Enumerated acceptable IDs

The statute exhaustively enumerates seven distinct categories of acceptable photo identification in subsection (a), each with specific characteristics (e.g., photo requirement, issuing authority). This leaves no discretion to election officials to accept or reject forms of ID not on this list. The enumeration is set directly in statute rather than delegated to administrative rule-making.

The statute exhaustively enumerates acceptable ID forms in multiple categories: driver's license, state ID, photo ID, birth certificate, passport, hunting/fishing license, and specific government documents (utility bill, bank statement, paycheck, government check, or other government document). Each category is set forth in statute with specific requirements (e.g., 'current and valid,' 'current address'). No discretion is delegated to administrators to add, remove, or redefine acceptable forms.

“current utility bill, bank statement, paycheck, government check, or other government document; an item described in this sub-subparagraph must show the name and current address of the voter”

Article 86 exhaustively enumerates acceptable ID forms in statute: libreta de enrolamiento, libreta cívica, and documento nacional de identidad. The statute specifies which combinations are acceptable (e.g., DNI paired with duplicated civic documents is permitted; civic documents paired with DNI when the registry shows DNI is not), leaving no discretion to administrators on which documents satisfy the requirement.

The statute delegates acceptable ID forms to a specific statutory reference (A.R.S. § 16-579, subsection A, paragraph 1) rather than leaving the determination to administrative discretion. This creates a bounded, statutorily-enumerated set of acceptable documents, fulfilling the procedural clarity requirement. The additional statement that a valid Arizona driver license or nonoperating identification satisfies the requirement provides further statutory grounding.

“Any of the identifying documents prescribed in section 16-579, subsection A, paragraph 1 constitutes satisfactory proof of location of residence.”

The statute exhaustively enumerates acceptable ID forms for first-time voters who registered by mail: photographic identification or specific named documents (utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document). The list is set in statute rather than left to administrative discretion, and the categories are defined with sufficient specificity to guide both voters and election officials.

Electoral Code Article 66 exhaustively enumerates the acceptable ID forms: 'an identification card, a biometric passport, a non-biometric passport, a temporary document replacing the passport or the identification card.' No administrator discretion to add other documents.

The statute exhaustively enumerates acceptable forms of photo identification (passport, national ID card, driver's license) by reference to statutory categories, not administrator discretion. The phrase 'zum Beispiel' (for example) indicates these are illustrative categories of documents explicitly defined in statute, leaving no room for administrative determination of what constitutes acceptable identification.

“ihre Identität durch ein mit Lichtbild ausgestattetes Identitätsdokument (zum Beispiel Reisepass, Personalausweis, Führerschein) nachgewiesen hat”

The statute exhaustively enumerates the single acceptable form of identification for voters in Fourons and Comines-Warneton: a special model summons letter (lettre de convocation). This form is statutorily defined and mandatory, leaving no discretion to administrators regarding which documents may be accepted.

Чл. 263 enumerates acceptable IDs: personal ID card, green passport (for those who haven't replaced old documents), and for expired/lost/stolen/in-process IDs: certificate of ID issuance. For overseas voters: passport, ID card, or military card per Bulgarian Personal Documents Act. For ships: passenger ID/passport or sailor's passport.

The section statutorily enumerates the acceptable forms of identification for military electors: either one Canadian Forces-issued photo ID with name and service number, or two pieces of identification of types authorized under section 211.3. While the section cross-references section 211.3 for the second category, it is delegated to statute (not discretion), providing clear enumeration of acceptable ID forms rather than leaving the determination to officer judgment.

The statute exhaustively enumerates the acceptable forms of identifying information for mail registration: Colorado driver's license, state ID card issued by the department of revenue, or the last four digits of social security number. The provision also addresses those without a social security number by directing the secretary of state to assign a registration number. This is a statutory enumeration with no discretion left to administrators regarding which ID forms are acceptable.

The statute exhaustively enumerates four acceptable forms of identifying information for mail voter registration: photo ID, utility/financial documents, driver's license number, or Social Security number. The options are set forth in statute with specific, non-discretionary language ('may submit'), leaving no room for administrator discretion to expand or contract the acceptable forms.

