Methodologyevci-v0

EVCIElection Voter-Confidence Index

How well does the framework support voter confidence and audit?

6 datapoints · 3 dimensions · 94 jurisdictions scored

Jurisdiction Scores

JurisdictionScoreRaw
New Yorkus-ny100.0%6/6
Floridaus-fl91.7%6/6
Denmarkdk83.3%5/6
Georgiaus-ga83.3%5/6
Coloradous-co75.0%5/6
Connecticutus-ct75.0%5/6
Texasus-tx75.0%5/6
Finlandfi66.7%4/6
Georgiage66.7%4/6
Turkeytr66.7%4/6
Ukraineua66.7%4/6
Louisianaus-la66.7%4/6
Nevadaus-nv66.7%4/6
South Dakotaus-sd66.7%4/6
Oregonus-or60.0%3/5
Belgiumbe58.3%4/6
Norwayno58.3%4/6
Swedense58.3%4/6
Alaskaus-ak58.3%4/6
Kentuckyus-ky58.3%4/6
Minnesotaus-mn58.3%4/6
North Dakotaus-nd58.3%4/6
Ohious-oh58.3%4/6
Rhode Islandus-ri58.3%4/6
Virginiaus-va58.3%4/6
Vermontus-vt58.3%4/6
Arizonaus-az50.0%3/6
Delawareus-de50.0%3/6
Idahous-id50.0%3/6
Kansasus-ks50.0%3/6
Montanaus-mt50.0%3/6
North Carolinaus-nc50.0%3/6
Nebraskaus-ne50.0%3/6
Tennesseeus-tn50.0%3/6
Wisconsinus-wi50.0%3/6
West Virginiaus-wv45.8%3/6
Austriaat41.7%3/6
Lithuanialt41.7%3/6
Luxembourglu41.7%3/6
Latvialv41.7%3/6
Netherlandsnl41.7%3/6
Romaniaro41.7%3/6
United Statesus41.7%3/6
Alabamaus-al41.7%3/6
Hawaiius-hi41.7%3/6
Missourius-mo41.7%3/6
New Jerseyus-nj41.7%3/6
Pennsylvaniaus-pa41.7%3/6
Utahus-ut41.7%3/6
Washingtonus-wa41.7%3/6
Wyomingus-wy41.7%3/6
United Kingdomgb40.0%2/5
Polandpl40.0%2/5
Germanyde38.3%2/6
Mexicomx38.3%2/6
Oklahomaus-ok38.3%2/6
Armeniaam33.3%2/6
Bulgariabg33.3%2/6
Estoniaee33.3%2/6
Greecegr33.3%2/6
Icelandis33.3%2/6
Portugalpt33.3%2/6
Russiaru33.3%2/6
Iowaus-ia33.3%2/6
Indianaus-in33.3%2/6
New Mexicous-nm33.3%2/6
South Carolinaus-sc33.3%2/6
Spaines31.7%2/6
Kazakhstankz30.0%2/5
Massachusettsus-ma30.0%2/6
Maineus-me30.0%2/6
Argentinaar25.0%2/6
Belarusby25.0%2/6
Czechiacz25.0%2/6
Francefr25.0%2/6
Irelandie25.0%2/6
Madagascarmg25.0%2/6
Maltamt25.0%2/6
Arkansasus-ar25.0%2/6
Illinoisus-il25.0%2/6
Mississippius-ms25.0%2/6
South Africaza25.0%2/6
Canadaca23.3%1/6
Croatiahr21.7%1/6
Brazilbr20.0%1/5
Chinacn16.7%1/3
Greenlandgl16.7%1/6
Moldovamd16.7%1/6
Serbiasr16.7%1/6
Californiaus-ca16.7%1/6
Marylandus-md16.7%1/6
Michiganus-mi16.7%1/6
New Hampshireus-nh16.7%1/6
Australiaau8.3%1/6

Datapoint × Jurisdiction Heatmap

Each row is a datapoint; each column a jurisdiction. Color encodes the percent of the maximum score achieved. Cells without data are blank.

Datapoints — by Dimension

Ballot Info 2 datapoints

CodeNameus-nyus-fldkus-gaus-cous-ctus-txfigetruaus-laus-nvus-sdus-orbenoseus-akus-kyus-mnus-ndus-ohus-rius-vaus-vtus-azus-deus-idus-ksus-mtus-ncus-neus-tnus-wius-wvatltlulvnlrousus-alus-hius-mous-njus-paus-utus-waus-wygbpldemxus-okambgeegrisptruus-iaus-inus-nmus-sceskzus-maus-mearbyczfriemgmtus-arus-ilus-mszacahrbrcnglmdsrus-caus-mdus-mius-nhau
INFO.1Statutory ballot information pamphlet
Is there a statutory requirement to publish a voter pamphlet (or analog) with candidate and ballot-question information, with content and distribution defined?
1/11/11/11/10.5/11/10.5/11/11/11/11/10/10.5/11/10.5/10.5/11/11/11/10/11/11/10/10.5/10/11/10.5/10/10.5/10.5/11/11/10/10.5/11/10.5/10/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/11/10/10.5/11/10.5/10.5/10/11/11/10/10/10.5/10.3/10.5/10.3/10/10/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/10/10.5/10/10.5/10.3/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/11/10/10/10/10/1
INFO.2Multilingual ballot requirement
Are the triggers for multilingual ballots and voter materials set by statute (population thresholds, language-minority criteria)?
1/11/10/10/11/11/11/10/10/10/10/11/10.5/10/11/10.5/10/10/10/10/11/10/10/11/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/11/10/10.5/10.5/11/10/10/10/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/1

