Public verification artifact

§ 70 codifies that 'when the vote count is concluded, the result is entered in the polling book, which is signed by the valgstyrere, and the result is communicated to those present.' § 102 codifies Ministry publication of results in Statstidende (official gazette). § 73 codifies fintælling protocol entry. § 95 codifies parallel for referendums. Public verification artifacts codified.

§ 181 codifies that the result is announced and the announcement (kuulutus) published in the Finnish Statute Book (Suomen säädöskokoelma). § 94 / § 95 codify result confirmation + publication. § 98 codifies entry of the result in the protocol. § 145 codifies public announcement of seat counts. Public verification artifacts codified.

“Helsingin vaalipiirilautakunnan on heti ilmoitettava oikeusministeriölle vaalien tulos ja annettava tuloksesta kuulutus, joka julkaistaan Suomen säädöskokoelmassa.”

§ 16.1-15-09 codifies that voting systems must generate printed zero-state records and end-state records (totals for each candidate, each measure, public counter), all certified by inspector + judges. § 16.1-06-15 codifies sealed retention of testing materials. § 16.1-07-13.1 codifies signature verification. Public verification artifacts (signed printed records) explicitly codified.

14 kap. 25 § codifies that 'the election result shall be announced by posting on the agency's physical bulletin board AND published on the agency's website' — public-verification artifact statutorily codified. 13 kap. 4 § codifies announcement of canvass time/place. 15 kap. 8 § codifies parallel for appeals. 2 kap. 8 § codifies party-designation publication in Post- och Inrikes Tidningar. Multi-channel public verification.

“valresultatet kungöras genom att det anslås på myndighetens fysiska anslagstavla och publiceras på myndighetens webbplats.”

Cal. Elec. Code § 15104(a) makes the processing of vote-by-mail ballot return envelopes 'open to the public, both prior to and after the election' and § 15104(b) requires grand-jury + party representatives to be present. § 19273 makes the VVPAT the official paper record. Together these constitute a public-verification surface, though not a single downloadable signed package.

§ 48³(7) requires publication of the voter application, the vote verification application and website integrity data before voting; § 48⁸(7) adds publication of the system source code. Estonia codifies a public verification toolset, though not a single signed downloadable package of certificates, device records and result signatures.

“Prior to the start of electronic voting, the State Electoral Office publishes the voter application, the vote verification application and the data necessary for ensuring the authenticity and integrity of the website on the election website.”

Article 34 codifies public posting of voter lists at PECs. Article 76 codifies CEC publication of summarised results. Article 23 codifies precinct establishment with public participation. Building blocks of public verification, though not a single downloadable signed package.

§ 21-2-379.25 codifies ballot-design programming verification by superintendent. § 21-2-379.11 codifies tabulation procedure. § 21-2-379.6 codifies maintenance. § 21-2-72 (not in FTS top-5 for this datapoint) codifies that primary and election records are open to public. Building blocks of public verification, though not a single signed downloadable package.

10 ILCS 5/24C-2 defines 'audit trail' / 'audit capacity' as a continuous record from ballot creation through tabulation. Trail exists but no codified public-verification artifact (e.g. cryptographic receipt) for voters.

KRS 117.125(23) requires every approved voting system to 'produce a real-time audit log record... and produce a paper record with a manual audit capacity which shall be available as an official record for any recount,' and (14) to preserve the paper ballot as an official record available for any audit. KRS 117.383(8) makes the hand-to-eye audit publicly viewable and video-streamed. Verification artifacts are codified, though not consolidated into a single downloadable public verification package.

Lithuania publishes election results, preliminary returns and audited party-finance statements on the Central Electoral Commission's website (§ 25, § 85, § 73), but there is no downloadable cryptographically-signed verification package with device records and result signatures.

§ 206.80 codifies electronic-voting-system requirements including the permanent-paper-ballot mandate. § 206.88 codifies SoS verification recounts reported to the canvassing board. § 204B.275 codifies the central election reporting system (publicly accessible unofficial results). § 201.022 codifies the statewide registration system. Building blocks of public verification codified, though not a single signed downloadable package.

§ 13-15-113 requires a precinct-level reconciliation spreadsheet (ballots issued, cast, accepted, rejected per precinct) to be posted publicly to the county election website, and a statewide comprehensive reconciliation report to be published; a public verification artifact, though without cryptographic certificates, device records or result signatures.