“any person who is applying, by mail, to register to vote for the first time in this state may submit as part of such voter registration application: (1) A copy of a current and valid photo identification, (2) a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck or government document that shows the name and address of the voter, (3) a valid Connecticut motor vehicle operator's license number, or (4) the last four digits of the individual's Social Security number”

The statute exhaustively enumerates acceptable identification forms for mail-in registration: a current and valid photo ID, or one of five specific documentary alternatives (utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document showing name and address). The list is closed and leaves no discretion to administrators to accept other forms. The procedure is set in statute, enumerated concretely, and applicable across the state.

“a copy of a current and valid photo identification or a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck or other government document that shows the name and address of the voter”

§ 48⁵ enumerates acceptable identification by statutory cross-reference — a document prescribed for digital identification under the Identity Documents Act, or an equivalent electronic identification means meeting eIDAS assurance level 'high'. In-person identity documents are likewise governed by the Identity Documents Act, not administrator discretion.

“The identity of a voter in the electronic voting system is verified by means of a document prescribed for digital identification of person as provided in the Identity Documents Act.”

§ 97.0535 enumerates the acceptable identification documents for HAVA-required ID verification: Florida DL, FL ID card, SSN, plus enumerated alternative documentation in (1)(b).

“Florida driver license, Florida identification card, or social security number”

The statute exhaustively enumerates the three acceptable forms of identity documentation for candidates (residence permit, passport, or national identity card) in article R128-1(3). The acceptable documents are set out in the statutory text itself, not delegated to administrative discretion.

“une copie de la carte de séjour, du passeport ou de la carte nationale d'identité du candidat”

§ 21-2-417 enumerates acceptable IDs: Georgia driver's license, free voter ID card (§ 21-2-417.1), valid US passport, government-employer photo ID, valid US military photo ID, valid tribal photo ID. Enumerated list codified.

The statute exhaustively enumerates the acceptable forms of ID for electronic voter registration: a current valid driver's license or identification card issued under Idaho's motor vehicle code (title 49). The statute does not delegate discretion to the secretary of state or county clerk to determine acceptable ID forms; it specifies the precise document types by statutory reference.

10 ILCS 5/4-105 enumerates acceptable IDs for first-time-by-mail voters: Illinois driver's license number, State ID card number, last 4 of SSN, or current/valid photo ID, utility bill, bank statement, government check, or government document with the voter's name + address.

“demonstrated by submission of the person's driver's license number or State identification card number or, if the person does not have either of those, verification by the last 4 digits of the person's social security number, a copy of a current and val”

The statute exhaustively enumerates exactly two acceptable forms of identification in subsection (2): an Indiana driver's license or an Indiana identification card for nondrivers, both issued under specified statutory references. The enumeration is statutory, specific, and leaves no discretion to administrators to accept alternative forms.

The statute exhaustively enumerates five specific forms of acceptable identification in subsection 2.a, with no discretion left to election officials regarding which forms qualify. Additionally, subsection 3 provides a narrowly-defined fallback procedure for registered voters unable to present the primary forms, including a voter ID card under section 48A.10A or other identification "sufficient to establish identity and residence under section 48A.7A, subsection 1, paragraph 'b'"—still grounded in statute rather than administrator discretion. The enumeration is clear and binding.

Section 106 amends Rule 5 to enumerate specific acceptable forms of identification for voter registration in statute: a certificate of naturalisation, a valid passport issued by the Minister for Foreign Affairs, a valid passport or national identity card issued by an EU Member State, or statutory declarations as alternatives when documents are unavailable. The enumeration is exhaustive and binding on the registration authority, leaving no discretion to accept alternative forms.

The statute exhaustively enumerates nine specific categories of acceptable photo identification in subsection (h)(1)(A)–(I), with clear criteria (name, photograph, expiration status). While subsection (g) permits the Secretary of State to adopt rules defining valid forms "with greater specificity," it explicitly preserves the statutory enumeration by stating the identification requirement "may not be altered." This leaves the enumerated list as the binding statutory baseline, not subject to discretionary narrowing or expansion.

“(h) (1) The following forms of identification shall be valid if the identification contains the name and photograph of the voter and has not expired. Expired documents shall be valid if the bearer of the document is 65 years of age or older: (A) A driver's license issued by Kansas or by another state or district of the United States; (B) a state identification card issued by Kansas or by another state or district of the United States; (C) a concealed carry of handgun license issued by Kansas or a concealed carry of handgun or weapon license issued by another state or district of the United States; (D) a United States passport; (E) an employee badge issued by a municipal, county, state, or federal government office or agency; (F) a military identification document issued by the United States; (G) a student identification card issued by an accredited postsecondary institution of education in the state of Kansas; (H) a public assistance identification card issued by a municipal, county, state, or federal government office or agency; or (I) an identification card issued by an Indian tribe.”

