Disclosure of contributor identity

Alaska Stat. § 15.13.040 explicitly requires disclosure of contributor name and address for all contributions, and principal occupation and employer for contributions exceeding $50 in the aggregate during a calendar year. The statute also contains parallel requirements for groups ($100 threshold), independent expenditures, and nongroup entities (at $250 and $2,000 thresholds with escalating detail requirements). These requirements are statutorily codified and exhaustively enumerated without delegation to administrative discretion on what identity fields must be disclosed.

“the name, address, date, and amount contributed by each contributor; and for contributions in excess of $50 in the aggregate during a calendar year, the principal occupation and employer of the contributor”

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of contributor name (implied through 'identification'), occupation, and employer for in-state individual contributions exceeding $100. For out-of-state individuals, occupation and employer are also required. The statute comprehensively enumerates identity fields (name, occupation, employer) for the primary threshold category, satisfying the full-identity requirement under the scoring rule.

“Contributions from in-state individuals whose contributions exceed $100 for that election cycle, including identification of the contributor's occupation and employer.”

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of name, address, principal place of business, employer, and occupation for contributions exceeding $200 in aggregate. This satisfies the full identity disclosure requirement (employer and occupation) mandated by DISC.3, and the requirement is clearly codified in statute with specific threshold and filing deadlines.

Section 1-45-107.5(4)(b)(II) explicitly requires disclosure of donor name and address (from (I)), plus occupation and employer for natural persons donating over $250 per calendar year. This satisfies the full-identity requirement under DISC.3 for contributors above the statutory threshold, with clear statutory enumeration of all required identity fields.

§ 106.0702 + § 106.0703 (5069) codify exhaustive contributor-identity disclosure: name, address, occupation, employer of contributors above threshold; required reporting by candidates, committees, electioneering communications organizations.

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of all four identity elements (name, address, occupation, and employer) for contributors whose aggregate contributions exceed $100 in an election period. This is a statutorily codified, enumerated requirement with no delegation to administrative discretion. The provision applies to noncandidate committees and satisfies the full identity disclosure standard.

“the name, address, occupation, and employer of each contributor making a contribution aggregating more than $100 during an election period, which was not previously reported pursuant to this section”

Iowa Code § 68A.401A(2)(b) explicitly requires disclosure of contributor name, address, occupation, and employer for all contributors whose aggregate contributions equal or exceed $200 in the calendar year. This provision is statutorily grounded and enumerates the exact identity fields required, satisfying the full procedural requirements for contributor-identity disclosure at the highest level.

KRS 121.120(4)(f) requires the Registry to compile, for each contribution in excess of $100 made to any candidate or campaign committee, 'the date, name, address, occupation, and employer of each contributor' (or, if self-employed, the business name). KRS 121.190 codifies identification of contributors and advertisers on political advertising. Contributor name, address, occupation, and employer disclosure is codified.

Section 1060(6) explicitly requires disclosure of contributor identity for contributions exceeding $50, including name, occupation, places of business (which serves as employer identification), and mailing address. The statute enumerates these specific fields exhaustively and sets a clear threshold ($50), satisfying the procedural clarity requirement for full contributor-identity disclosure.

“An itemization of each contribution of more than $50 made to or received by the committee for the purpose of initiating or influencing a campaign, including the name, occupation, places of business and mailing address of each contributor and the amount and date of the contribution”

Maryland Md. Election Law § 13-221(a)(2) requires collection of contributor name and address as mandatory fields in account books. Section § 13-221(a)(3) further requires treasurers to record occupation and employer of contributors who give $500+ cumulatively during an election cycle, with the State Board providing notice and enforcement mechanisms for compliance. This satisfies the full identity disclosure requirement (name, address, occupation, employer) for significant contributions.

“the name and address of the person from whom the asset was received or to whom the expenditure was made”

The statute explicitly requires that authorization cards for electronic contributions above $200 must include name, residential address, occupation, and employer. This satisfies the full identity disclosure requirement at the statutory level for contributions meeting the threshold, with no reliance on administrative discretion.

