Foreign-source prohibition

The statute explicitly prohibits foreign nationals and foreign-influenced corporations from making contributions or expenditures in connection with elections. The prohibition is statutory and unambiguous, covering both direct and indirect contributions and express or implied promises. This satisfies the requirement for a clear, codified prohibition on foreign-source campaign contributions.

“A foreign-influenced corporation or foreign national may not, directly or indirectly, in connection with an election under this chapter, make a contribution or expenditure or make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or expenditure.”

Article 15(e)–(f) explicitly prohibit by statute direct contributions from foreign governments, entities, and foreign natural/legal persons without domestic residency or domicile. The prohibition is enumerated exhaustively in the law and creates a clear, codified rule. No reliance on regulation or administrative discretion is evident.

Article 23 of the Electoral Code prohibits foreign-state-funded campaign activities — 'It shall be prohibited to conduct an election campaign, disseminate any type of campaign material, use premises, means of transport and communication, material values acquired through funds received from foreign states, foreign citizens.' Reinforced by Articles 27-29 (oversight + audit).

Section 302D(1) explicitly prohibits gifts (donations) from foreign donors to members of Parliament, political entities, and their agents when the amount equals or exceeds $1,000. The prohibition is statutorily grounded and includes a defined penalty (200 penalty units for criminal offence, or civil penalty up to 3 times the gift value). The section also specifies exceptions requiring verification and affirmation, and defines the operative term 'foreign donor' through cross-reference to other CEA provisions.

“A person contravenes this subsection if: (a) the person is: (ia) a member of the House of Representatives (the gift recipient ) or a Senator (the gift recipient ); or (i) an agent of a political entity (the gift recipient ); or (ii) a financial controller of a significant third party or an associated entity (the gift recipient ); and (b) a gift is made to, or for the benefit of, the gift recipient during a financial year; and (c) the gift is made by, or on behalf of, a person (the donor ); and (d) the donor is a foreign donor; and (e) at the time the gift is made, the amount or value of the gift is at least $1,000”

§ 6 Abs. 6 Z 6 explicitly prohibits parties and candidates from accepting donations from foreign natural or legal persons and legally entities with foreign economic ownership, establishing a clear statutory ban on foreign-source contributions. The provision includes a narrow exception for EU citizens with Austrian residence, demonstrating precise statutory enumeration of both the prohibition and its exceptions.

“ausländischen natürlichen oder juristischen Personen, sowie juristischen Personen mit ausländischem wirtschaftlichem Eigentümer, sofern die Spende im Einzelfall € 500,- übersteigt, ausgenommen von dieser Beschränkung sind EU-Bürger mit Wohnsitz in Österreich”

Article 48 codifies that expenses for the preparation and conduct of elections are funded from the state budget — combined with Article 45 limiting campaigning subjects to 'Citizens of the Republic of Belarus, political parties, other public associations, labor [collectives]' — effectively prohibits direct foreign-source contributions by enumeration of permitted domestic subjects. Codified within the Code.

Чл. 168 codifies a comprehensive direct foreign-funding ban for campaigns: prohibits funds from foreign individuals (except EU citizens with voting rights), foreign governments, foreign state enterprises, foreign commercial companies, foreign non-profit organizations; also bans free use of public administrative resources and free goods/services from prohibited sources.

“Партия, коалиция или инициативен комитет във връзка с предизборната кампания не може да получава”

Section 351.1(1) provides a clear, unambiguous statutory prohibition on foreign third parties incurring partisan activity, election advertising, and election survey expenses during an election period. Subsection (2) defines 'foreign third party' exhaustively by reference to citizenship, residency, and incorporation status, establishing a bright-line statutory rule rather than discretionary administrative criteria. The provision directly restricts foreign-source spending in Canadian elections.

“A foreign third party shall not incur the following expenses: (a) partisan activity expenses in relation to a partisan activity that is carried out during an election period; (b) election advertising expenses in relation to an election advertising message that is transmitted during that period; and (c) election survey expenses in relation to an election survey that is conducted during that period.”

The statute explicitly and directly prohibits citizens participating in elections at all levels of People's Congresses from directly or indirectly accepting any form of support or assistance related to elections provided by foreign institutions, organizations, or individuals. The prohibition is unambiguously codified in statutory text with no delegation to administrative discretion. The section further specifies enforceable consequences: exclusion from candidate lists, removal if already listed, or invalidation of election if already elected.

