Methodologyedri-v0

EDRIElection Dispute Resolution Index

How robust are mechanisms to resolve election disputes?

10 datapoints · 3 dimensions · 95 jurisdictions scored

Jurisdiction Scores

JurisdictionScoreRaw
Swedense86.4%10/11
Canadaca81.8%9/11
Estoniaee81.8%9/11
Norwayno81.8%9/11
Californiaus-ca81.8%9/11
Montanaus-mt81.8%9/11
Georgiaus-ga72.7%8/11
Indianaus-in72.7%8/11
Ohious-oh72.7%8/11
Utahus-ut72.7%8/11
Latvialv68.2%8/11
Kentuckyus-ky68.2%8/11
North Carolinaus-nc68.2%8/11
Denmarkdk63.6%7/11
Moldovamd63.6%7/11
Mexicomx63.6%7/11
Alabamaus-al63.6%7/11
Coloradous-co63.6%7/11
Connecticutus-ct63.6%7/11
North Dakotaus-nd63.6%7/11
Texasus-tx63.6%7/11
Australiaau62.7%7/11
Massachusettsus-ma60.5%7/11
Oregonus-or60.0%6/10
Lithuanialt59.1%7/11
Louisianaus-la59.1%7/11
Michiganus-mi59.1%7/11
Oklahomaus-ok59.1%7/11
Wisconsinus-wi59.1%7/11
West Virginiaus-wv59.1%7/11
Wyomingus-wy57.3%6/11
Netherlandsnl54.5%6/11
Illinoisus-il54.5%6/11
Missourius-mo54.5%6/11
New Hampshireus-nh54.5%6/11
Pennsylvaniaus-pa54.5%6/11
Virginiaus-va54.5%6/11
Idahous-id51.0%5/10
Spaines50.0%6/11
Finlandfi50.0%6/11
Francefr50.0%6/11
Alaskaus-ak50.0%6/11
Nebraskaus-ne50.0%6/11
Washingtonus-wa50.0%6/11
South Africaza50.0%6/11
Portugalpt48.2%5/11
Czechiacz45.5%5/11
Arkansasus-ar45.5%5/11
Arizonaus-az45.5%5/11
New Yorkus-ny45.5%5/11
Rhode Islandus-ri45.5%5/11
Irelandie45.0%5/10
Nevadaus-nv45.0%5/10
Brazilbr40.9%5/11
Romaniaro40.9%5/11
Minnesotaus-mn40.9%5/11
New Mexicous-nm40.9%5/11
Argentinaar40.0%4/11
Hawaiius-hi40.0%4/11
Icelandis36.4%4/11
Luxembourglu36.4%4/11
Polandpl36.4%4/11
Floridaus-fl36.4%4/11
Kansasus-ks36.4%4/11
Mississippius-ms36.4%4/11
South Dakotaus-sd36.4%4/11
Vermontus-vt36.4%4/11
Austriaat31.8%4/11
Belgiumbe31.8%4/11
Germanyde31.8%4/11
Greenlandgl31.8%4/11
Croatiahr31.8%4/11
Ukraineua31.8%4/11
Delawareus-de31.8%4/11
Maineus-me31.8%4/11
Tennesseeus-tn31.8%4/11
United Kingdomgb30.0%3/10
Bulgariabg27.3%3/11
Greecegr27.3%3/11
Madagascarmg27.3%3/11
Russiaru27.3%3/11
Serbiasr27.3%3/11
Turkeytr27.3%3/11
Marylandus-md27.3%3/11
Iowaus-ia22.7%3/11
Armeniaam18.2%2/11
Georgiage18.2%2/11
New Jerseyus-nj18.2%2/11
Kazakhstankz17.3%2/11
Maltamt17.3%2/11
Chinacn10.0%1/10
United Statesus9.1%1/11
Belarusby4.5%1/11
South Carolinaus-sc4.5%1/11
North Koreakp0.0%0/5

Datapoint × Jurisdiction Heatmap

Each row is a datapoint; each column a jurisdiction. Color encodes the percent of the maximum score achieved. Cells without data are blank.

