Ukrainev0

EIIElection Integrity Index

How well does the legal framework defend against vote-altering attacks?

Integrity20.8%11/53 · 29 datapoints · 7 dimensionsCompare across jurisdictions →

Dimensions

Citizen Verifiability12.5%
1/8 · 4 datapoints
Custody Hardware25.0%
2/8 · 4 datapoints
Post Election Audit27.8%
3/9 · 5 datapoints
Software Verifiability5.6%
1/9 · 5 datapoints
Transparency Observation50.0%
4/8 · 4 datapoints
Vendor Independence0.0%
0/4 · 4 datapoints
Voter Access14.3%
1/7 · 3 datapoints

Citizen Verifiability

12.5% · 1/8
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
4.1Public verification artifactDoes law mandate a downloadable public package containing certificates, device records, and result signatures?0.5/150.0%

Art. II-79 codifies election-process stages with public-record obligations. Art. III-179 / IV-254 codify continuous commission meetings producing publicly-available protocols. Art. III-187 / IV-282 codify promulgation of results in Holos Ukrainy + Uriadovyy Courier + CEC website. Building blocks of public verification, though not a single signed downloadable package.

§ view source
2026-05-19
4.2End-to-end verifiability permittedDoes law permit (or require) per-voter cryptographic receipts that prove inclusion without revealing the vote?0/50.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19
4.3Voter-verifiable paper trailIs voter-verifiable paper record (VVPAT or hand-marked paper) legally required?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19
4.4Citizen re-tally rightCan any citizen — not just parties — legally re-tally from published precinct data?0.5/150.0%

Art. IV-282 codifies promulgation of results within 5 days. Art. II-100 (presidential candidate disclosures) is unrelated. Precinct-level protocols are publicly posted (Art. II-115 / III-166), enabling citizen re-tally from public data, though standing is limited.

§ view source
2026-05-19

Custody Hardware

25.0% · 2/8
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
2.1Hardware tamper standardAre tamper-evident or tamper-responsive hardware standards mandated?1/520.0%

Art. II-117 codifies polling hours 8:00-20:00 + out-of-country precinct hours. Art. II-115 (not in FTS top-5) codifies ballot-paper packaging by printer with three-copy chain-of-custody protocols posted publicly at district commissions. Tamper-evident handling of physical ballots codified; no voting machines exist to certify.

§ view source
2026-05-19
2.2Network isolation mandateIs internet/Wi-Fi/cellular connectivity legally prohibited on vote-casting equipment?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19
2.3Custody documentationIs full chain-of-custody documentation required and publicly available?1/1100.0%

Art. II-115 codifies comprehensive ballot-paper chain of custody: printer → CEC → district commission with three-copy protocol (one for CEC, one for commission, one posted publicly), then to precinct commissions under the same protocol. Ballot storage requires safe / metal case / separate room. Art. III-166 / IV-242 reinforce for MP and local elections.

A district election commission shall, at its meeting, accept the ballot papers, packaged by the printing enterprise, from a representative of the Central Election Commission
§ view source
2026-05-19
2.4Tamper criminal penaltyAre there explicit criminal penalties for unauthorized device access?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19

Post Election Audit

27.8% · 3/9
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
3.1Mandatory auditIs a post-election audit legally required for every election?0/10.0%

Art. IV-254 codifies territorial-commission continuous meeting after voting to receive and verify precinct protocols (acting as canvass verification). Art. I-35 codifies commission legal personality. No separate post-election manual audit is codified — verification operates through the canvass chain.

§ view source
2026-05-19
3.2Audit methodWhat audit method is mandated?1/520.0%

Art. IV-254 codifies the territorial commission's continuous meeting to verify precinct protocols, with discrepancy-driven recount of precinct results. Art. III-179 reinforces for MP elections. This functions as a paper-based canvass verification rather than a separate fixed-percentage or risk-limiting audit. Ordinal level 1: hand-verification of precinct totals against territorial sum.

§ view source
2026-05-19
3.3Audit triggers beyond mandatoryDoes law trigger additional audits on close margins or sworn challenges?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19
3.4Public observation of auditAre parties, media, and citizens granted observer access to the audit?1/1100.0%

Art. I-47 codifies public information about commission decisions including vote-counting. Art. I-23 (Publicity and Transparency) codifies that election commissions ensure transparency. Art. I-58 codifies official-observer access to all commission meetings including the canvass-verification meetings of district / territorial commissions.

§ view source
2026-05-19
3.5Binding forceAre audit results legally binding on the final certified result?0.5/150.0%

Art. IV-289 codifies supplementary-election procedure when precinct results are invalidated. Art. I-35 codifies commission legal-personality. CEC protocols are binding — codified throughout Books II-IV, with results becoming official upon CEC promulgation (Art. III-187 / IV-282).

§ view source
2026-05-19

Software Verifiability

5.6% · 1/9
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
1.1Source code disclosureIs voting system source code legally accessible?0/50.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Art. III-153 (electoral fund accounts reporting), Art. II-97 (presidential candidate fund reporting) — unrelated to voting-system source code. Ukraine is paper-only; no voting-system source-code regime exists.