§ 34 codifies the documents used to identify voters and register them in the Voter List and Population Register — passport or personal identification card. § 52 enumerates polling-station documents (voter certificate, passport, or other document certifying identity and citizenship).

“according to the information of a document certifying citizenship (passport or personal identification card)”

The statute exhaustively enumerates acceptable forms of identification for voter registration in subsection A(5): Louisiana driver's license, Louisiana special identification card, last four digits of social security number, or—if none of those are available—a copy of valid photo ID or a copy of a document showing name and address (utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document). The enumeration is statutorily grounded and leaves no discretion to the registrar to accept other forms. Section J reinforces this by requiring that applications be complete only when applicants provide one of the enumerated forms.

The statute explicitly enumerates the acceptable form of identification for Luxembourg citizens residing abroad seeking to vote in European elections: a certified true copy of a valid passport. This enumeration is set in statute (not delegated to administrative discretion) and specifies exactly what document must be produced and by whom (a competent authority), leaving no room for administrator discretion in determining acceptable ID forms for this category of voter.

“Les électeurs luxembourgeois domiciliés à l'étranger doivent produire une copie certifiée conforme par une autorité compétente de leur passeport en cours de validité.”

The statute exhaustively enumerates the acceptable ID forms for this specific voting population (government officials, magistrates, law enforcement, military, and election commission members): mission order or equivalent document, voter card, and national identity card. The acceptable forms are specified in the statute itself with no discretion left to administrators regarding which documents qualify.

The statute exhaustively enumerates six categories of acceptable identification in subsection (a)(2), with specific characteristics defined for each form. The enumeration is direct and binding on election judges, leaving no discretion to add or subtract acceptable forms. The provision includes a broad fallback category (vi) that captures government and financial documents, further ensuring comprehensive coverage without administrative discretion.

The statute exhaustively enumerates acceptable ID forms in both in-person and absentee voting contexts: photo ID or documents showing name and address (utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document). The forms are specified in statute without discretionary language, leaving no room for administrative elaboration of what qualifies.

The statute exhaustively enumerates the acceptable identification forms for online voter registration authentication (four specific ID types plus SSN last-4 fallback), leaving no discretion to administrators on what counts.

“(a) The identification number for the applicant on any of the following: (i) A valid operator's or chauffeur's license issued under the Michigan vehicle code, 1949 PA 300, MCL 257.1 to 257.923. (ii) A valid official state personal identification card issued under 1972 PA 222, MCL 28.291 to 28.300. (iii) An enhanced driver license issued under the enhanced driver license and enhanced official state personal identification card act, 2008 PA 23, MCL 28.301 to 28.308. (iv) An enhanced official state personal identification card issued under the enhanced driver license and enhanced official state personal identification card act, 2008 PA 23, MCL 28.301 to 28.308. (b) If the applicant does not have an identification number for an identification as provided under subdivision (a), the last 4 digits of a valid Social Security number for the applicant.”

The statute exhaustively enumerates acceptable photo identification forms in subsection 1, listing four specific categories with detailed criteria, and explicitly prohibits acceptance of any other forms ('No form of personal photo identification other than the forms listed in this section shall be accepted'). This leaves no room for administrator discretion in determining which IDs qualify.

“Forms of personal photo identification that satisfy the requirements of this section are any one of the following: (1) Nonexpired Missouri driver's license; (2) Nonexpired or nonexpiring Missouri nondriver's license; (3) A document that satisfies all of the following requirements: (a) The document contains the name of the individual to whom the document was issued, and the name substantially conforms to the most recent signature in the individual's voter registration record; (b) The document shows a photograph of the individual; (c) The document includes an expiration date, and the document is not expired, or, if expired, the document expired after the date of the most recent general election; and (d) The document was issued by the United States or the state of Missouri; or (4) Any identification containing a photograph of the individual which is issued by the Missouri National Guard, the United States Armed Forces, including the Space Force, or the United States Department of Veteran Affairs to a member or former member of the Missouri National Guard or the United States Armed Forces, including the Space Force, and that is not expired or does not have an expiration date.”