Datapoints — by Dimension

Contest 4 datapoints

CodeNamesecaeenous-caus-mtus-gaus-inus-ohus-utlvus-kyus-ncdkmdmxus-alus-cous-ctus-ndus-txauus-maus-orltus-laus-mius-okus-wius-wvus-wynlus-ilus-mous-nhus-paus-vaus-idesfifrus-akus-neus-wazaptczus-arus-azus-nyus-riieus-nvbrrous-mnus-nmarus-hiisluplus-flus-ksus-msus-sdus-vtatbedeglhruaus-deus-meus-tngbbggrmgrusrtrus-mdus-iaamgeus-njkzmtcnusbyus-sckp
CONT.EDRI.1Standing enumerated
Are the parties with standing to contest an election (candidate, party, qualified voters of the precinct, AG, etc.) enumerated in statute?
1/11/11/11/10/11/10/11/11/10/11/11/10.5/11/11/11/10.5/10/11/11/10/11/10/10/11/11/10/10/10.5/10.5/11/11/11/10/10/10/11/10/11/11/10.5/10/10/10/10.5/11/11/10/10.5/10/10/10.5/10/11/11/10/10/10.5/10/10.5/10/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/10.5/11/11/11/10/10/10/11/10/11/11/11/10/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/1
CONT.EDRI.2Venue & jurisdiction
Is the court of original jurisdiction for election contests specified by statute?
1/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/10.5/11/11/11/10.5/11/11/10.5/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/10.5/11/10/11/11/10/11/11/11/10.5/11/11/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/11/11/11/11/11/10.5/10.5/11/11/11/10/10/10/11/10/10/11/10/10.5/11/11/10/10/10/11/11/11/10.5/11/10/11/11/10/10/10/10/10/10.4/11/10.5/10/10/10/10/1
CONT.EDRI.3Filing deadline
Is the deadline for filing an election contest (days after certification, or after a defined event) specified by statute?
1/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/10/10.5/11/11/10/11/11/11/11/11/11/10/11/10/10/10/10/11/11/10.5/10/11/11/11/11/11/10.5/10.5/11/10.5/10.5/10/10.5/11/11/10.5/10/11/11/11/11/10.5/11/10/10/10/11/11/11/11/10/10/11/10/10/11/11/11/10/11/10/10.5/10/10/11/10/10.5/10.5/10/11/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/1
CONT.EDRI.4Standard of proof & evidence
Are the standard of proof and admissibility rules for election-contest evidence codified in statute?
2/21/21/22/22/22/21/21/20/22/21/20/21/20/21/21/21/21/21/21/21/21/21/21/21/22/21/21/20/21/21/21/21/21/21/20/20/21/21.5/20/21/20/21/21/21/21/21/20/20/20/20/20/20/21/20/20/20/21/21/21/20/21/20/20/20/20/20/21/21/20/20/20/20/21/20/21/21/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/20/2