§ view source
2026-05-19
1.2Reproducible builds requirementMust the binary that runs in production be reproducibly buildable from public source?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19
1.3Pre-election binary commitmentIs the running binary cryptographically committed (hash published) before polls open?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19
1.4Election definition publicationAre ballot contests, layouts, and tabulation rules signed and published before polls open?0.5/150.0%

Art. III-145 codifies precinct-commission compliance with uniform application of legislation on elections. Art. III-143 / II-86 codify CEC pre-election powers. Art. IV-232 codifies special information support for local elections (registered candidates / ballot information). Art. II-108 codifies repeat-voting procedure. Pre-poll publication of ballot information codified though without cryptographic signature.

§ view source
2026-05-19
1.5Post-election integrity checkDoes law grant a right to verify the actual running binary matches the committed one?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19

Transparency Observation

50.0% · 4/8
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
6.1Domestic observer rightsAre party and civil-society observers given full procedural access?1/1100.0%

Art. I-58 codifies official-observer rights for candidates, parties, and accredited NGOs (with comprehensive disqualification list for aggressor-state nationals). Art. I-60 codifies NGO observer permission (50-day pre-election threshold). Art. III-167 / IV-239 / II-112 codify per-commission registration of observers. Comprehensive domestic observer regime.

Official observers from candidates and parties (party organizations) that are electoral subjects, and from nongovernmental organizations, which have been granted a permission to have official observers in the respective election, in accordance with the procedure established by this Code, may take part in the election process.
§ view source
2026-05-19
6.2International observer accessAre OSCE/EU/IFES international observers admitted by default?1/1100.0%

Art. I-59 codifies international-observer accreditation by CEC: foreign states / international organizations submit proposals directly or via MFA at least 7 days before national / 10 days before local election. CEC issues identification documents and decides accreditation no later than 5 days before voting. Citizens of Ukraine may not be accredited as international observers but may serve as interpreters.

Official observers from foreign states or international organizations shall be accredited by the Central Election Commission.
§ view source
2026-05-19
6.3Precinct-level results publication speedAre precinct-level results legally required to be published within 24h of poll close?2/540.0%

Art. III-187 codifies promulgation of MP election results no later than the 5th day after establishment of results, in two state newspapers + CEC website. Art. II-127 codifies CEC establishment of presidential results within 10 days (no later than the 3rd day after receipt of all district protocols). Art. IV-282 codifies local-election promulgation within 5 days. Ordinal level 2: precinct-level results are accessible within hours via posted commission protocols, with formal promulgation within 5-10 days.

The Central Election Commission shall, no later than the fifth day of the day of establishing the results of the election, promulgate the results of the election of MPs in the newspapers Holos Ukrainy and Uriadovyy Courier, as well as publish them on its official website.
§ view source
2026-05-19
6.4Public election event logIs a public, signed, append-only election event log legally required?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19

Vendor Independence

0.0% · 0/4
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
5.1Multi-vendor capabilityDoes law permit multiple certified vendors to operate in the same election?0/10.0%

Art. III-162 codifies CEC ballot-paper production via state-budget-funded printing-enterprise contracts. Art. IV-242 codifies local-election printing. Multiple printing enterprises permitted by tender; no voting-equipment vendors exist in a paper-only regime.

§ view source
2026-05-19
5.2Open protocol standardsAre vote-format / device-protocol standards open and publicly documented?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19
5.3Contract duration capAre vendor contracts capped in duration, preventing perpetual lock-in?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Art. IV-242 / III-162 / III-163 codify per-election printing-enterprise contracts (no perpetual lock-in possible since contracts are tendered per election cycle). Specific maximum-duration clauses are not codified.

§ view source
2026-05-19
5.4Source-code escrowIs source-code escrow with the state required as a condition of certification?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19

Voter Access

14.3% · 1/7
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
7.1Ballot secrecy guaranteeIs voter–ballot unlinkability legally guaranteed and enforceable?1/1100.0%

Art. I-16 codifies secret voting + prohibits any form of control over voter expression. Art. I-17 codifies personal voting (no proxy, no transfer). Art. I-9 (not surfaced for this datapoint) codifies secret-ballot principle. Reinforced by criminal provisions in the Criminal Code (separate instrument). Strong codified ballot-secrecy mandate.

Voting in elections in Ukraine shall be secret. Any form of control over the content of the expression of a voter’s will, establishing or disclosing the content of a voter’s will with regard to a particular voter shall be prohibited.
§ view source
2026-05-19
7.2Accessibility mandateAre accessibility standards (vision, motor, language) legally required at every polling place?0/50.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19
7.3Polling-place density floorIs there a legal floor on polling places per N voters or per geographic area?0/10.0%

Art. II-121 / III-176 / IV-251 codify precinct-commission protocols. Art. II-122 / III-177 codify grounds to declare voting in a precinct invalid. Precinct establishment is codified in Art. I-30 (regular precincts up to 2,500 voters; large precincts subject to special procedures) but not in the FTS top-5 for this datapoint.

§ view source
2026-05-19

Other methodologies for Ukraine