“The spreadsheet must be posted to the county election website in a place accessible by all members of the public”

§ 3-103 codifies state board promulgation of standards for computerized record-keeping with database sharing. § 9-211 audit publishes comparison reports filed with state board. § 9-120 (not in FTS top-5) codifies returns of canvass; § 9-122 public proclamation; § 9-126 unofficial tally; § 15-140 transmission of publicly available data to the NY voting and elections database. Building blocks of public verification, though not a single signed downloadable package.

§ 21-8 codifies that before 21:00 on election day, no information on election results may be published. § 10-11(5) codifies announcement of second-count results. § 21-6 codifies election-statistics reporting to the Ministry and Statistics Norway. § 11-6 codifies publication of the Storting election protocol. Public verification artifacts (results + protocols) are codified.

§ 12-25-31 codifies financial-statement forms and public-record requirements. § 12-4-9 codifies master registration file public inspection. § 12-4-19.7 codifies confirmation mailing notice. Public verification artifacts codified through public-records framework; no single signed downloadable package codified.

§ 129.023 codifies a public logic-and-accuracy test producing signed written statements by the testing board, with public notice and online publication of any unsuccessful-test explanation; § 66.005 requires posting a post-election reconciliation on the county website; § 127.304 requires publishing risk-limiting-audit results online. Multiple public verification artifacts codified, though not consolidated into a single downloadable verification package.

Art. II-79 codifies election-process stages with public-record obligations. Art. III-179 / IV-254 codify continuous commission meetings producing publicly-available protocols. Art. III-187 / IV-282 codify promulgation of results in Holos Ukrainy + Uriadovyy Courier + CEC website. Building blocks of public verification, though not a single signed downloadable package.

Wis. Stat. § 5.91 codifies the requisites for approval of ballots, voting devices, and automatic tabulating equipment — including certification by the elections commission. § 5.905 codifies software-component disclosure. Combined with § 7.41 public-access, Wisconsin has the building blocks but no single downloadable verification package mandate.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section governs periodic updating of the statewide voter registration database through change-of-address verification procedures. It contains no requirement, mandate, or reference to downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures—all elements central to the criterion of public verification artifacts for election integrity.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The section requires a paper record of each electronically generated ballot that can be reviewed and used for recounts, but it does not mandate a downloadable public package containing certificates, device records, and result signatures. The criterion requires specific technical artifacts for public verification; the statute addresses voter-level ballot verification and recount capability, which are distinct requirements.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 16-1023 addresses digital impersonation of candidates and other persons, establishing civil remedies through declaratory relief. It contains no provisions regarding downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, result signatures, or any election verification artifacts. The section is entirely outside the scope of election integrity verification procedures.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses poll worker procedures for verifying voter identity and registration at the polling place. It contains no provisions regarding downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures—all of which are technical election security artifacts unrelated to voter verification procedures.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 66 codifies voter-identity verification (ID card, biometric/non-biometric passport, etc.) — voter authentication, not a public verification package. Armenia does not codify a downloadable signed verification package.

The section mandates publication of verification statements about software assessment and assurance, but these are limited to text statements confirming software version and assessment completion. The statute does not require a downloadable public package containing certificates, device records, and result signatures—the specific technical artifacts required by the criterion.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section concerns the announcement of a runoff election (engere Wahl) by the federal election authority through public posting and internet notification. It addresses the timing and content of electoral announcements but does not establish any requirement for downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures. The provision is about voter notification, not technical audit or verification artifacts.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 116 covers signature-sheet submission for referendum initiative. Article 137 (signature collection results). Article 117 (calling referendum). Article 61 (presidential candidate nomination). None codifies a downloadable signed verification package for vote results.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 180bis addresses the registration procedures for Belgian voters living abroad through consular posts, including application forms, voter modes, and appeals processes. It contains no provisions regarding downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures that would be required for public verification of election results.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 87 addresses observer access to vote counting and the delivery of tally sheets (boletins) to parties, but does not mandate a downloadable public package containing certificates, device records, or result signatures. The section focuses on in-person verification by party representatives rather than public digital artifacts.