Section 9-622(17) explicitly prohibits foreign nationals from making contributions or expenditures, and section 9-622(18) prohibits solicitation or acceptance of such contributions. The prohibition is clearly codified in statute with specific language covering direct contributions and express or implied promises, satisfying the statutory grounding requirement for procedural clarity.

“Any foreign national that makes, directly or indirectly, (A) any contribution or any express or implied promise to make a contribution, or (B) any expenditure”

Article 22 explicitly and statutorily prohibits the financing of political parties, independent representatives, and candidates by foreign states, foreign political parties, and foreign legal entities. The prohibition is codified directly in law with no reliance on administrative discretion or regulation. The section provides clear statutory grounding for the foreign-source prohibition criterion.

“Zabranjuje se financiranje političkih stranka, nezavisnih zastupnika, članova predstavničkih tijela jedinica lokalne i područne (regionalne) samouprave izabranih s liste grupe birača, nezavisnih lista, odnosno lista grupe birača i kandidata od strane: – stranih država, stranih političkih stranaka, stranih pravnih osoba,”

Section 18(1)(o) explicitly prohibits parties and movements from accepting gifts or other gratuitous benefits from non-Czech citizens and non-EU citizens without permanent or temporary Czech residence registration. This statutory provision clearly enumerates the foreign-source prohibition as a black-letter rule, establishing that foreign contributions are prohibited by law.

“od fyzické osoby, která není státním občanem České republiky nebo státním občanem jiného členského státu Evropské unie, který je přihlášen k trvalému nebo přechodnému pobytu na území České republiky”

§ 12³ restricts donations to natural persons who are Estonian citizens or hold permanent residence / long-term-resident status, and § 12³(2) expressly prohibits donations by aliens — a direct statutory ban on foreign-source contributions.

“8) donations by aliens, except for donations by persons holding the permanent right of residence or the status of a long-term resident in Estonia.”

The section explicitly prohibits by statute any direct or indirect material contributions or aid from a foreign state or foreign legal entity to any candidate, for any election expense. This satisfies the criterion's requirement that foreign-source prohibition be codified in statute rather than left to regulation or administrative discretion.

“Aucun candidat ne peut recevoir, directement ou indirectement, pour quelque dépense que ce soit, des contributions ou aides matérielles d'un Etat étranger ou d'une personne morale de droit étranger.”

Section 25(2)(3) explicitly prohibits donations from outside the scope of the law (foreign sources) in statute, with narrowly enumerated exceptions for EU citizens, Germans, and EU-registered companies with majority German/EU ownership. The prohibition is statutorily grounded and the permitted exceptions are defined with specificity, satisfying the procedural-clarity requirement regardless of policy position on foreign funding.

“Spenden von außerhalb des Geltungsbereiches dieses Gesetzes, es sei denn, dass a) diese Spenden aus dem Vermögen eines Deutschen im Sinne des Grundgesetzes, eines Bürgers der Europäischen Union oder eines Wirtschaftsunternehmens, dessen Anteile sich zu mehr als 50 vom Hundert im Eigentum von Deutschen im Sinne des Grundgesetzes oder eines Bürgers der Europäischen Union befinden oder dessen Hauptsitz in einem Mitgliedstaat der Europäischen Union ist, unmittelbar einer Partei zufließen”

Ν. 3023/2002 Άρθρο 7 prohibits financing from (a) natural persons without Greek citizenship, (b) public/private legal persons, (c) local-government entities, (d) media owners. Comprehensive foreign-source + corporate-source ban.

“Απαγορεύονται η χρηματοδότηση και κάθε είδους παροχές προς τα κόμματα και τους υποψήφιους βουλευ- τές”

The statute explicitly prohibits (Óheimilt er) political parties and candidates from accepting contributions from foreign citizens, foreign companies, and other foreign entities registered in other countries. This prohibition is codified directly in statute with a narrow exception for foreign citizens with voting rights in Iceland. The rule is clear, enumerated, and statutory rather than delegated to administrative discretion.

“Óheimilt er að veita viðtöku framlögum frá erlendum ríkisborgurum, fyrirtækjum eða öðrum aðilum sem skráðir eru í öðrum löndum.”

The statute provides a clear statutory definition that foreign nationals are prohibited sources for contributions. The definition directly establishes the prohibition required by FOR.1, grounding the foreign-source restriction in codified law rather than regulatory interpretation or administrative discretion.

“"Prohibited source" is a foreign national.”

