) for additional procedural details, and earlier passages describe the provisional ballot envelope, affidavit requirements, and the role of the coordinator of elections, all of which are statutorily defined rather than left to administrative discretion. This provides a clear, enumerated cure path set in statute.

“If a voter is unable to present evidence of identification, the voter shall be entitled to vote a provisional ballot pursuant to subsection (e) unless the voter is eligible to vote pursuant to subsection (f).”

§ 63.011 codifies an at-polls cure procedure: a voter who cannot meet the ID requirement may cast a provisional ballot by executing an affidavit; § 63.001(i) codifies the reasonable-impediment declaration as an alternative; § 65.054 and § 65.0541 codify that a provisional ballot is accepted if the voter meets the ID requirement at casting or presents ID within the prescribed cure period. Comprehensive at-polls cure codified.

The statute explicitly references rule 40ZB as the defined procedure when a ballot paper is refused due to failure to answer identification questions satisfactorily. This provides a statutory cure mechanism (not left to administrator discretion) for voters who cannot satisfy the name/address verification questions at poll. The reference makes the remedy procedure statutory rather than discretionary.

“In the case of an election held in England and Wales or Scotland, see rule 40ZB (procedure where ballot paper is refused under this paragraph).”

52 USC § 21082 codifies HAVA provisional voting: any voter declaring eligibility but not on the list (or whose eligibility is challenged) shall be permitted to cast a provisional ballot, with statutory verification procedure and free voter access to ballot-status information system. At-polls cure for ID/registration issues.

“shall be permitted to cast a provisional ballot”

The statute defines an enumerated cure procedure for voters without valid ID at the polls: the poll worker records the fact in the official register, and the county clerk may verify identity and residence through alternative means (subsection 1(b)(ii)(B)) or the voter may provide ID to the county clerk before noon on the last business day before canvass (subsection 1(c)(iii)(B)). This is statutorily grounded, clearly specified, and provides defined pathways for provisional ballot cure without administrative discretion.

“either failed to provide valid voter identification or the documents provided as valid voter identification were inadequate and the poll worker recorded that fact in the official register but the county clerk verifies the individual's identity and residence through some other means”

§ 2556 codifies the at-polls cure: where a voter's name does not appear on the checklist, or the voter disputes a rejected registration, 'the election official shall allow the individual to vote provisionally.' § 2557 codifies the town clerk's adjudication of the provisional voter's attestation and § 2555 the provisional-ballot envelope. § 2546 codifies an opportunity to cure a defective returned ballot.

This section establishes a clear statutory cure procedure for provisional voters: a voter may request an extension to provide information proving eligibility, and the electoral board has authority to grant reasonable extensions (up to seven days post-election). The statute further provides that a provisional vote is counted if the Department of Elections or voter presents proof of timely voter registration application, creating a defined pathway to cure the initial deficiency.

The statute explicitly defines a cure procedure for voters without ID: they receive a provisional ballot that is accepted if the signature on their declaration matches their voter registration record. This is a statutory, enumerated procedure that does not rely on administrative discretion.

“Any individual who desires to vote in person but cannot provide identification shall be issued a provisional ballot, which shall be accepted if the signature on the declaration matches the signature on the voter's registration record.”

The statute provides a clear, statutorily-grounded at-polls cure procedure: a voter without valid ID may cast a provisional ballot after executing an affidavit. The procedure for counting is enumerated—signature verification against the voter registration record. This creates a defined remedy that is neither discretionary nor left to administrative interpretation.

Wyoming Statute § 22-15-105 establishes a clear statutory cure procedure for voters challenged at the polls: a provisional ballot accompanied by a written oath/affidavit before an election judge. The statute also specifies that challenged voters may present supporting documentation to the county clerk through the day after the election for eligibility determination. This provides both an immediate at-polls remedy (provisional ballot with affidavit) and a defined post-election cure path (documentary submission to county clerk), all enumerated in statute with no delegation to administrative discretion.

“A person challenged on any ground may vote by provisional ballot, if he subscribes this oath in writing before a judge of election”

ΠΔ 26/2012 Άρθρο 14 codifies the elector's right to request correction of any registration data. Not strictly an at-polls cure but a registration-correction mechanism.