The section mandates distribution of signed protocol copies with result signatures to authorized parties and requires scanning/transmission of protocols and technical device records to the Central Election Commission, but does not explicitly mandate a downloadable public package containing all these materials as an integrated, publicly accessible digital artifact.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section prohibits photographing, copying, or distributing marked ballots, with narrow exceptions for persons with visual impairments and legal proceedings. It addresses ballot secrecy and prevents evidence of vote choice from being created or shared, which is contrary to the criterion's requirement for a downloadable public package of election integrity artifacts (certificates, device records, and result signatures). The statute does not mandate or contemplate any public verification package.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 56 of the PRC Election Law concerns the termination of positions held by standing committee members and specialized committee members of people's congresses when they resign. It has no relevance to downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures related to election verification.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses voter registration cancellation procedures, confirmation cards, and inactivity marking. It does not address downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures—topics that pertain to election verification and auditing infrastructure, not registration management.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses provisional ballot casting procedures and voter verification of whether their specific ballot was counted, but does not mandate a downloadable public package containing certificates, device records, and result signatures. It concerns individual voter verification of provisional ballot status, not public cryptographic artifacts or election result signatures.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 28 addresses campaign periods and restrictions on electoral publicity during specific time windows. It contains no provisions regarding public verification artifacts, downloadable packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures—topics entirely unrelated to the section's scope of regulating campaign messaging timing.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section concerns unaffiliated candidate ballot access requirements, including registration timelines, nominating petitions, and background checks. It contains no provisions related to election verification artifacts, downloadable packages, device records, result signatures, or any post-election verification materials.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 98.077 voter signature update. Off-topic.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section of the French Electoral Code concerns the establishment of proxy voting (procuration) procedures, including in-person requirements, teleproceeding options, and delegation arrangements. It does not address election auditing, verification artifacts, certificates, device records, result signatures, or any downloadable public packages related to election integrity verification.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section governs the announcement and verification of candidate nominations before election day, not post-election result reporting or provision of downloadable verification artifacts. It addresses publication of candidate names and communication to electoral boards, which does not involve certificates, device records, or result signatures related to vote tabulation.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses replacement ballot procedures for voters whose ballots are destroyed, spoiled, or lost. It does not address public verification artifacts, downloadable packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures. The section is about ballot replacement administration, not election verification or public transparency of election records.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section governs political organisations' access to electoral registers for monitoring elections and voter outreach. It does not address downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures—the technical artifacts required for public verification under criterion 4.1.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 34-433 addresses the accuracy of voter registration information by requiring state entities to furnish data to the secretary of state for verification purposes. It does not mandate any downloadable public package, certificates, device records, or result signatures. The section is about internal data collection and comparison for registration accuracy, not public verification artifacts related to election results or voting devices.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 3-5-2.1-43 defines 'expedited basis' for voter registration processing timelines. It does not address public verification artifacts, certificates, device records, result signatures, or any downloadable packages related to election result verification or citizen verification. This section is about registration processing speed, not post-election verification infrastructure.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses absentee ballot applications and voter verification procedures for requesting ballots. It does not address cryptographic certificates, device records, result signatures, or any downloadable public packages related to election verification artifacts. The section concerns voter eligibility and ballot request procedures, not public election verification mechanisms.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the administrative provision of copies of the Register of Political Parties to returning officers in the context of Dáil elections. It does not concern public verification artifacts, certificates, device records, result signatures, or downloadable packages for citizen verification of election results.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 25-433 addresses mail ballot procedures, including mailing, return envelopes, signature verification, and canvassing, but contains no provision requiring a downloadable public package of certificates, device records, or result signatures. The statute focuses on operational procedures for mail voting rather than public verification artifacts or election transparency mechanisms.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses voter register familiarization and correction procedures, not the creation or publication of downloadable cryptographic packages containing certificates, device records, or result signatures. It pertains to voter list management and access, which is a different topic from the technical verification artifacts required by criterion 4.1.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: FTS surfaced postal-envelope vote-counting provisions; Latvia produces paper vote-counting reports and election procedure logs but codifies no downloadable public verification package of certificates, device records and result signatures.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the disposition and recording of notices of candidacy, qualifying fees, and nomination petitions—matters of candidate registration and filing. It contains no provisions regarding downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, result signatures, or any election verification artifacts related to vote tabulation or ballot security.