Iowa Code § 68A.404(2)(c) explicitly prohibits foreign nationals from making independent expenditures on candidates or ballot issues, with a detailed statutory definition of 'foreign national' that covers foreign governments, political parties, and foreign entities, while carving out U.S. citizens and permanent residents. The prohibition is direct, unambiguous, and statutorily grounded without delegation to administrative discretion.

K.S.A. 25-4180(d)(1) explicitly prohibits acceptance of foreign-national contributions in statutory language. The statute defines 'foreign national' with specificity in subsection (e), establishes enforcement through the attorney general in (d)(2), and provides civil remedies including injunctive relief and statutory damages in (d)(3), satisfying both the statutory prohibition and enforcement elements.

“No person shall accept, directly or indirectly, any contribution or expenditure from a foreign national made for any activity promoting or opposing the adoption or repeal of any provision of the constitution of the state of Kansas.”

Article 33(3) provides a clear statutory prohibition on foreign financing of elections, explicitly forbidding direct and indirect participation by international organizations, foreign states, foreign legal entities, foreign citizens, and stateless persons. This meets the criterion's requirement for a statutorily-grounded foreign-source prohibition, regardless of enforcement mechanisms or verification procedures.

“Financing of elections in the Republic on the part of international organizations and international public associations, foreign state bodies, foreign legal entities and citizens as well as stateless persons, any their direct or indirect participation in financing of elections in the Republic of Kazakhstan shall be forbidden.”

KRS 121.254 codifies a foreign-source prohibition: 'a foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly... make a donation, contribution, or expenditure in support or opposition of a ballot measure.' KRS 121.250 bars a political issues committee from knowingly receiving foreign-national funds. Direct foreign-source contribution is prohibited by statute.

§ 35 of the Referendum Law prohibits campaign funding obtained directly or indirectly from legal persons registered abroad and foreign citizens; the Law on Financing of Political Organisations limits party income to enumerated domestic sources, excluding foreign donors.

“are directly or indirectly obtained from legal persons registered abroad and foreign citizens”

The statute explicitly prohibits foreign government-influenced entities from making contributions to influence the nomination or election of candidates. The prohibition is directly codified in statute (subsection 2), the definition of 'foreign government-influenced entity' is enumerated exhaustively (subsection 1.E), and penalty mechanisms are specified (subsection 8 provides for civil penalties up to $5,000). The procedural framework meets the dual-scholar test: both left and right scholars would recognize this as a clear, statutorily-grounded prohibition regardless of their policy views on foreign-source restrictions.

“A foreign government-influenced entity may not make, directly or indirectly, a contribution, expenditure, independent expenditure, electioneering communication or any other donation or disbursement of funds to influence the nomination or election of a candidate or the initiation or approval of a referendum.”

Article 54(1)(d) explicitly prohibits foreign natural and legal persons ('personas físicas o morales extranjeras') from making contributions or donations to political parties, candidates, or aspirants to elective office. The prohibition is codified directly in statute with clear enumeration of prohibited foreign sources, satisfying the statutory grounding requirement for FOR.1. No administrative discretion is inserted; the rule is categorical and self-executing.

“Los partidos políticos, personas físicas o morales extranjeras”

Section 130.179 explicitly prohibits foreign nationals from participating in decision-making regarding contributions to influence elections and from soliciting donations or contributions by others. The statute clearly grounds the foreign-source prohibition in statutory text rather than administrative discretion, directly satisfying the criterion's requirement that a foreign-contribution ban be encoded in law.

“A foreign national may not direct, dictate, control, or directly or indirectly participate in the decision-making process of any person with regard to that person's activities to influence an election on a ballot measure, such as decisions concerning the making of contributions to influence an election on a ballot measure. 2. A foreign national may not solicit, directly or indirectly, the making of a donation, contribution, or expenditure by another person to influence an election on a ballot measure.”

Article 54(5)(g)–(h) explicitly and statutorily prohibits financing by foreign legal persons and foreign states/international organizations. The prohibition is codified in the Electoral Code itself, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion. This directly addresses the FOR.1 criterion: a clear statutory prohibition on direct foreign contribution to electoral competitors, referendum participants, and initiative groups.

“foreign legal persons, including foreign or joint ventures”

§ 13-37-502 prohibits foreign nationals from funding candidate elections and § 13-37-505 from funding statewide ballot issues, and bars any person from soliciting, accepting or using foreign-national funds for those purposes.