Article 78(6) exhaustively enumerates the three acceptable identity documents in statute: citizen identity card, provisional identity card, and passport. The list is closed ("one of the following") and does not delegate further specification to the Central Electoral Commission beyond procedural implementation details. The acceptable forms are statutorily grounded and enumerated, satisfying the criterion.

§ 13-13-114 exhaustively enumerates the acceptable ID forms in statute (Montana driver's license, state ID, military ID, tribal photo ID, U.S. passport, concealed-carry permit, university/college student photo ID), plus a documentary alternative (utility bill etc. with photo ID).

“a Montana driver's license, Montana state identification card issued pursuant to 61-12-501, military identification card, tribal photo identification card, United States passport, Montana concealed carry permit”

The statute exhaustively enumerates the acceptable forms of identification for electronic voter registration: a valid Nebraska motor vehicle operator's license or state identification card. The acceptable ID forms are explicitly named in statute and not left to administrator discretion. This provides clear, statutorily-grounded enumeration of which documents qualify.

“An applicant who has a valid Nebraska motor vehicle operator's license or state identification card may use the application process to register to vote”

Nevada Statute § NRS 293.277(2) exhaustively enumerates the acceptable forms of identification in statutory text, listing five specific categories (voter registration card, driver's license, DMV ID, military ID, and any governmental ID with signature and physical description/picture). The enumeration is set in statute rather than delegated to administrator discretion, satisfying the procedural-clarity requirement.

The statute exhaustively enumerates all acceptable forms of photo identification (driver's licenses from any state, state ID cards, armed services cards, passports/passcards, and qualifying student IDs) with specific criteria for each form, including expiration date rules. The list is set in statute with no delegation to administrator discretion to add or remove forms.

“The following forms of identification bearing a photograph of the voter shall satisfy the identification requirements of paragraph I: (1) A driver's license issued by any state or the federal government. (2) An identification card issued under RSA 260:21, RSA 260:21-a, or RSA 260:21-b or a nondriver's identification card issued by the motor vehicles division, department, agency, or office of any other state. (3) A United States armed services identification card. (4) A United States passport or passcard. (5) A valid student identification card if: (A) The card is issued by: (i) A college, university, or career school in New Hampshire and approved to operate or licensed to operate in New Hampshire. (ii) A public high school in New Hampshire. (iii) A nonpublic high school in New Hampshire accredited by a private school accrediting agency that is recognized by the department of education. (iv) Dartmouth College. (v) A college or university operated by the university system of New Hampshire or the community college system of New Hampshire. (B) The card has either an expiration date or an issuance date that has not been exceeded by a period of more than 5 years”

The statute exhaustively enumerates acceptable ID forms in three categories (photo ID, documentary evidence with name and address, and verbal/written statement) with specific examples provided. The enumeration is set directly in statute with no delegation to administrative discretion, and the voter may choose among these specified forms.

§ 16.1-05-07 codifies poll-clerk ID verification: 'Before delivering a ballot to an individual in any election, the poll clerks shall require the individual to show a valid form of identification with the information required under section 16.1-01-04.1.' § 16.1-01-04.1 enumerates the IDs: ND DOT driver's license or non-driver ID, or tribal ID. Statutorily enumerated.

ORC 3505.18 codifies the ID requirement at polls: 'Ohio driver's license, state identification card, or interim identification form' — narrow enumeration in statute.

The statute exhaustively enumerates the acceptable ID form for electronic voter registration: a current and valid Oklahoma driver license or identification card issued by Service Oklahoma. No discretion is left to the administrator to accept alternative IDs or to modify the enumerated form.

The statute exhaustively enumerates the four acceptable forms of identification for electronic voter registration: driver license, driver permit, state identification card, and Social Security number. While the Secretary of State adopts implementing rules for the system, the acceptable ID forms themselves are statutorily defined and limited to these enumerated categories, leaving no discretion to accept other forms.

Article 35 § 1 and § 5 exhaustively enumerate the acceptable forms of identification in statute: valid Polish passports for Polish citizens abroad, valid passports or other identity documents for EU citizens, and valid Polish ID cards for certain EU/Schengen territories. The statute specifies which documents are acceptable and does not delegate enumeration to administrative discretion. § 4 addresses implementation procedures, but the core acceptable ID forms are statutorily fixed.