“Said authorization card shall include (1) the name and residential address of the contributor, (2) the occupation and employer or employers of any contributor whose authorization card authorizes a contribution of two hundred dollars or more or periodic contributions which in the aggregate exceed or may exceed two hundred dollars or more within any one calendar year”

Statute explicitly enumerates full name, street address, occupation, employer, and principal place of business as required contributor identity fields for late contributions above defined thresholds.

“shall report a late contribution by filing with the filing officer within 48 hours after its receipt the full name, street address, occupation, employer, and principal place of business of the contributor.”

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of name, address, employer (or occupation if self-employed), date, and amount for contributions exceeding $25. All four identity elements mandated by DISC.3 are enumerated in statutory text with no delegation to administrative discretion. The $25 threshold is clearly defined.

“A separate listing by name, address, employer or occupation if self-employed, of each person from whom the committee received one or more contributions, in money or other things of value, which in the aggregate total in excess of $25, together with the date and amount of each such contribution.”

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of multiple contributor-identity elements: full name and surname, residence, place of work, position held (occupation/type of activity), and for legal persons, state identification number and name. This satisfies the full-identity requirement (employer/occupation/employer identification). The requirement is statutorily enumerated in Art. 58(1) with no delegation to administrative discretion for the identity fields themselves.

§ 13-37-229 requires each campaign-finance report to itemize every contributor of $50 or more by full name, mailing address, occupation and employer — full contributor identification including occupation and employer. Level 2.

“the full name, mailing address, occupation, and employer, if any, of each person who has made aggregate contributions”

Nebraska § 49-1458(2) explicitly requires statutory disclosure of full contributor identity for late contributions (defined as $1,000+). The statute mandates name, street address, occupation, employer, and principal place of business—all elements of DISC.3's 'full identity' standard. The disclosure requirement is enumerated exhaustively in statute, with no delegation to administrative discretion.

“The report shall include the full name, street address or post office box number, occupation, employer, and principal place of business of the contributor, the amount of the contribution, and the date of receipt”

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of full name and postal address for all contributors above $50, and additionally requires occupation and employer information for contributions exceeding $200 in the aggregate per election cycle. This satisfies all four identity elements (name, address, occupation, employer) for higher-threshold contributions, meeting the full-identity standard of score 2.

The statute explicitly requires all four elements of full contributor identity for currency contributions: name, mailing address, occupation, and employer name and address. The requirement is statutorily grounded and exhaustively enumerated without reliance on administrative discretion.

“Such report shall include the name and mailing address of each contributor, the occupation of the contributor and the amount of the currency contribution, and the name and mailing address of the contributor's employer.”

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of contributor name, address (subsection A(1)), and occupation and type and name of business for contributions of $250 or more (subsection A(2)), meeting the full identity requirement. The procedural elements are codified in the statute with enumerated fields and a defined monetary threshold.

§ 14-102 codifies the contents of campaign-finance statements — filer must disclose name, address, occupation, employer (if any), date, and amount for each itemized contribution. § 14-104 (not in FTS top-5 here) codifies parallel for receipts/expenditures.

The statute exhaustively enumerates all required identity disclosures: name, complete mailing address, principal occupation (defined to include job title/profession and employer name/field of business), and date received. These requirements are statutory and mandatory for contributions above the $50 threshold. The State Board is tasked with preparing the business-activity classification schedule, but the disclosure obligation itself is codified in statute.

“The statement shall list the name and complete mailing address of each contributor, the amount contributed, the principal occupation of the contributor, and the date such contribution was received.”

§ 16.1-08.1-02.3 codifies disclosure of contributor name + mailing address + total + date for each aggregated contribution >$200. § 16.1-08.1-03.14 codifies conduit-disclosure with name, address, occupation, employer, and principal place of business for contributors of $5,000+. § 16.1-08.1-03.1 codifies special requirements. Comprehensive contributor-identity disclosure codified.

ORC 3517.10 requires full contributor identity: name, current employer (or, if self-employed, occupation and name of business). Full identity tier (employer/occupation) satisfied.