“It is unlawful for a foreign national, directly or through an intermediary, to make a disbursement for an electioneering communication, a contribution, or an expenditure”

NRS § 294A.325 explicitly prohibits foreign nationals from making contributions directly or indirectly to candidates and campaign committees via statute. The prohibition is enumerated exhaustively across multiple recipient categories (candidates, PACs, political parties, etc.), backed by a defined penalty (gross misdemeanor under subsection 5), and includes a verification procedure (subsection 3 allows reliance on U.S. passport documentation as a safe harbor). The statute provides clear statutory grounding without delegating the core prohibition to regulation or administrative discretion.

The statute explicitly prohibits candidates and campaign committees from accepting contributions from foreign corporations in unambiguous, statutory language. The prohibition is codified in the statute itself, not delegated to administrative discretion, and applies regardless of whether the foreign entity does business in North Carolina. This satisfies the criterion's requirement that a foreign-source prohibition be grounded in statute.

“No candidate, political committee, political party, affiliated party committee, or treasurer shall accept any contribution made by any corporation, foreign or domestic, regardless of whether such corporation does business in the State of North Carolina”

§ 16.1-08.1-03.15 codifies an explicit foreign-funding prohibition with comprehensive definition of 'foreign national' (foreign government, foreign political party, foreign corporation, foreign citizen, non-resident non-citizen). Both contributions AND expenditures prohibited, directly and indirectly. Solicitation/acceptance also prohibited per subsection 2.

“A foreign national may not make or offer to make, directly or indirectly, a contribution or expenditure in connection with any election.”

ORS 260.416(2)(a) explicitly prohibits foreign nationals, foreign corporations, and foreign entities from making candidate campaign contributions or expenditures. The statute provides a statutory definition of 'foreign national' by reference to federal law (22 U.S.C. 611(b)) with enumerated exceptions for U.S. citizens, nationals, lawfully permanent residents, and Oregon residents, establishing clear statutory procedure and enumeration.

§ 1633(a) codifies an unlawful-contribution rule applying to 'any National or State bank, or any corporation, incorporated under the laws of this or any other state or any foreign country or any unincorporated association' from making campaign contributions or expenditures. § 1634(c) further caps any-country currency contributions at $100. Direct foreign prohibition codified.

“any corporation, incorporated under the laws of this or any other state or any foreign country”

Article 132 § 3-4 explicitly restricts financial sources for electoral committees to Polish citizens with permanent residence in Poland and bank credits. § 4 similarly restricts sources for presidential candidates to Polish citizens, political party funds, and bank credits. This statutory language directly prohibits foreign sources by limiting permissible sources to domestic actors only.

Article 8(1) explicitly prohibits political parties from receiving donations or loans in money or kind from foreign legal persons ('pessoas coletivas...estrangeiras'). The prohibition is statutorily grounded with no carve-outs except for bank loans under specified conditions. The scope covers both direct contributions and in-kind transfers from foreign sources.

“Os partidos políticos não podem receber donativos anónimos nem receber donativos ou empréstimos de natureza pecuniária ou em espécie de pessoas coletivas nacionais ou estrangeiras”

Article 58 codifies the prohibition on foreign sources for electoral funds (foreign citizens, foreign legal entities, international organizations, etc.). Article 3 codifies principles. Article 4 (citizens-only suffrage). Comprehensive foreign-source prohibition for campaign funding.

Finance Law Article 12 codifies a complete foreign-source prohibition: foreign states, foreign individuals and legal entities (except international political associations), anonymous donors, public enterprises, churches, gambling operators, importers, exporters, excise-goods producers — all banned.

“Забрањено је финансирање политичког субјекта од: страних држава; страних физичких и правних лица, осим међународних политичких удружења”

Article 128.2 of LOREG explicitly prohibits contributions to electoral accounts from foreign entities and persons in clear statutory language. The prohibition is codified in the statute itself, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion. The statute does enumerate a narrow exception for EU budget allocations for European Parliament elections, demonstrating precise statutory grounding of both the rule and its exceptions.

“Queda igualmente prohibida la aportación a estas cuentas de fondos procedentes de Entidades o personas extranjeras”

Law 6271 Article 14(1) explicitly prohibits presidential candidates from accepting donations from foreign states, international organizations, foreign legal entities, and non-Turkish-national natural persons. Reinforced by Law 2820 Articles 66 and 79.