The statute exhaustively enumerates acceptable ID forms in a clear hierarchy: (1) identity card (bilhete de identidade), (2) any other official document with current photograph, (3) attestation by two eligible voter-citizens under oath, or (4) unanimous recognition by polling station members. The procedure is statutorily grounded with no discretion left to administrators regarding which forms are acceptable; all enumerated alternatives are available.

“Cada eleitor, apresentando-se perante a mesa, indica o número de inscrição no recenseamento e o nome e entrega ao presidente o bilhete de identidade, se o tiver. 2 — Na falta de bilhete de identidade, a identificação do eleitor faz-se por meio de qualquer outro documento oficial que contenha fotografia actualizada, ou através de dois cidadãos eleitores que atestem, sob compromisso de honra, a sua identidade, ou ainda por reconhecimento unânime dos membros da mesa.”

The statute exhaustively enumerates acceptable forms of ID in two categories (photo and non-photo documents) with specific examples, each listed in the statute itself rather than delegated to administrative discretion. While the phrase 'including without limitation' appears, the substantive enumeration—driver's license, passport, military ID, educational institution ID, birth certificate, social security card, and government-issued medical card—is statutorily grounded and specific enough to provide clear guidance to election officials and voters.

Art. 28 (EP elections) enumerates acceptable ID forms: in-country — ID card, provisional ID, ID booklet; abroad — diplomatic/service/simple/temporary passport or travel document or ID card; EU citizens — any ID + AEP residency proof.

The statute explicitly and exhaustively enumerates the acceptable forms of identification for electronic voter registration: a valid South Carolina driver's license or state identification card issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles. No discretion is granted to administrators to accept alternative forms or to modify the list. The requirement is set in statute and the acceptable IDs are enumerated without ambiguity.

“A person who is qualified to register to vote and who has a valid South Carolina driver's license or state identification card issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles may submit an application for voter registration electronically”

§ 12-18-6.1 codifies enumerated acceptable IDs: (1) SD driver's license or non-driver ID, (2) US passport or government photo ID, (3) tribal photo ID, (4) current student photo ID from SD high school or accredited higher-ed institution. Explicit enumeration codified.

The statute exhaustively enumerates the acceptable forms of identification: national identity document, passport, driver's license with photograph, and (for foreigners) residency card. The list is closed and specific, set directly in statutory text with no delegation to administrative discretion. The acceptable ID forms are not left to any administrator's judgment.

“la identificación del elector, que se realiza mediante documento nacional de identidad, pasaporte o permiso de conducir en que aparezca la fotografía del titular o, además, tratándose de extranjeros, con la tarjeta de residencia”

§ 63.0101 exhaustively enumerates the acceptable forms of photo identification (Texas driver's license, election identification certificate, DPS personal ID, US military ID, US citizenship certificate, US passport book/card, DPS handgun license) and the acceptable non-photo documents accompanying a reasonable-impediment declaration. The acceptable IDs are fixed by statute, not left to administrator discretion.

“The following documentation is an acceptable form of photo identification under this chapter”

The statute exhaustively enumerates six specific categories of acceptable identification forms in the statute itself, with explicit exclusions (e.g., driver privilege cards). The list is detailed and categorical rather than delegated to administrator discretion, leaving no ambiguity about what forms qualify.

The statute exhaustively enumerates in subsection (2) the acceptable forms of identification to cure a provisional registration, including driver's license, state ID, SSN, valid photo ID, tribal enrollment card, utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, and identified government documents. This enumeration is set directly in statute and leaves no discretion to administrators to add, subtract, or redefine these categories.

“An identification notice must be sent to the voter to obtain the correct driver's license number, state identification card number, last four digits of the social security number, or one of the following forms of alternate identification: (a) Valid photo identification; (b) A valid enrollment card of a federally recognized Indian tribe in Washington state; (c) A copy of a current utility bill; (d) A current bank statement; (e) A copy of a current government check; (f) A copy of a current paycheck; or (g) A government document, other than a voter registration card, that shows both the name and address of the voter.”

ΠΔ 26/2012 Άρθρο 130 governs election-material procurement; § 82 (read above for ID.1) carries the canonical enumeration of acceptable IDs.