“Κάθε εκλογέας μπορεί να ζητήσει αιτιολογημένα τη διόρθωση κάθε στοιχείου εγγραφής του στον εκλογικό κατάλογο”

KRS 117.225 codifies the at-polls procedure where identification or eligibility is in question — signature comparison against the original registration form and, where applicable, voting a supplemental paper ballot. The full no-ID cure is codified by cross-reference: KRS 117.228 lets a voter unable to provide proof of identification cast a ballot on executing an affidavit, and KRS 117.229 codifies a federal provisional ballot. The cure is codified but distributed across cross-referenced sections.

§ 201.195 codifies the challenge-petition procedure (a registered voter may challenge eligibility, with timing rules and cure windows). § 204C.10 (not in FTS top-5) codifies the voter signature certificate as an at-polls eligibility-affirmation mechanism. Cure / challenge-resolution procedure codified.

§ 8-303(2) codifies affidavit-ballot procedure when a voter cannot satisfy ID — vote cast by affidavit, with subsequent verification (§ 9-209). § 8-302 codifies the bipartisan inspector procedure. § 17-108 codifies penalty for destroying registration records.

§ 16.1-05-06 codifies challenging right to vote with affidavit alternative (though primary section repealed; cure procedure preserved via § 16.1-01-04.1 set-aside ballot process). § 16.1-13-34 codifies provisional ballots for voters voting after court-extended poll closing. § 16.1-07-18 codifies ballot-left-by-voter cure. Cure procedure codified though distributed across sections.

§ 6-8 codifies right to guidance/assistance. § 6-11(2) codifies known-voter cure: if voter cannot show ID, the vote-receiver may confirm identity if the voter is known. § 2-8 codifies voter-roll error correction. Cure procedure at the polls codified.

Art. 27 codifies the supplementary list inscription procedure for voters not on permanent list.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section defines voter misconduct crimes (voter fraud), not a cure procedure for voters lacking ID at polls. It contains no provisions addressing how election officials should handle voters who arrive without ID, what alternatives (provisional ballot, affidavit, signature match) are available, or how voters can cure missing identification. The criterion requires a defined statutory cure procedure for ID rejection; this section addresses criminal penalties only.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 66 codifies the ID requirement but does not codify a provisional-ballot/affidavit cure procedure for voters arriving without ID — if you don't present a listed ID, you cannot vote.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 228 addresses the administrative forwarding and handling of declaration vote envelopes by electoral officers—a purely procedural-logistical matter concerning chain of custody and reconciliation of voting materials. It contains no provisions addressing voter identification requirements, acceptance or rejection of voters, provisional ballots, affidavits, return-with-ID procedures, or any cure mechanism for a voter arriving without ID at the poll. The criterion concerns at-polls cure procedures for identification defects; this section is entirely silent on that topic.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 13 transparency framework — not at-polls cure. No provisional-ballot/affidavit cure procedure codified.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 49 addresses procedures for blind voters using Braille to register and vote, not cure procedures for voters arriving without identification at polls. The section specifies the mechanism for signature/mark authentication for blind voters (Braille letters, witness requirements from blind-service officials) but contains no language establishing a cure procedure, provisional ballot mechanism, affidavit option, return-with-ID pathway, or signature-match fallback for voters lacking ID at the polling place. The criterion's topic (at-polls cure for missing ID) is entirely absent from this section.

No matching sections in corpus.

The statute provides a cure pathway (confirmation from competent state body) for voters not on the rolls, but does not address the distinct scenario of a voter WHO IS on the rolls but arrives WITHOUT valid ID. The section requires ID verification under 'special laws' (by reference) but specifies no cure procedure (provisional ballot, affidavit, signature match, or return-with-ID option) for ID failures. The cure applies only to roster omission, not ID absence.

“Ako birač nije upisan u izvadak iz popisa birača, predsjednik biračkog odbora ili od njega ovlašteni član neće mu dozvoliti glasovanje, osim ako birač svoje biračko pravo na tom biračkom mjestu ne dokaže potvrdom nadležnog državnog tijela.”

No matching sections in corpus.

The statute provides a provisional ballot mechanism for voters whose eligibility cannot be determined (§ 4948(b)) and permits voters to vote provisionally even without proof of identity (§ 4948(c)). However, the statute does NOT define a cure procedure allowing such voters to later supply ID to cure the defect. Instead, § 4948(h)(6) mandates that provisional ballots cast without suitable identification are simply set aside and not tallied—effectively disenfranchising the voter with no remedy. A statutory cure procedure would require the voter to have an opportunity to provide ID after the election to validate the ballot, but this statute contemplates only rejection.