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 163 addresses the public proclamation of election results by the presiding officer but does not mandate creation or distribution of downloadable verification packages containing certificates, device records, or result signatures. The section requires only oral or public announcement of results, not the provision of cryptographic or technical verification artifacts.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 153–154 concerns voter identification procedures and ballot secrecy measures at polling locations. It does not address downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures—the technological and transparency artifacts required by criterion 4.1.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses verification and certification of voter initiative petitions—specifically the oath-taking and notarization process for petition circulators. It does not govern voting systems, election results, device records, certificates related to voting infrastructure, or result signatures. The criterion asks about a downloadable public package of election-related technical artifacts, which is entirely outside the scope of this petition verification statute.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section describes the mechanics of voter marking and ballot validity in a single transferable vote system, and the secrecy of the voting process. It contains no provisions relating to downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, result signatures, or any form of electronic verification artifacts or public audit materials.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses campaign contribution methods (checks, credit cards, cash, and electronic payments) and verification of contributor identity. It does not concern voting system verification artifacts, certificates, device records, or result signatures—the subject matter of criterion 4.1. The statute is entirely off-topic for public verification of election results.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses prosecution procedures and criminal trial dispositions for violations of election law chapters, not the creation or publication of downloadable public verification packages for election results, device records, or certificates. It is procedurally focused on court handling of cases rather than election integrity verification artifacts.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses registration record verification through house-to-house canvasses and other checking methods, but does not mandate any downloadable public package containing certificates, device records, or result signatures. It is entirely unrelated to the criterion of providing public verification artifacts for election results.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses verification of voter registration applicant information through an agreement with the Social Security Administration. It does not concern public verification artifacts, downloadable packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures related to election integrity auditing or transparency. The section is entirely unrelated to the criterion being evaluated.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses signature verification on new party and independent candidate petitions between county and city election authorities. It does not address downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures related to election auditing or verification—the topics encompassed by criterion 4.1 on citizen verifiability.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section concerns the eligibility, qualifications, and conduct requirements for members of the Central Electoral Commission. It does not address election verification mechanisms, downloadable packages of certificates, device records, result signatures, or any technical infrastructure for public verification of election results.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses signature verification and identification requirements for mail-in ballot envelopes but does not mandate or address downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures. It is about voter identification and ballot authentication procedures, not public verifiability artifacts or cryptographic verification systems.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: NRS § 295.260 addresses verification of petition signatures by county or city clerks, not public verification artifacts related to election results, device records, or certificates. This section pertains to the administrative process of validating petition signatures during the petition certification phase, which is entirely separate from the post-election verification and transparency requirements contemplated by criterion 4.1.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the physical delivery, receipt, and inspection of ballot packages before election day. It does not mention downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, result signatures, or any digital verifiability artifacts. The section is entirely about ballot chain-of-custody procedures, not public verification mechanisms.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses voting machine requirements including voter-verified paper records and audit trails, but does not mandate a downloadable public package containing certificates, device records, and result signatures. The statute requires paper records for verification and manual audits, but does not specify or require public downloadable cryptographic or digital packages with certificates and signed results.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the use of voter electronic-mail addresses for communication about the voting process and military-overseas ballot delivery. It does not address public verification artifacts, downloadable packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures—all elements central to the citizen verifiability criterion.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses criminal history record checks for county board of elections employees. It does not discuss downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, result signatures, or any public verification artifacts related to election results or processes.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses electronic transmission of voter registration database changes and verification procedures within election administration systems. It does not address public verification artifacts, downloadable packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures—the core elements of criterion 4.1, which concerns post-election verifiability and transparency.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses voter electronic-mail addresses for military-overseas voters and ballot delivery procedures. It does not mandate or address downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures related to election verification or auditing.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses voter registration record verification and updates based on postal service data. It does not mandate any downloadable public package, certificates, device records, or result signatures as required by the criterion. The section is about address verification procedures, not public verification artifacts or election result documentation.