KRS 117.228 and KRS 117.076 require a voter to provide 'proof of identification as defined in KRS 117.001.' KRS 117.001(18) exhaustively enumerates the acceptable forms of proof of identification (a US- or Kentucky-issued photo document, a US Department of Defense / uniformed-services photo document, a college/university photo document, or a city/county-government photo document). The acceptable IDs are fixed by statute, though the enumerating definitions section was not surfaced for this datapoint.

§ 20 requires a valid personal identification document, defined by cross-reference to Latvia's identity-documents law (passport or eID card) rather than enumerated exhaustively in the election act itself.

“A voter shall present a personal identification document valid in the Republic of Latvia”

§ 201.071 codifies voter-registration application content including 'current and valid Minnesota driver's license number or Minnesota state identification number, or… the last four digits of the voter's Social Security number.' § 203B.04 codifies absentee-application identification. § 201.061 codifies Election Day registration ID. Minnesota verifies identity by registration record + roster signature rather than photo ID at the polls; ID for registration is enumerated.

The statute requires identity verification via 'a document as meant in Article 1 of the Identification Act' (Wet op de identificatieplicht), which delegates the enumeration of acceptable documents to an external statute rather than enumerating them exhaustively within this section itself. While enumeration exists somewhere in statute, the procedural clarity is weakened by this cross-reference and indirection. Subsection 2 does provide an alternative pathway (police report + photo ID), but the primary route relies on incorporation by reference, not direct enumeration.

“de voorzitter van het stembureau de identiteit van de kiezer heeft vastgesteld aan de hand van een document als bedoeld in artikel 1 van de Wet op de identificatieplicht”

§ 8-303 enumerates acceptable verification (current and valid photo ID, current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document showing name and address). NY does NOT require photo ID at the polls in general — signature match in poll book is the primary mechanism (§ 8-302); § 8-303 ID applies to HAVA-eligible first-time voters who registered by mail without verified ID.

The statute enumerates specific student ID categories that the State Board *may* approve (UNC institutions, community colleges, eligible private institutions), but it delegates the actual approval decision to the State Board's discretion. The statute specifies what types of cards qualify for consideration but does not enumerate a closed list of acceptable ID forms for voting—it creates a process by which the Board approves cards on a biennial basis if criteria are met. This leaves discretion over which specific cards are acceptable in any given election cycle to administrative approval rather than statutory enumeration.

§ 6-11 codifies the ID requirement but the enumerated list of acceptable IDs is specified in regulation (forskrift, per § 6-14) rather than directly in the statute. Norwegian regulation accepts passport, national ID card, driving license, bank card with photo, etc. Statute provides grounding; regulation enumerates.

52 USC § 21083(b) codifies ID requirements for first-time mail-in registrants but the surfaced text focuses on the statewide registration list; specific ID enumeration not visible in the surfaced window.

The statute enumerates a primary ID requirement (driver license or state ID) in Subsection (6)(a), which satisfies enumeration at the statutory level. However, Subsection (6)(b) permits a fallback to 'other valid voter identification' without defining what forms qualify as 'valid voter identification,' leaving that determination to implicit administrative discretion or reference to external regulations. This creates a gap in exhaustive enumeration.

The statute enumerates three specific ID forms (driver's licence, passport, and enrolled-person attestation) with clear statutory grounding. However, subsection (d) explicitly delegates to regulations the authority to prescribe additional acceptable evidence of identity, which leaves enumeration incomplete and partially subject to administrator discretion rather than exhaustive statutory specification.