“occupation and the name of the individual's business”

The section explicitly requires full disclosure of contributor identity—name, address, occupation, and employer—for all contributions exceeding $50 in the aggregate. This is statutory rule language (not delegated to administrative discretion) and exhaustively enumerates the four identity fields required by the criterion.

§ 1626(b)(1) codifies the full-identity disclosure tier for contributors >$250 in aggregate: 'full name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer, if any, or the principal place of business, if self-employed'. Full identity (name + address + occupation + employer) codified.

“occupation and name of employer, if any, or the principal place of business”

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of name, street address, city, state, zip code, occupation, and employer (or business name if self-employed) for persons making independent expenditures, electioneering communications, or covered transfers. Additionally, it mandates disclosure of the identity of all donors contributing $1,000 or more to the spender within the election cycle, satisfying the full-identity disclosure requirement (name, address, occupation, employer).

“Reports of independent expenditures, electioneering communications, or covered transfers by a person shall contain the name, street address, city, state, zip code, occupation, employer (if self-employed, the name and place of business), of the person responsible for the expenditure, the name, street address, city, state, and zip code of the person receiving the expenditure the date and amount of each expenditure, and the year to date total.”

Section 8-13-1302(A)(2) requires disclosure of contributor name and address, and § 8-13-1302(A)(6) separately requires disclosure of occupation. Together these provisions mandate full-identity disclosure (name, address, occupation) for all contributions, with no threshold exemption stated. The statute explicitly enumerates each required field and imposes a four-year retention requirement, satisfying both the enumeration and record-retention elements of procedural clarity.

“the name and address of each person making a contribution and the amount and date of receipt of each contribution”

§ 12-27-11 codifies required contributor information: 'No person, entity, candidate, or political committee may give or accept a contribution unless the name, mailing address, city and state of the contributor is made known' — and contributions from unknown sources must be remitted to the state. § 12-27-28 codifies large-contribution supplemental reporting. § 12-27-16.1 codifies IE-communication contributor disclosure. § 12-27-1 codifies definitions. Comprehensive contributor-identity disclosure codified.

Tennessee Code § 2-10-107(a)(2)(A) explicitly requires disclosure of the full name, complete address, occupation, and employer for all contributors exceeding $100. The statute also establishes a 'best efforts' standard with specific procedural guidelines (first-class mail notice or written solicitation) for obtaining this information, demonstrating clear statutory grounding of the identity-disclosure requirement.

“a list of all the contributions received, including the full name, complete address, occupation, and employer of each person who contributed a total amount of more than one hundred dollars ($100) during the period for which the statement is submitted, and the amount contributed by that person”

§ 254.0312 codifies disclosure of contributor identity: every written solicitation must request 'the individual's full name and address, the individual's principal occupation or job title, and the full name of the individual's employer,' and a filer must use best efforts to obtain, maintain, and report that information for any individual whose contributions equal or exceed $500 in a reporting period. Contributor name, address, occupation, and employer disclosure codified.

“the individual's full name and address, the individual's principal occupation or job title, and the full name of the individual's employer”

52 USC § 30104(b)(3) codifies full-identity disclosure ('name, address, occupation, and employer' or principal place of business) for contributors over $200. Full identity tier.

“the identification of each person who made a contribution in excess of $200”

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of name, mailing address, occupation, and employer/principal business for contributors exceeding the $100 threshold. This satisfies the full-identity requirement enumerated in the statute. The requirements are mandatory and defined in the campaign finance report prescribed by the State Board.

“the name of the contributor, listed alphabetically, the mailing address of the contributor, the amount of the contribution, the aggregate amount of contributions from the contributor to date, the date of the last contribution, the occupation of the contributor, the name of his employer or principal business, and the locality where employed or where his business is located”

RCW 29B.50.100(2)(b)(iii)(B) statutorily requires disclosure of contributor identity for special solicitations and other funds at the $25 threshold. The statute explicitly mandates name, address, occupation (for individuals), employer, and contribution amount—meeting the full-identity standard. This procedural requirement is enumerated in the statute itself, not delegated to agency discretion.