Art. IV-215 codifies electoral-fund formation with explicit prohibition on foreign-source contributions. Art. II-75 codifies presidential candidate eligibility (citizenship requirement). Art. III-134 codifies MP candidate eligibility. Art. I-58 / I-59 codify foreign-state limited to observation only. Foreign-source prohibition statutorily codified.

52 USC § 30121 codifies a direct + indirect prohibition on foreign-national contributions to candidates, parties, committees, and electioneering communications, plus solicitation/acceptance bar.

RCW 29B.40.050(1) explicitly prohibits foreign nationals from making contributions to candidates or political committees, grounding the prohibition directly in statute rather than regulation or administrative discretion. The statute provides clear enumeration of prohibited conduct (contributions, expenditures, political advertising, electioneering communications).

“A foreign national may not make a contribution to any candidate or political committee, make an expenditure in support of or in opposition to any candidate or ballot measure, or sponsor political advertising or an electioneering communication.”

The statute explicitly prohibits foreign nationals from making direct or indirect contributions to candidate committees and political committees. The prohibition is codified in statute, covers express and implied promises, and applies to both direct and indirect contributions. This satisfies the statutory-grounding requirement for FOR.1.

This section requires affirmation that contributors are not foreign nationals and have not knowingly accepted prohibited contributions, but it does not explicitly prohibit foreign contributions in statutory language—it only requires verification through treasurer attestation. The statute mandates a disclosure/certification mechanism rather than an affirmative prohibition with defined violation and enforcement procedures, leaving the substantive prohibition implicit rather than codified as direct statutory language.

The statute clearly prohibits foreign sources from making independent expenditures and bars independent expenditure committees from knowingly accepting foreign donations. However, the section does not address direct contributions to candidate committees or campaign committees themselves—it addresses only independent expenditures and independent expenditure committees. The statute thus addresses foreign-source restrictions for one class of political spending but leaves the prohibition on direct candidate-committee contributions potentially unaddressed in this particular section.

§ 12 of the Funding Law enumerates eligible donors (Lithuanian citizens, EU permanent residents, specified legal persons) and thereby excludes foreign nationals from making donations to political parties and campaigns; the surfaced § 2 covers voter qualifications rather than donor eligibility.

The statute includes a categorical prohibition on expenditures by foreign nationals, with definitions anchored to federal law. However, the section addresses prohibited *expenditures* by foreign nationals, not their *contributions* to candidates or campaign committees. The text does not explicitly prohibit foreign nationals from making contributions to campaigns; it only prohibits them from making expenditures. FOR.1 requires a direct foreign contribution prohibition, which is not clearly articulated here—the provision is limited to spending, not receiving money from abroad.

“By any foreign national, as defined in 52 U.S.C. section 30121(b) and 11 C.F.R. section 110.20(a)(3).”

§ 14-107 (Independent expenditure reporting) requires disclosure of expenditure-source. § 14-114 (foreign-source prohibition, not in FTS top-5 for this datapoint) explicitly prohibits foreign-national contributions consistent with 52 USC § 30121. Foreign-source prohibition codified in ELN with reference to federal preemption.

The section prohibits transactions involving non-authorised participants (defined by reference to 'permissible donor' in s.54(2)), which encompasses the foreign-source concept. However, this excerpt does not itself define 'permissible donor' or explicitly state which foreign sources are prohibited—those definitions lie in s.54(2), not in s.71H. The prohibition is statutorily grounded but the operative definitional element is cross-referenced rather than self-contained, making the procedural clarity partial rather than complete.

“A registered party must not— a be a party to a regulated transaction to which any of the other parties is not an authorised participant; b derive a benefit in consequence of a connected transaction if any of the parties to that transaction is not an authorised participant.”

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 97.021 — Florida election code definitions. Does not codify a foreign-source contribution prohibition specifically (FL relies on 52 U.S.C. § 30121 federal preemption for foreign-source ban).

Article 45 (election campaign) codifies equal rights for parties + campaigning rules. Article 23 (precincts) — unrelated. Specific foreign-contribution prohibition lives in Law on Political Unions (Article 24-25) which is a separate instrument from the Election Code. The Election Code's Article 84 (in v0 ELIG.1 cands) references Law on Political Unions for liability.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 21-2-217 codifies rules for determining elector residence (not foreign-source contribution). Foreign-source contribution prohibition lives in federal FEC framework + O.C.G.A. § 21-5-30.2 (separate chapter, not ingested).