Article 61 nomination procedure. Article 66 candidate-nomination documents. Article 114 referendum initiative. Article 42 district-commission powers. Article 33 CEC powers. Voter-ID requirements live in Article 52 (Conducting voting) — not directly surfaced for this datapoint.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 83 and its subsections address ballot design, printing, and format specifications for electoral materials—specifically the physical characteristics of ballots, candidate identification on ballots, and the ballot model approval process. This section contains no language addressing voter identification requirements, acceptable ID forms, or any procedure for verifying voter identity. The criterion concerns enumeration of acceptable identification documents for voters; this section is entirely inapplicable to that topic.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: While the statute names two specific ID forms (身份证 and 选民证), it explicitly delegates to the election committee (选举委员会) the authority to set the rules (规定) governing how these IDs are used and verified. This grants administrative discretion over implementation, cure procedures, and appeal paths rather than exhaustively enumerating the procedure in statute. A dual-scholar test would recognize that the procedural clarity criterion is not satisfied because the selection committee retains discretionary power over the actual mechanics of ID verification and voter eligibility determination.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The statute delegates enumeration of acceptable ID forms to 'posebnim zakonima' (special laws), rather than exhaustively enumerating them in this section. The section establishes the obligation to verify identity by identification document but leaves the specification of which documents are acceptable to other legislation, creating administrative rather than statutory clarity on this point.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section governs electronic petitions supporting presidential candidacy and addresses candidate consent procedures. It does not address voter identification or acceptable ID forms at all. The section discusses electronic identification systems and document types (national ID or passport) only in the context of verifying candidate identity for petition consent, not voter eligibility or acceptable voter ID. This is not within the scope of the identification criterion being evaluated.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 75 covers DEC summarisation. The ID requirement + enumeration lives in Election Code Article 64 (inking) + Article 65 (voter identification at polling place) — not FTS-surfaced here.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 45 BWO addresses ballot design, materials, and formatting for mail-in voting envelopes. It contains no provisions whatsoever regarding voter identification, acceptable ID forms, or enumeration of ID documents. This section is entirely procedural-technical and does not engage the substantive criterion of ID requirements.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section § 48 concerns the mechanics of vote counting and how votes are credited to parties versus individual candidates based on ballot markings. It does not address voter identification procedures, acceptable ID forms, or any related documentation requirements. This section is entirely outside the scope of the ID.2 criterion, which evaluates enumeration of acceptable identification methods.

The statute enumerates a primary ID requirement (Hawaii driver's license or ID card) and fallback options (last four SSN digits or clerk-assigned number), which provides some enumeration. However, the fallback provision in subsection (b) permitting the clerk to demand 'substantiating evidence' introduces administrative discretion over which alternative documents satisfy the requirement, undermining exhaustive enumeration. The acceptable ID forms are not fully enumerated in statute; the clerk has discretion to determine what counts as acceptable 'substantiating evidence.'

“The applicant's Hawaii driver's license number or Hawaii state identification card number; provided that: (A) If no driver's license or identification card has been issued to the applicant, the last four digits of the applicant's social security number; and (B) If no social security number has been issued to the applicant, an election official or county clerk shall assign the applicant a unique identification number”

The statute enumerates three specific acceptable ID forms (passport, driving licence, identity card) but then includes a broad escape clause ('or by other means deemed satisfactory by the electoral commission') that delegates exhaustive enumeration to administrator discretion. This fails the enumeration requirement: an exhaustive list cannot include an open-ended administrator exception.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 56 addresses signature collection procedures for presidential candidates, not voter identification requirements. While § 56.4(2) mentions 'the number and series of the identification document' as required information on signature sheets, this is not a specification of acceptable ID forms for voting or candidacy—it is merely a data-collection requirement. The statute does not enumerate what forms of identification are acceptable for voters or candidates, leaving any such specification to administrative bodies or regulation. The criterion concerns enumerated acceptable IDs; this section does not address that topic.

Section 152 enumerates acceptable ID forms for voter registration (Maine driver's license, nondriver ID, or last 4 SSN digits) in subsection 1.M. However, this section addresses voter *registration* procedure, not voting ID requirements at the ballot box. The criterion ID.2 concerns 'acceptable IDs' in the voting context (e.g., what ID one must present to cast a ballot). While the enumeration is clear for registration, the statute does not establish what ID forms are required or acceptable at the point of voting itself, leaving that question to other parts of the code or administrative rule. This section satisfies enumeration narrowly for registration intake but does not establish the voting-day ID requirement framework.

“A place for the applicant's current, valid Maine driver's license number or nondriver identification card number, if applicable; or, if the applicant has no Maine driver's license number or nondriver identification card, the last 4 digits of the applicant's social security number, if applicable; or, if the application is submitted in writing and the applicant has neither number, a place to put "none" or "not applicable"”

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 48 addresses publication requirements and party observation during voting document issuance, but does not enumerate acceptable forms of identification. The section references 'a legally valid identification document number' without defining which identification documents are acceptable, leaving the specification of valid ID forms to implicit administrative discretion or prior statutory sections not provided in this excerpt.