“The name, address, and, for individuals, occupation and employer, of a person whose funds were used to pay for the campaign, along with the amount;”

The statute explicitly requires full identity disclosure for contributions exceeding $250 in a single election cycle: name, residence, mailing address, major business affiliation, and occupation (for individuals). This satisfies the statutory enumeration of all four disclosure elements (name, address, occupation, employer/affiliation) above the specified threshold.

“The name of any person making a contribution and the amount of the contribution. If the total contributions of any one person in any one election cycle amount to more than $250, the residence and mailing address of the contributor and, if the contributor is an individual, his or her major business affiliation and occupation shall also be reported.”

The statute requires disclosure of donor name and partial address information (postcode and either residence or business address) for donations above €500 per year. However, it does not explicitly mandate disclosure of occupation or employer information, which are key elements of 'full identity' under the criterion. The provision establishes a statutory disclosure threshold and identifies required fields, but falls short of the complete identity disclosure standard (score 2).

“Geldspenden (§ 2 Z 5), Spenden in Form von lebenden Subventionen (§ 2 Z 5) und Spenden in Form von Sachleistungen (§ 2 Z 5) ab einem Gesamtwert der Spende von € 500,- pro Jahr und Spender, unter Nennung des Namens und der Postleitzahl der Wohnadresse oder Geschäftsanschrift des Spenders”

The statute requires name and address for all contributors exceeding the threshold ($100-$200), and occupation for contributors reaching $1,000. However, employer disclosure is not required at any threshold, and occupation disclosure is limited to the higher $1,000 threshold rather than the general threshold amount. This provides partial but incomplete identity disclosure compared to the full identity criterion.

The section requires disclosure of large contributions (≥$20,000) and cross-references Section 17-5-8 for the required disclosure fields. However, this section alone does not enumerate what 'the same information' includes; the statute requires reviewing the cross-referenced section to determine whether name, address, occupation, and employer are mandated. The procedural clarity is therefore incomplete within this section's four corners, though the statutory framework exists.

“the principal campaign committee or political action committee shall file a report disclosing the receipt of any single contribution of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) or more. These reports shall disclose the same information required by Section 17-5-8”

Article 44 bis requires that contributor identity be reported in final campaign disclosure ('identificación de las personas'), and mandates that donations be made through traceable methods (bank transfer, check, cash, internet, or other means permitting donor identification). However, the statute does not enumerate specific identity elements: it does not explicitly require name, address, occupation, and employer. The statute requires identification without specifying which identity fields constitute adequate disclosure, leaving the scope of required disclosure details to administrative interpretation.

Section 306 requires disclosure of contributor name and address for gifts above the threshold, satisfying the name-and-address component. However, the statute does not require disclosure of the contributor's occupation or employer, which are necessary for 'full identity' under the criterion. The procedure is statutorily grounded and enumerated but incomplete relative to the criterion's requirements.

“the name and address of the person or entity who made the gift”

The statute requires disclosure of contributor names (nomes dos doadores) and donation amounts in final accounting reports, but does not mandate disclosure of address, occupation, or employer information. This satisfies the name-only threshold (score 1) rather than full identity disclosure (score 2).

The section requires disclosure of contributor name (and address for aggregated contributions exceeding $200), but only when the identity is known and ascertainable. The statute does not mandate collection or disclosure of occupation or employer information. The provision addresses what happens when identity is unknown (forfeiture to the Receiver General) but does not establish a comprehensive disclosure requirement for name, address, occupation, and employer as the criterion requires.

“If the name of the contributor of a contribution of more than $20 to a leadership contestant, or the name or address of a contributor who has made contributions of a total amount of more than $200 to a leadership contestant, is not known”

The statute mandates filed statements 'in accordance with the provisions of section 9-603,' which cross-references the disclosure requirements. However, the quoted section itself does not enumerate what contributor-identity fields (name, address, occupation, employer) must be disclosed—that detail is delegated to § 9-603. While the framework for disclosure is clearly statutorily grounded and sworn statements are required, the specific identity elements are not exhaustively enumerated within this section. A complete assessment requires reviewing § 9-603, but this section alone does not provide the full procedural clarity needed for a 'yes' score.