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 1307 addresses the voting process for military and emergency civilian absentee voters, including application procedures, ballot execution, and the custody of sealed envelopes. It does not address public verification artifacts, downloadable packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures. The section is focused on administrative procedures for absentee voting, not election result verification or transparency mechanisms.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section describes the duties of territorial and municipal election commissions, including managing ballot printing, registering candidates, and announcing results. However, it does not address the creation, publication, or availability of downloadable public packages containing certificates, device records, or result signatures. The section is about commission responsibilities for election administration, not public verification artifacts.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the public posting of election results via notice at courthouse doors, but does not mandate any downloadable public package, certificates, device records, or result signatures. It covers physical posting of results, not the digital artifacts or verifiable cryptographic materials required by the criterion.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the Board of Elections' powers to regulate campaign finance matching funds, conduct investigations into alleged violations, and issue findings—it has no connection to election auditing artifacts, voting device records, certificates, or result signatures. The criterion asks about technical verification mechanisms for election results; this statute concerns campaign finance enforcement procedures.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses confiscation of goods and money used in violations related to contraventions or crimes (articles 55, 57-62), and marks a transition to final provisions. It does not address public verification artifacts, downloadable packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures related to election verification.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 60 (supervisory services) covers financial oversight, not voter-verification package. Article 57-59 cover electoral funds. Articles 33, 38 cover candidate registration. No downloadable signed verification package for voting results codified.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: MP Election Law Article 68 governs voter ID at the polls (ink-marking finger), not public verification of cast votes.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 51-52 addresses counting procedures and verification of seals on ballot boxes, but contains no reference to downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures. The section focuses on physical ballot verification and irregularity documentation, not digital public artifacts.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses political party certification and decertification procedures, including petition requirements and organizational requirements. It contains no provisions regarding downloadable public packages, certificates related to election results, device records, or result signatures. The statute is entirely focused on party registration and organizational compliance, not election verification artifacts.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the posting and distribution of election tally records (acta de escrutinio) to candidates and administrators, but does not mandate a downloadable public package containing certificates, device records, and result signatures as contemplated by the criterion. The requirement is for physical copies delivered to representatives and designated persons, not a digital/downloadable verification artifact.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 2-6-202 addresses absentee ballot procedures, including application requirements, signature verification, and ballot mailing. It contains no provisions regarding downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures. This section is entirely focused on voter application and ballot processing workflows, not on public verification artifacts or cryptographic records.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Anayasa Article 39 covers defamation defense — unrelated.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 56 of PPERA 2000 addresses political party donation verification and acceptance procedures. It contains no requirements related to downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures—topics relevant to election result verification infrastructure. The section is about party finance compliance, not election integrity artifacts.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 20507 addresses voter registration administration, confirmation procedures, and removal of ineligible voters. It contains no provisions about downloadable public packages, certificates, device records, or result signatures related to election verification or audit artifacts.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section pertains to proposition information pamphlets for initiative and referendum petitions, addressing the preparation and publication of voter arguments and fiscal/legal impact statements. It does not concern election verification artifacts, device records, certificates, or result signatures. The criterion asks about downloadable public packages for post-election verification, which is entirely outside the scope of this statute section about pre-election voter information materials.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 2154 codifies the statewide voter checklist but no public, downloadable verification package of certificates, device records, and result signatures.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section regulates paid political advertisements in newspapers and periodicals, requiring disclosure of advertisement sponsors and retention of identity proof. It does not address election auditing, device records, result signatures, or any downloadable public verification packages related to election integrity or vote counting.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: RCW 29A.60.235 requires publication of election reconciliation reports (ballot counts and auditor data) on the county auditor's website and secretary of state's website, but does not mandate a downloadable public package containing certificates, device records, or result signatures. The statute addresses transparency of vote counts, not cryptographic verification artifacts or machine records needed for independent verification.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section governs inaugural event fundraising, contribution limits, and financial reporting for candidates elected to statewide office. It does not address election verification artifacts, device records, result signatures, or any downloadable public packages related to election integrity or vote verification. The criterion concerns post-election verification infrastructure, which is entirely outside the scope of this inauguration finance statute.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section concerns the procedural requirements for municipal referendum petitions—specifically petition signature collection, filing deadlines, and content requirements. It has no bearing on election system verification artifacts, certificates, device records, or result signatures. The criterion addresses post-election audit and verification mechanisms for election integrity, which is entirely outside the scope of this referendum ordinance statute.