Reproducible builds requirement

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section criminalizes unlawful interference with elections, including unauthorized alteration of ballots and election materials. It does not address software reproducibility, binary builds, or source code verification requirements. The criterion concerns technical requirements for election software builds; this statute concerns election fraud and ballot tampering crimes.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses precinct register preparation, content, delivery, and use restrictions. It does not address software reproducibility, binary builds, source code publication, or any technical requirements for election system software. The criterion concerns reproducible builds of production binaries from public source code, which is entirely outside the scope of this statutory section.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the reproduction and distribution of computerized voter registration lists by county clerks, including formatting, fees, and handling of secure voter information. It does not concern software, source code, reproducible builds, or any technical requirements for compiling binaries used in election systems.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the physical reproduction and distribution of postal vote application forms and copyright considerations. It contains no reference to software, binary builds, reproducibility, source code, or any technical infrastructure requirements relevant to the reproducible builds criterion.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 15302 codifies the official canvass tasks (inspection, reconciliation, recount) — not reproducible builds of voting software. CA does not codify a reproducible-build requirement.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section of Connecticut election law concerns the availability and distribution of preliminary voter registry lists to candidates and the public. It does not address software, binary reproducibility, builds, or any technical requirement related to election systems or voting technology. The criterion concerns reproducible builds of election software, which is entirely outside the scope of this statute section.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 99.095 candidate petition process. Off-topic.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This statute concerns the furnishing of registered elector lists to the public and restrictions on their use. It does not address software, binary reproducibility, or source code transparency. The criterion relates to election system software infrastructure, which is entirely outside the scope of this section's subject matter.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: 10 ILCS 5/4-33 governs computerization of voter records, not voting-system build reproducibility.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the physical reproduction of voter registration forms for record-keeping purposes, not software reproducibility or binary builds. It is entirely unrelated to the software development and verification practices contemplated by the criterion.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 207 of the Electoral Reform Act 2022 addresses offences and penalties for political parties and their officers in relation to electoral conduct. It is entirely unrelated to software, binary code, reproducible builds, or any technical requirements for election systems. The criterion concerns software verifiability and reproducible builds, which is a technical governance matter outside the scope of this penal provision.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses election fraud offenses and penalties related to voter registration and voting procedures. It has no bearing on software reproducibility, binary builds, or any technical infrastructure requirements. The criterion concerns whether production binaries can be reproducibly built from public source code—a topic completely outside the scope of this criminal law provision.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the physical production, packaging, and distribution of official ballots by the Secretary of State. It contains no provisions regarding software, source code, binary builds, or reproducibility of any digital systems. The criterion concerns software reproducibility in a voting system context, which is not addressed by this ballot distribution statute.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section of Malta's General Elections Act deals with repeal of prior electoral ordinances and saving provisions for political party rights. It contains no content related to software, binary reproducibility, or build processes. The criterion concerns technical software integrity requirements, which is entirely outside the scope of this statutory provision.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses unauthorized use, distribution, and possession of ballots—a matter of ballot security and fraud prevention. It contains no requirements or references to reproducible builds, public source code, binary reproducibility, or software development practices. The section is entirely outside the scope of software verifiability criteria.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 14 of LGSMIME establishes rules for admissible evidence in electoral dispute resolution procedures, including documentary, technical, and expert evidence. It contains no provisions regarding software, binary reproducibility, builds, source code, or any technical requirements for election system software verification. This section addresses judicial evidence rules, not software engineering or system transparency standards.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section governs the capture and transmission of voter signatures to the qualified voter file. It addresses administrative procedures for signature handling but contains no provisions regarding software build reproducibility, source code publication, or binary reproducibility. The criterion concerns software development practices; this section is entirely about voter registration administration.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 3-412 (inspector training), § 5-506 (registry list maintenance), § 5-601 (disabled voter accommodation) are FTS-surfaced but unrelated to reproducible builds. No reproducible-build mandate codified.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section concerns the procedural requirements for requesting absentee ballots in North Carolina, including form creation, voter registration confirmation, and delivery methods. It contains no provisions whatsoever related to software, binary builds, source code, reproducibility, or any technical/computational systems. The criterion asks about reproducible builds for production binaries, which is entirely outside the scope of this election administration statute.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section of Ohio election law concerns the identification and disclaimer requirements for political communications and advertisements. It addresses who must be named in political publications, ads, and telephone communications. It contains no provisions related to software, binary reproducibility, builds, source code, or any technical infrastructure requirements.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the reproduction and distribution of physical ballots for educational purposes and does not concern software, binary builds, reproducibility, or any aspect of electronic voting systems or code compilation. It is entirely outside the scope of the software verifiability criterion.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 1401 addresses the content and organization of voter registration records, including registration cards, digitized signatures, and SURE system information. It contains no requirements regarding reproducible builds, public source code, binary verification, or software development practices. This is a registration management statute, not a software development or procurement standard.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This statute addresses accessible voting methods for blind, visually impaired, and disabled voters through special Braille and tactile mail ballots. It does not address software, binary builds, reproducibility, or any aspect of election system source code or compilation—topics that are central to the software verifiability criterion.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The section requires source code escrow (subsection I) and approval of optical scan voting systems, but it does not mandate or address reproducible builds—the requirement that production binaries be buildable from public source with identical outputs. The statute focuses on system approval, testing, certification compliance, and source code escrow for business continuity, not on the technical requirement for reproducible builds.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 18.010 governs fees for reproducing voter-registration lists — unrelated to reproducible software builds. No reproducible-build requirement is codified.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section of the Representation of the People Act 1983 addresses the application and interpretation of transitional provisions relating to references to statutory matters and Secretary of State powers to make orders. It contains no provisions concerning software, binary builds, source code, reproducibility, or any computational infrastructure. The criterion is entirely inapplicable to this statutory text.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses the criminal prohibition on counterfeiting ballots and ballot-related materials. It is entirely unrelated to software reproducibility, reproducible builds, or the verifiability of binary code in election systems. The criterion concerns technical software engineering practices; this statute concerns ballot fraud penalties.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: RCW 29A.04.260 addresses voter information privacy and disclosure exemptions for ballot return envelopes and signature forms. It contains no provisions regarding software, binary builds, source code, or reproducibility requirements. This section is entirely unrelated to the software verifiability criterion.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section establishes training program requirements for election officials in West Virginia. It does not address software, binary buildability, reproducibility of builds, or source code transparency. The criterion concerns technical reproducibility of production binaries, which is entirely outside the scope of this election official training statute.

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section of the Wyoming Election Code addresses voter registry list availability, form of records, public access rules, and voter registration purging procedures. It contains no provisions regarding software reproducible builds, binary verification, or source code transparency. The criterion concerns technical requirements for election software verification; this section is about voter records management and does not address that topic.