“Each treasurer of a committee, other than a state central committee, shall file a statement, sworn under penalty of false statement with the proper authority in accordance with the provisions of section 9-603”

The statute requires disclosure of donor name (osobno ime odnosno naziv) and address (adresa) for contributions to campaign financing. However, the section does not mandate disclosure of occupation or employer information, which are components of 'full identity' under the criterion. The procedural requirement is statutorily grounded and enumerated, but incomplete relative to the full-identity standard.

“specificirane podatke o donatoru (osobno ime odnosno naziv i adresa), datumu uplate donacije”

Section 18(4) mandates that every donor must be identified by data specified in § 19h(1)(h), which provides a statutory reference to detailed identity requirements. However, the section itself does not enumerate those requirements—it merely cross-references another provision. The text quoted requires identification but does not specify whether name, address, occupation, and employer are all included in the referenced provision. This creates statutory grounding for identification but lacks exhaustive enumeration within the section itself, warranting a 'partial' score of 1 (name only is identifiable from context, but full identity elements are not confirmed in this excerpt).

“Každý dárce musí být identifikován údaji podle § 19h odst. 1 písm. h).”

The statute explicitly requires name and address disclosure for all contributions, satisfying the foundational identity requirement. However, it does not mandate disclosure of occupation or employer information, which are components of 'full identity' under the criterion's scoring rubric.

§ 12¹(7) requires each donation to be reported with the donor's name and personal identification code — a unique national identifier — plus the value and date. Every donor is fully identified by name and national ID; employer/occupation fields are not used because legal-person donations are prohibited entirely.

“With regard to a donation a political party will indicate that it is a donation and indicate the name and personal identification code of the donator and the value and the date of accrual of the donation.”

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of contributor identity (nom), nationality, and tax-domicile address in campaign account annexes. However, it does not mandate disclosure of occupation or employer, which are components of 'full identity' under the criterion's definition. The procedural framework (recording, receipt issuance, CNCCFP validation) is statutorily grounded, but the identity fields are incomplete.

“l'identité, la nationalité et l'adresse du domicile fiscal du donateur”

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of contributor name and address (or comparable identifying information) for donations exceeding €10,000 in a calendar year, satisfying the basic identity requirement. However, the statute does not mandate disclosure of occupation or employer information—only what is necessary for comparable identification of the person. This covers name and address but falls short of the full-identity standard (employer/occupation), placing it at score 1 rather than 2.

“Spenden, Mitgliedsbeiträge und Mandatsträgerbeiträge an eine Partei oder einen oder mehrere ihrer Gebietsverbände, deren Gesamtwert in einem Kalenderjahr (Rechnungsjahr) 10 000 Euro übersteigt, sind unter Angabe des Namens und der Anschrift des Zuwenders oder anderer Angaben, die eine Identifikation der Person vergleichbar ermöglichen, sowie der Gesamthöhe der Zuwendung im Rechenschaftsbericht zu verzeichnen.”

Ν. 3023/2002 Άρθρο 17 requires numbered receipts and coupons for all party/candidate income — contributor identity must be recorded.

“Αποδείξεις είσπραξης και κουπόνια”

The statute requires disclosure of contributor names (for both entities and individuals above a 300,000 kr. threshold) and contribution amounts, satisfying the name component. However, the statute does not explicitly require disclosure of address, occupation, or employer information—only names. This provides partial identity disclosure but falls short of the full identity standard (employer/occupation).

“Auk þess skal ríkisendurskoðandi birta nöfn allra lögaðila sem veita framlög til stjórnmálastarfsemi sem og fjárhæð þeirra. Einnig skal birta nöfn einstaklinga sem veitt hafa framlög sem eru metin á meira en 300.000 kr.”

Idaho Code § 67-6610(a) statutorily requires disclosure of contributor name and complete address for contributions exceeding $50, satisfying the 'name only' tier (score 1). However, the statute does not require occupation or employer information, falling short of the 'full identity' requirement (score 2) that the criterion seeks. The procedural element of statutory enumeration is present for name and address but absent for the additional identity fields.