Recount 4 datapoints

CodeNamesecaeenous-caus-mtus-gaus-inus-ohus-utlvus-kyus-ncdkmdmxus-alus-cous-ctus-ndus-txauus-maus-orltus-laus-mius-okus-wius-wvus-wynlus-ilus-mous-nhus-paus-vaus-idesfifrus-akus-neus-wazaptczus-arus-azus-nyus-riieus-nvbrrous-mnus-nmarus-hiisluplus-flus-ksus-msus-sdus-vtatbedeglhruaus-deus-meus-tngbbggrmgrusrtrus-mdus-iaamgeus-njkzmtcnusbyus-sckp
RECT.1Statutory recount procedure
Are recount procedures (who counts, how, with what evidence) defined in statute, not regulation or administrative directive?
1/11/11/11/11/11/11/10.5/11/11/11/11/10.5/11/10/11/11/10/11/10/11/11/10.7/10.5/11/11/11/11/11/10.5/10/11/11/10/10.5/11/11/10.6/10.5/11/10.5/11/11/11/10.5/10/10/11/10.5/11/10.5/10/10.5/10/10/11/11/11/10.4/10/10.5/10/11/11/10/10.5/11/10/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/10/10/10/11/10/10/10/11/11/10.5/10/10.5/10.4/10/10.5/10/10/1
RECT.2Recount triggers enumerated
Are the triggers for an automatic or petition-based recount enumerated in statute (margin thresholds, sworn challenge, etc.)?
1/11/11/10/11/11/11/10.5/11/11/11/11/11/10/10.5/11/10.5/11/10/11/11/10.4/11/11/10/10/11/11/11/10/10/11/10/10.5/10.5/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/11/10/10.5/10/10/10/11/11/11/10.5/10/10.5/10/10/11/10.4/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/11/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/1
RECT.3Recount cost allocation
Is the cost of a petition-based recount allocated by statute (who pays under what outcome)?
0/11/10/10/11/11/10/10.5/11/11/10/11/10.5/11/10/10/11/11/10.5/10/11/10/10/11/10/10.5/10.5/11/11/10.5/11/10/11/11/11/10.5/11/11/10/11/10/11/11/11/10/10/10/11/11/10/11/10/11/10/10/11/11/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/11/10/10/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/11/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/11/10.5/10/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/10/1
RECT.4Recount-finding effect
Are the legal effects of a recount finding (binding, advisory, mandatory amendment) codified in statute?
1/11/11/11/11/10.5/11/10.5/11/11/11/11/11/11/10.5/10.5/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/10.5/10/11/10.5/11/10.5/11/10/10/10/11/11/11/10/10/11/10.5/11/10/11/10.5/10/10/11/11/10/11/11/10/10/10/10.5/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/11/11/10/11/10.5/10/10/10.5/10.5/10/11/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/11/10/10/10/10/11/10.5/11/10/10/10/10/10/10/1

Timing 2 datapoints

CodeNamesecaeenous-caus-mtus-gaus-inus-ohus-utlvus-kyus-ncdkmdmxus-alus-cous-ctus-ndus-txauus-maus-orltus-laus-mius-okus-wius-wvus-wynlus-ilus-mous-nhus-paus-vaus-idesfifrus-akus-neus-wazaptczus-arus-azus-nyus-riieus-nvbrrous-mnus-nmarus-hiisluplus-flus-ksus-msus-sdus-vtatbedeglhruaus-deus-meus-tngbbggrmgrusrtrus-mdus-iaamgeus-njkzmtcnusbyus-sckp
TIME.1Certification deadline in statute
Is the certification deadline (when the result becomes 'official') set by statute, not by administrative discretion?
1/10.5/11/11/11/10.5/11/11/11/10/10.5/10.5/11/10.5/11/10.5/11/11/10/11/10.5/10.5/11/11/11/11/11/11/11/10.5/10.3/10.5/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/10.5/10.5/11/11/10.5/10.5/10/11/11/11/10.5/11/10.5/11/10.5/10.5/11/10.5/11/11/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/10.5/11/11/11/11/11/10.5/10.5/10.5/10/10.5/10.5/11/10.5/11/10/10/11/11/10.5/11/10/11/11/11/10/11/10.5/10.5/10/10/10.5/10.5/10.5/1
TIME.2Pre-certification stay
Does statute provide a mechanism to stay certification while a recount or contest is pending?
0.5/10.5/11/11/10/10/11/11/10/10/10/10/11/11/11/10/10.5/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/11/10/10/10/11/10/11/10/10/10/10.5/10.5/10/10/10/10.3/10.5/10/10/10.5/10/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/11/10/11/10/11/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/10/10.5/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10/10.5/10/10/10/10/1

About this score

Per-jurisdiction scores are SUM(score) / SUM(max_score) across the datapoints above. Each datapoint has a scoring rule (binary / ordinal / etc.) defined in the methodology, and an evidence quote pinned to the exact statute section that justifies the score. See the per-datapoint page for the full rationale and the source citation.

≥ 50%70.0% strong30–50%40.0% moderate15–30%20.0% gap< 15%5.0% minimal