“Where the person who voted by provisional ballot did not show suitable identification at the polling place, the ballot shall be set aside, not opened and the votes not tallied.”

§ 50 codifies that valgstyrere may decide who is in the polling room. § 12a codifies Valgnævnet authority. Cure procedure for voter-roll errors at the polls is more limited than US-HAVA framework; corrections under § 22 must be made by the municipal council.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section (§ BWO § 88) addresses the procurement and provision of ballot papers, forms, and administrative documents for election officials. It does not address voter identification, voter challenges at polling places, or cure procedures for voters who arrive without ID. The section is entirely about material supply and distribution logistics, not voter verification or remedial procedures.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 20 addresses the administrative procedures for candidate nomination and registration (party list submissions, candidate announcements, and validation by the election board), not voter identification or at-polls procedures for voters lacking ID. The section contains no provisions regarding cure procedures for voters arriving without identification documents, provisional ballots, affidavits, signature matching, or any at-polls remedy mechanism.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 92 addresses the procedural handling of early/postal ballots—seal checks, ballot counting, storage, and routing to correct polling wards. It does not address identification requirements, ID-related rejections, or cure procedures for voters who arrive at polls without ID. The criterion concerns at-polls cure procedures for ID deficiencies; this section governs postal ballot receipt and provisional examination only.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section concerns retention and disposal timelines for county election records post-election. It contains no procedural rules governing what happens when a voter arrives at the polls without identification, nor does it define any cure mechanism (provisional ballot, affidavit, return-with-ID, or signature match procedures). The section is entirely about record management, not voter check-in or ID challenges.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 65 governs postal voting procedures for electors on the postal voters list, specifically the process for completing and sealing ballot papers with an authorised person. It does not address in-person polling place voting or any cure procedure for voters arriving without ID at polling stations. The section prescribes statutory procedure for postal voters' identity declaration and witnessing, but contains no cure mechanism for at-polls voters lacking ID.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

This section statutorily establishes a provisional ballot procedure for voters whose eligibility or registration is in question at the polling place, and mandates written instructions about ballot-counting status and reasons for non-counting. However, it does not clearly address cure—that is, what steps a voter must take *after* casting a provisional ballot to remedy an ID deficiency and ensure the ballot is counted. The statute creates the mechanism but does not enumerate the cure process itself (e.g., deadline for producing ID, how to submit it, or affidavit alternatives).

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 97 is a penal provision addressing electoral offenses and voter intimidation; it contains no cure procedure for voters who arrive at the polls without identification. The section sets criminal penalties for coercion and regulates opinion polling but does not establish any statutory at-polls procedure for handling incomplete or missing voter identification.

Article 50 provides a statutory alternative identification procedure (national ID card + attestation) for voters who arrive at the polls without an electoral card, which addresses the core question. However, the statute does not define what happens if a voter cannot produce either the national ID or the attestation at the polling place itself—i.e., no provisional ballot, affidavit, or other at-polls cure mechanism is specified. The remedy described in Articles 49–50 is pre-election (obtaining a duplicate or receipt in advance), not an on-the-day cure.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 791 addresses criminal penalties and violations related to absentee ballot handling and fraud, but does not define any cure procedure for voters arriving at polling places without ID. It contains no reference to provisional ballots, affidavits, return-with-ID procedures, or signature-match protocols that would apply at the polls. This section is entirely penal in character and does not establish procedural remedies for voter identification challenges.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 46 addresses the printing, security, distribution, and collection of voting documents but contains no procedure for curing a voter who arrives at the polls without identification. The statute describes what happens before election day (document issuance, delivery, collection) but does not enumerate or define any at-polls remedy such as provisional ballots, affidavits, signature matching, or return-with-ID procedures for voters lacking ID on polling day.

The statute permits voting without ID only via a prior Tribunal Electoral resolution—a pre-election judicial authorization, not an at-polls cure procedure. No cure mechanism (provisional ballot, affidavit, signature-match, return-with-ID) is defined for a voter who arrives at the polling place without ID and without such a judicial resolution. The section addresses ID errors and alterations post-hoc (collection and incident reporting) but does not establish a statutory cure path for credential-less voters encountered on election day.