“Any person who contributes more than fifty dollars ($50.00) (including one or more smaller contributions which aggregate more than fifty dollars ($50.00) in any one calendar year) to a candidate or political committee shall accompany the contribution with a statement of his full name and complete address.”

10 ILCS 5/9-11(a)(4) requires reports to include full name + mailing address of every contributor >$150 aggregate, plus occupation and employer above $500.

“the full name and mailing address of each person who has made one or more contributions to or for the committee within the reporting period in an aggregate amount or value in excess of $150”

K.S.A. 25-4154(b) mandates disclosure of contributor name and address for contributions over $50, satisfying the name component of the criterion. However, the section does not require disclosure of occupation or employer, which are the additional identity elements specified in DISC.3. The statute establishes the basic procedural requirement but omits two key fields.

“No person shall give or accept any contribution in excess of $50 unless the name and address of the contributor is made known to the individual receiving the contribution.”

§ 7 requires each donation to be recorded with the donor's given name, surname, personal identification number and place of residence — a donation lacking these is 'anonymous' and prohibited. Donors are fully identified by name and national ID; employer/occupation fields are not used.

“the given name, surname, personal identification number and place of residence for the giver (donor)”

The statute requires disclosure of contributor full name and address for contributions above the reporting threshold, satisfying the basic identity requirement. However, the section does not mandate disclosure of occupation or employer information, which are explicitly required under DISC.3 for a full score. Only name and address are statutorily enumerated.

The statute requires disclosure of the campaign treasurer's name and designation date when soliciting donations, which provides minimal procedural grounding for contributor accountability. However, the text does not enumerate requirements for disclosure of the contributor's own identity (name, address, occupation, or employer), only the recipient and treasurer information. The section authorizes donation solicitation and specifies what must be stated in public appeals, but lacks the full identity-disclosure elements DISC.3 requires.

The statute requires disclosure of donor name and address (or company registration details for corporate donors), satisfying the name and address component. However, it does not explicitly require disclosure of the contributor's occupation or employer, which are elements of 'full identity' under the scoring rubric. The procedural requirement is partially codified in statute but incomplete.

Article 55 establishes a statutory prohibition on anonymous contributions (requiring persons to be 'identified'), which satisfies the foundational principle of contributor identity disclosure. However, the statute does not enumerate which specific identity elements must be disclosed (name, address, occupation, employer) or above what contribution threshold disclosure applies. The section provides the rule but lacks the procedural detail—field-by-field requirements and monetary thresholds—that DISC.3 requires for a full score.

“Los partidos políticos no podrán recibir aportaciones de personas no identificadas.”

The statute requires disclosure of contributor identity (name) and date/amount for contributions exceeding $200. However, it does not explicitly require address, occupation, or employer information—only 'identification' of the person, which typically means name but is not enumerated exhaustively. The procedural requirement is statutorily grounded for name disclosure but lacks the full complement of identity fields (employer/occupation) specified in the criterion.

The statute explicitly requires disclosure of contributor name and address for contributions exceeding $100, satisfying the basic identity requirement. However, it does not mandate disclosure of occupation or employer information, which are the full identity markers specified in the criterion. The procedural framework is statutorily grounded and enumerated, but incomplete on the scope of identity disclosure.

Section 260.059(3) requires disclosure of contributor name and original source of funds for contributors giving $5,000+ to independent-expenditure entities, satisfying the 'name' component. However, the statute does not explicitly require disclosure of address, occupation, or employer—only name and fund source. The original-source definition in subsection (6)(c)(B) identifies the person and fund type (business income vs. personal funds) but does not mandate occupational or employer fields as distinct disclosure elements.

Article 140 § 1(2) requires disclosure of contributor name (imię, nazwisko) and place of residence (miejscowość zamieszkania) for contributions exceeding the minimum wage threshold, satisfying the name-and-address requirement. However, the statute does not mandate disclosure of occupation or employer information, which are elements of 'full identity' under the criterion. The procedural requirement is statutorily grounded and enumerated, but incompletely covers the identity fields specified in DISC.3.