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 2 addresses voter eligibility for Greenlandic citizens temporarily residing abroad, not campaign finance or foreign-source contributions. It contains no prohibition on foreign contributions, no definition of foreign sources, no enforcement mechanism, or any campaign-finance procedure whatsoever. This is electoral-procedure text unrelated to the criterion.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section (Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-102) governs mail-ballot procedures and does not address foreign-source contributions, their prohibition, or verification mechanisms. The criterion requires a statutory prohibition on direct foreign contributions to candidates or campaign committees, which is not present in this section. A foreign-source rule would typically appear in a campaign-finance disclosure or contribution-limit provision, not in election administration procedures.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section concerns voting-system procurement and the Voting System Commission's composition and duties. It does not address campaign contributions, candidate funding, or campaign committee finances. The foreign-source affidavit requirement in subsection L applies only to voting-system vendors, not to campaign contributors or donors to candidates. FOR.1 requires a statutory prohibition on direct foreign contributions to candidates or campaign committees, which is entirely absent from this section.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 40 establishes a procedural requirement for treasurers and independent candidates to declare that donations are from permissible donors, but the section does not itself define what constitutes a 'permissible donor' or prohibit foreign-source contributions. The substance of the foreign-source prohibition, if it exists, must be located elsewhere in the Act (likely in the definition of 'permissible donor' in earlier articles). This section addresses only the declaration and attestation procedure, not the statutory prohibition itself.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

This section prohibits contributions by foreign corporations/joint stock companies, but does not address foreign individuals or foreign governments directly, and is framed as a corporate/labor prohibition rather than a foreign-source prohibition. It is not a comprehensive foreign-source ban.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

Article 1(m) defines 'Nederlandse gever' (Dutch contributor) as a person eligible to vote in Tweede Kamer elections or a registered Dutch legal entity/business that makes a contribution to a political party. This definition establishes the eligible contributor class and implicitly acknowledges foreign sources exist, but the section is definitional only. It does not contain an explicit statutory prohibition of foreign contributions; rather, it defines who may contribute. The prohibition itself would need to appear in a substantive provision (likely elsewhere in the Wfpp) to fully satisfy FOR.1.

“Nederlandse gever: een voor de verkiezing van de leden van de Tweede Kamer kiesgerechtigde persoon of een in het Handelsregister ingeschreven rechtspersoon of onderneming, die een bijdrage verleent aan een politieke partij”

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section regulates loans to fund contributions by domestic entities and exempts certain financial institutions—it does not address foreign-source contributions or any prohibition on direct contributions by foreign sources. The criterion requires a statutory prohibition on direct foreign contributions to candidates or campaign committees; this section contains no such prohibition or foreign-source restriction.

No matching sections in corpus.

§ 21-9 codifies overtredelsesgebyr (penalty fees) for election-law violations including foreign-source breaches. Foreign-source contribution prohibition is in Partiloven (Party Act) § 17a — separate instrument; that law prohibits party contributions from foreign donors. Not directly codified within Valgloven itself.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: ORC 3501.90 codifies a cause of action for election-law harassment; not a foreign-source contribution prohibition.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section § 26-7-103.2 addresses voter registration list access and prohibits foreign nationals from receiving voter lists for campaign use, but it does not prohibit direct foreign contributions to candidates or campaign committees. The section regulates data access, not contribution sources. FOR.1 requires a statutory prohibition on foreign funding of campaigns, which is not present in this section.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 17-25-3 is a definitional section that establishes terminology for Rhode Island's campaign-finance chapter. It does not contain or reference any prohibition on foreign-source contributions to candidates or campaign committees. The section defines key terms (candidate, contributions, political action committee, etc.) but contains no statutory language addressing foreign sources, foreign nationals, or foreign entities. A substantive foreign-contribution prohibition would be found in a different section (likely within Rhode Island's substantive campaign-finance restrictions), not in this definitional provision.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

Section 96(2)(d) mentions prohibition on 'receiving any funds from...any foreign sources' as a penalty sanction that courts may impose for contravention of Part 1. However, this section establishes only discretionary court-imposed sanctions for violations, not a statutory prohibition of foreign contributions itself. The section presupposes that Part 1 contains substantive rules about foreign sources, but this excerpt does not articulate what those rules are or whether foreign contributions are categorically prohibited by statute. The foreign-source limit is referenced only as a potential penalty consequence, not as an enumerated statutory rule.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 2154 concerns the statewide voter checklist. No state-law prohibition on foreign-source campaign contributions was surfaced (foreign-national contributions are barred by federal law).

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.