The statute provides a cure-adjacent procedure allowing voters to cast affidavit ballots at the polls and to later ascertain whether their votes were counted and why they were not. However, the statute does not define what happens *after* a voter learns their affidavit ballot was rejected—there is no statutory procedure for the voter to cure the defect (e.g., by later providing ID or resolving registration issues). The statute addresses post-election notice and inquiry rights but not cure remedies.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 60 establishes the State Registry of Voters and its administration but contains no cure procedure for voters arriving without identification at polling stations. The section addresses voter registration data, data sources, and registry maintenance, not remedial mechanisms when identification is missing or deficient. A cure procedure (provisional ballot, affidavit, signature verification, or return-with-ID option) would require separate statutory language addressing what happens when a voter cannot produce required ID.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article J 25 establishes a clear statutory requirement for valid identification and specifies that voters without valid ID are denied access to the poll ('wordt de kiezer niet toegelaten tot de stemming'). However, the statute provides no cure procedure—no provisional ballot option, no affidavit mechanism, no opportunity to return with ID, no signature-match alternative, or any other remedial pathway. The voter is simply denied voting rights without recourse.

The statute mandates a written notice informing voters how to access information about ballot acceptance and rejection reasons, which establishes part of a post-election review mechanism. However, the section does not define the substantive cure procedure itself—it does not specify what happens if a voter arrives without ID, what options are available (affidavit, return-with-ID, signature match), or how the voter can cure a defect. The statute references section 4 of P.L.2004, c.88 (C.19:61-4) but does not itself enumerate the cure mechanism, leaving the procedural details to that external citation.

“the member of the district board shall hand to the voter the written notice of instructions on how the voter may access information regarding whether the ballot of the individual is accepted for counting, and if the vote is not counted, the reason for the rejection of the ballot”

This section defines when provisional ballots are counted or rejected (including non-signature and registration issues), but does not address the specific procedural cure mechanism for a voter who arrives without required ID at the polls. The statute establishes rejection conditions (§B–G) and administrative recordkeeping (§H), but contains no enumerated cure pathway (e.g., provisional ballot casting, affidavit completion, return-with-ID deadline) for the ID-deficient voter. The section also delegates rule-making authority to the Secretary of State (§I) rather than statutorily defining the cure procedure, leaving discretionary gaps in the voter's navigable remedies.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: ORS § 255.075 governs notice and publication procedures for district elections to elect board members. It contains no language addressing voter identification requirements, cure procedures for voters without ID, provisional ballots, affidavits, signature matching, or any remedy available to voters rejected for lack of identification at the polls. The criterion concerns at-polls ID cure procedure; this section is entirely procedural about election notice and does not touch identification or cure mechanisms.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 299 governs the registration and notification procedures for electoral committees and candidate nomination, not voter identification or cure procedures at polling places. It contains no provisions addressing what happens when a voter arrives without ID, provisional ballots, affidavits, return-with-ID procedures, or signature matching. This section is entirely unrelated to the criterion topic.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 22 governs pre-election court correction of voter-list entries — not at-polls cure procedure.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 6 establishes who may apply for registration as a voter and what identity documents are acceptable for registration purposes, but it does not address or define any cure procedure for a voter who arrives at the polling place without ID. The criterion asks specifically about at-polls cure procedures (provisional ballots, affidavits, return-with-ID options, signature match procedures), which this registration section does not contemplate or enumerate. No statutorily-defined cure mechanism is present in this text.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 85(4) addresses identity disputes when documents are presented, but establishes no cure procedure for voters who arrive without ID at all. The statute specifies acceptable ID forms (DNI, passport, driver's license with photo, or residency card for foreigners) in section 1, but provides no statutory remedy—such as provisional balloting, affidavit signing, return-with-ID procedures, or signature-matching alternatives—for voters lacking these documents. The doubt-resolution mechanism operates only post-presentation of documents, not for those arriving without ID.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: No candidate codifies an at-polls cure procedure for missing ID — Turkish elections require ID presentation before voting, with no provisional/affidavit alternative. The cited articles (Madde 94/C, 94/E, 97, 16, etc.) cover overseas voting and reconciliation, not at-polls cure.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 7.53 covers municipal canvass; § 9.01 recount. No at-polls ID-cure procedure surfaced. Wisconsin's provisional-ballot/affidavit cure for missing ID lives in § 6.79 (Ch. 6, not ingested).