The statute enumerates one required document (birth certificate/acta de nacimiento) but then explicitly delegates to an administrative body ('además de los documentos que determine') to determine additional acceptable documents. This hybrid approach does not satisfy the criterion because key acceptable ID forms are left to administrative discretion rather than exhaustively enumerated in statute. The dual-scholar test would identify this delegation as a procedural gap.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section regulates campaign finance reporting requirements for candidates and political committees, addressing contribution and expenditure disclosure, filing deadlines, and notification procedures. It contains no provisions regarding voter identification, acceptable ID forms, or any enumeration of identification documents. The criterion ID.2 concerns voting procedure (enumerated acceptable voter IDs); this statute addresses campaign finance disclosure procedure only.

The statute enumerates acceptable ID forms for mail-in voter registration (driver's license, SSN, photo ID, utility bills, government documents), but critically delegates to the Attorney General discretionary authority to determine additional acceptable documents via the catch-all clause '(4) any other identifying document that the Attorney General has determined to be acceptable.' This administrative discretion undermines exhaustive statutory enumeration and fails the procedural-clarity criterion under the dual-scholar test.

“Whenever an individual registers by mail after January 1, 2003 to vote for the first time in his or her current county of residence, that individual shall provide either the individual's New Jersey driver's license number or the last four digits of the individual's Social Security Number, or shall submit with the voter registration form a copy of: (1) a current and valid photo identification card; (2) a current utility bill, bank statement, government check or pay check; (3) any other government document that shows the individual's name and current address; or (4) any other identifying document that the Attorney General has determined to be acceptable for this purpose.”

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 1231 codifies registration deadline; not ID enumeration.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 38 covers candidate registration documents — not voter ID enumeration. Voter ID requirements live in Article 64 (in v0 cands).

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 19 — candidate-list filing.

The statute sets a baseline requirement (identity document), but crucially delegates the detailed enumeration of acceptable ID forms to the Minister of Home Affairs by Gazette notice, which is administrative discretion rather than statutory enumeration. While section 6(1) references 'an identity document' as the core requirement, section 6(2) permits the Minister to define the form and parameters of temporary certificates through administrative notice, leaving the exhaustive enumeration outside the statute itself.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The statute requires photo ID but explicitly delegates enumeration of acceptable forms to subsection (c), which is not included in the provided text. This creates an open-ended reference rather than a statutory enumeration in this section, leaving the acceptable ID forms to be determined elsewhere—potentially by regulation or administrative discretion rather than by exhaustive legislative listing.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Law 298 Article 87 only requires 'official documents bearing the TC ID number' but expressly delegates to YSK the determination of which official documents are accepted ('Hangi resmi belgelerin kimlik belirlenmesinde kabul edileceği, Yüksek Seçim Kurulunca seçimlerin başlangıcında tespit ve ilan edilir'). Not exhaustively enumerated in statute — administrator discretion preserved.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 2563 admits a voter who announces their name and is found on the checklist. Vermont does not require voter ID for established voters and therefore does not enumerate acceptable ID forms (first-time registrants are subject only to the federal HAVA identification baseline).

The statute requires 'valid identification' but does not exhaustively enumerate which forms of ID are acceptable; instead, it leaves the definition of 'valid identification' to administrative discretion or interpretation. While subsection (d)(2) mentions 'current driver's license or state-issued identification card' as one acceptable form (with specific requirements), the broader requirement in subsection (b) uses the undefined term 'valid identification,' failing the enumeration standard. A clear statutory enumeration of all acceptable ID types is absent.

“The applicant shall present valid identification and proof of age.”

§ 5.02 has voting-equipment definitions. The exhaustive list of acceptable IDs is in § 5.02(6m) + § 6.79 (Ch. 6, not ingested). Partial: definitional grounding visible, full enumeration not surfaced.

The section delegates the enumeration of acceptable IDs to another statute (W.S. 22-1-102(a)(xxxix)(A)) rather than enumerating them exhaustively within this section itself. While the reference suggests statutory grounding elsewhere, the criterion requires enumeration *in the section being evaluated*. The text does not provide the actual list of acceptable forms, only a cross-reference, which fails to meet the direct enumeration standard.

“acceptable identification, as set forth in W.S. 22-1-102(a)(xxxix)(A)”