EIIElection Integrity Index
How well does the legal framework defend against vote-altering attacks?
Dimensions
Citizen Verifiability
6.3% · 1/8Custody Hardware
12.5% · 1/8| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1Hardware tamper standardAre tamper-evident or tamper-responsive hardware standards mandated? | 0/50.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
| 2.2Network isolation mandateIs internet/Wi-Fi/cellular connectivity legally prohibited on vote-casting equipment? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
| 2.3Custody documentationIs full chain-of-custody documentation required and publicly available? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
| 2.4Tamper criminal penaltyAre there explicit criminal penalties for unauthorized device access? | 1/1100.0% | ΠΔ 26/2012 Άρθρο 118 codifies criminal penalty (≥1 year imprisonment + 2–5 years deprivation of office) for falsification of electoral lists, voter-ID tampering, or other electoral data alteration by public officials. Άρθρο 117 punishes voters; Άρθρο 119 criminalizes other electoral offenses. Strong tamper-penalty regime. “τιμωρείται με φυλάκιση τουλάχιστον ενός χρόνου” | § view source 2026-05-13 |
Post Election Audit
0.0% · 0/9| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1Mandatory auditIs a post-election audit legally required for every election? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Σύνταγμα Άρθρο 54 is meta-reference; no mandatory post-election audit regime in surfaced PD 26/2012 sections. | § view source 2026-05-13 |
| 3.2Audit methodWhat audit method is mandated? | 0/50.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Σύνταγμα Άρθρο 54 (meta). | § view source 2026-05-13 |
| 3.3Audit triggers beyond mandatoryDoes law trigger additional audits on close margins or sworn challenges? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Σύνταγμα Άρθρο 54 (meta). | § view source 2026-05-13 |
| 3.4Public observation of auditAre parties, media, and citizens granted observer access to the audit? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Σύνταγμα Άρθρο 54 (meta). | § view source 2026-05-13 |
| 3.5Binding forceAre audit results legally binding on the final certified result? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
Software Verifiability
0.0% · 0/9| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1Source code disclosureIs voting system source code legally accessible? | 0/50.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
| 1.2Reproducible builds requirementMust the binary that runs in production be reproducibly buildable from public source? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
| 1.3Pre-election binary commitmentIs the running binary cryptographically committed (hash published) before polls open? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
| 1.4Election definition publicationAre ballot contests, layouts, and tabulation rules signed and published before polls open? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
| 1.5Post-election integrity checkDoes law grant a right to verify the actual running binary matches the committed one? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
Transparency Observation
12.5% · 1/8| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.1Domestic observer rightsAre party and civil-society observers given full procedural access? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
| 6.2International observer accessAre OSCE/EU/IFES international observers admitted by default? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
| 6.3Precinct-level results publication speedAre precinct-level results legally required to be published within 24h of poll close? | 1/520.0% | ΠΔ 26/2012 Άρθρο 102 codifies election-annulment procedures with 1-month timeline for repeat voting following Άρθρο 100 Sύνταγμα ruling. Not a precinct-results-publication speed but contains general timing. | § view source 2026-05-13 |
| 6.4Public election event logIs a public, signed, append-only election event log legally required? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Sύνταγμα Άρθρο 54 (meta). | § view source 2026-05-13 |
Vendor Independence
0.0% · 0/4| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1Multi-vendor capabilityDoes law permit multiple certified vendors to operate in the same election? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
| 5.2Open protocol standardsAre vote-format / device-protocol standards open and publicly documented? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Σύνταγμα Άρθρο 54 (meta). | § view source 2026-05-13 |
| 5.3Contract duration capAre vendor contracts capped in duration, preventing perpetual lock-in? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Σύνταγμα Άρθρο 54 (meta). | § view source 2026-05-13 |
| 5.4Source-code escrowIs source-code escrow with the state required as a condition of certification? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-13 |
Voter Access
28.6% · 2/7| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.1Ballot secrecy guaranteeIs voter–ballot unlinkability legally guaranteed and enforceable? | 1/1100.0% | Sύνταγμα Άρθρο 51 § 3 establishes secret ballot constitutionally. ΠΔ 26/2012 Άρθρο 113 codifies criminal penalty (≤2 years imprisonment) for any attempt to learn how a voter voted. Άρθρο 83 codifies the operational procedure for voter secrecy (separate enclosed space, sealed envelope, judicial monogram). Comprehensive secrecy guarantee. “Όποιος με οποιοδήποτε τρόπο επιχειρεί ή πετυχαίνει να λάβει γνώση, είτε ο ίδιος, είτε τρίτος, τι ψήφισε ο εκλογέας τιμωρείται με φυλάκιση μέχρι δύο χρόνια” | § view source 2026-05-13 |
| 7.2Accessibility mandateAre accessibility standards (vision, motor, language) legally required at every polling place? | 0/50.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Sύνταγμα Άρθρο 54 (meta) — accessibility provisions (if any) likely in Law 4488/2017 (national accessibility regime), not ingested. | § view source 2026-05-13 |
| 7.3Polling-place density floorIs there a legal floor on polling places per N voters or per geographic area? | 1/1100.0% | ΠΔ 26/2012 Άρθρο 55 codifies a maximum-800-electors-per-polling-station rule — explicit polling-place density floor codified in statute. “Σε κάθε εκλογικό τμήμα ο αριθμός των εκλογέων δεν μπορεί να ξεπερνάει τους οκτακόσιους (800)” | § view source 2026-05-13 |