“ze wskazaniem imienia, nazwiska oraz miejscowości zamieszkania takiej osoby”

Article 16.4 requires that contributions be made by check or other banking means that identify the amount and origin, which establishes statutory requirement for some contributor identification. However, the statute does not explicitly enumerate which specific identity fields (name, address, occupation, employer) must be disclosed. The requirement is limited to identification of 'origin' via banking channels, not a comprehensive identity disclosure requirement specifying name, address, occupation, and employer details.

“são obrigatoriamente tituladas por cheque ou por outro meio bancário que permita a identificação do montante e da sua origem”

Law 2820 Article 61 enumerates income sources; Article 69 (mentioned at v0 2.4 evidence) requires party-HQ-printed RECEIPTS for all donations, with donor identification. Article 66 prohibits anonymous large donations. Together they require contributor identification but DON'T mandate the full 'name + address + occupation + employer' enumeration of US-style disclosure. Partial.

The section mandates disclosure of donor full names for Irish citizens and other entity types (companies, unions, societies, etc.), satisfying the name requirement. However, the statute does not require disclosure of occupation or employer information for any donor category—only name, address (for entities), and documentary verification. This covers the name component but omits the occupation/employer elements specified in DISC.3.

“In the case of a donation by an Irish citizen the report must also— a give the donor's full name”

Section 20A-11-801 establishes registration and officer-disclosure requirements for political issues committees but does not itself specify what contributor-identity fields must be disclosed in contribution reports. The section mandates that committees report 'each contribution received' but the text is truncated before detailing the required disclosure fields. Subsection (3) requires detailed officer information (names, addresses, occupations) but does not enumerate contributor-identity requirements. To fully satisfy DISC.3, the statute would need to explicitly require name, address, occupation, and employer for contributions above a threshold—which is not evident in this section.

“Each political issues committee shall report to the lieutenant governor each contribution received by the political i”

§ 2963 requires the campaign-finance report to disclose, for each contribution over $100, the contributor's 'full name, town of residence, and mailing address,' the date, and the amount; § 2967 requires the same for large late contributions. Vermont thus mandates contributor name and address but does not require the contributor's occupation or employer (two of the four elements).

The statute requires disclosure of 'contributions' with 'full and complete record,' and mandates disclosure of funding sources for nonindividual contributors over $1,000. However, the statute does not explicitly enumerate which specific identity elements (name, address, occupation, employer) must be disclosed; the Secretary of State's prescribed form controls the content, leaving key procedural detail to administrative discretion rather than statute. This satisfies the name-disclosure requirement but falls short of the full-identity specification.

“File with the secretary of state a statement of contributions and expenditures setting forth the full and complete record of contributions including cash, goods or services and actual and promised expenditures, on a form prescribed by the secretary of state”

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 116 of Belgium's Code électoral governs candidate nomination procedures, including signature requirements, candidate information fields, and party-list designation. It does not address campaign finance, contributor disclosure, or financial contributions. The section contains no provisions requiring disclosure of contributor names, addresses, occupations, or employers.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 44 addresses polling procedures, ballot security, and voter identification during the voting process. It contains no provisions regarding campaign contributions, contributor disclosure, or financial reporting requirements. The criterion DISC.3 concerns the statutory requirement to disclose contributor identity (name, address, occupation, employer) for contributions above a threshold. This section is entirely outside the scope of campaign-finance disclosure rules.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 34 of the Wfpp requires political associations to adopt a gift regulation (giftenreglement) governing contributions and their disclosure, but the statute does not enumerate what specific contributor identity elements (name, address, occupation, employer) must be disclosed, nor does it establish thresholds. The procedural requirement is delegated to the organization's own gift regulation rather than being defined in statute itself.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 44 (MP Election Law) lists candidate-filing documentation (proof of electoral right, candidacy acceptance, residency, citizenship, voter-signature support) — not contributor-identity disclosure.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 86 of LOREG addresses voting procedures at the polling place (ballot secrecy, voter identification, ballot deposit, and observer documentation of voter order). It contains no provisions regarding campaign-finance disclosure, contributor identity, contribution thresholds, or any related reporting requirements. The section is entirely procedural for election administration, not campaign finance.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.