Candidate 2 datapoints

CodeNameus-nyus-fldkus-gaus-cous-ctus-txfigetruaus-laus-nvus-sdus-orbenoseus-akus-kyus-mnus-ndus-ohus-rius-vaus-vtus-azus-deus-idus-ksus-mtus-ncus-neus-tnus-wius-wvatltlulvnlrousus-alus-hius-mous-njus-paus-utus-waus-wygbpldemxus-okambgeegrisptruus-iaus-inus-nmus-sceskzus-maus-mearbyczfriemgmtus-arus-ilus-mszacahrbrcnglmdsrus-caus-mdus-mius-nhau
CAND.1Candidate-filing public access
Are candidate-filing documents (nominating petitions, eligibility certifications) required by statute to be publicly accessible within a defined time?
1/11/11/11/10.5/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/10/11/10.5/11/11/10.5/10.5/11/10/11/11/11/10/10.5/10/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/10.5/11/10/11/11/10.5/10.5/11/11/11/10.5/10/10/10.5/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/10/10/11/10.5/10.5/11/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/11/10/10.5/10.5/10/10.5/10.5/11/10.5/10/10.5/10/11/10.5/10/10.5/11/10/10.5/10/11/10/10.5/10.5/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/10/10/11/10.5/10/1
CAND.2Candidate disqualification publication
If a candidate is disqualified or withdraws after the ballot is printed, is the public-notice procedure codified in statute?
1/10.5/11/11/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/11/11/11/11/11/10/10.5/10.5/10/10/10.5/11/10/10/10.5/10/11/10.5/11/10.5/10.5/10/10/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/11/10.5/10/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/10/10.5/11/10/10/10.5/11/10.5/11/10.5/11/10/11/10/10/10/10/10/10.5/10.5/11/10.5/10.5/10/10/10.5/10/10/11/10.5/10.5/10/10.5/11/10/10.5/10/10/10.5/10/10/10.5/10/10/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/10.5/10/1

Notification 2 datapoints

CodeNameus-nyus-fldkus-gaus-cous-ctus-txfigetruaus-laus-nvus-sdus-orbenoseus-akus-kyus-mnus-ndus-ohus-rius-vaus-vtus-azus-deus-idus-ksus-mtus-ncus-neus-tnus-wius-wvatltlulvnlrousus-alus-hius-mous-njus-paus-utus-waus-wygbpldemxus-okambgeegrisptruus-iaus-inus-nmus-sceskzus-maus-mearbyczfriemgmtus-arus-ilus-mszacahrbrcnglmdsrus-caus-mdus-mius-nhau
NOTIF.1Pre-election notice in statute
Is the requirement to notify voters of an upcoming election (date, polling place, registration deadline) set in statute with timing and content defined?
1/11/11/11/11/10.5/10.5/11/11/11/11/10.5/11/11/10.5/11/11/11/11/10.5/11/11/11/11/10.5/11/11/11/11/11/11/10/11/11/11/10.3/10.5/10.5/11/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/11/10.5/11/10/10.5/11/11/10.5/10.5/10/10.5/11/11/11/11/10.5/10.5/11/10/10.5/10.5/11/10.4/10.5/10.3/10.5/10.5/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/10/11/11/10.5/10.4/10.3/10.5/10.5/10/11/10/10.5/10/10/10/1
NOTIF.2Polling-place change notice
If a voter's polling place changes between elections, is there a statutory requirement to provide individual notice within a defined timeframe?
1/11/11/11/10.5/10.5/11/10.5/10/10/10/10.5/11/11/10/10.5/11/10.5/11/10.5/10.5/11/10/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/10.5/11/10.5/11/10.5/10.5/10/11/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/10/10.5/10/10.5/10/10.5/10/10/10.5/10.5/10.3/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/10/10.5/10/11/10/10/10/11/10/10/10/10/10/10.5/10/10/10.5/1

About this score

Per-jurisdiction scores are SUM(score) / SUM(max_score) across the datapoints above. Each datapoint has a scoring rule (binary / ordinal / etc.) defined in the methodology, and an evidence quote pinned to the exact statute section that justifies the score. See the per-datapoint page for the full rationale and the source citation.

≥ 50%70.0% strong30–50%40.0% moderate15–30%20.0% gap< 15%5.0% minimal