Michiganeadi-v0

EAdIElection Administration Index

How professionally and independently is election administration codified?

Administration20.6%4/17 · 15 datapoints · 5 dimensionsCompare across jurisdictions →

Dimensions

Accountability50.0%
1/2 · 2 datapoints
Commission0.0%
0/5 · 4 datapoints
Funding0.0%
0/4 · 3 datapoints
Staff Training50.0%
2/3 · 3 datapoints
Vendor Oversight33.3%
1/3 · 3 datapoints

Accountability

50.0% · 1/2
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
COI.1Conflict-of-interest disclosureAre commissioners and senior election staff required by statute to disclose financial interests (vendor relationships, party positions, candidate connections) publicly?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-05-12
COI.2Judicial review of administrative decisionsIs the right to seek judicial review of election-authority decisions codified, with standing, timeline, and venue defined?1/1100.0%

The section codifies judicial review with defined standing (aggrieved candidate who would have won but for error), venue (Michigan Supreme Court with original and exclusive jurisdiction), and timeline (48-hour filing deadline, ruling by day before electors convene).

§ view source
2026-05-12

Commission

0.0% · 0/5
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
COMM.1Statutory grounding of commissionIs the election commission's existence and core mandate set in the constitution (rather than statute alone, regulation, or executive order)?0/20.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section concerns penalties for obstructing election challengers; it does not address the existence or mandate of an election commission.

§ view source
2026-05-12
COMM.2Multi-branch appointmentAre commission members appointed by multiple branches (legislature, judiciary, executive) such that no single branch unilaterally controls composition?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Appointment is by the governor with senate confirmation — both are executive/legislative, but the judiciary is not involved. While there is partisan balance (2 from each major party) and legislative consent, this does not constitute multi-branch appointment in the sense of distributing nomination power across branches; the governor unilaterally nominates all four members.

§ view source
2026-05-12
COMM.3Term protectionAre commissioner terms defined in statute with fixed length, staggered cycles, and statutory grounds for removal?0/10.0%

Section lists grounds for vacancy (including removal for cause) on university/education boards, but does not define fixed term length or staggered cycles, and these are not election commissioner positions.

Death of the incumbent; his resignation; his removal from office for cause
§ view source
2026-05-12
COMM.4Political-balance requirementIs the commission's composition required by statute to be politically balanced (party-balanced, supermajority-confirmation, or independent appointment by judiciary)?0/10.0%

This section addresses vacancy-filling procedures but only references 'the political party entitled to fill the vacancy' without itself establishing the party-balance composition requirement. The actual balance requirement is in a different section, so this provision alone does not codify political balance.

§ view source
2026-05-12

Funding

0.0% · 0/4
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
FUND.1Independent funding lineIs the election authority's budget a separate statutory line item (not subject to mid-cycle reallocation by the executive branch alone)?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section governs how candidates may use public campaign financing funds, not the election authority's operational budget. It does not establish an independent funding line for the election administration body.

§ view source
2026-05-12
FUND.2Multi-year funding cycleAre election infrastructure budgets set on a multi-year cycle (avoiding annual political renegotiation of election-administration money)?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section establishes the state campaign fund (public financing for gubernatorial campaigns) with annual appropriation cycles ('appropriated annually from the general fund of this state ... each year in which a governor is elected'); does not establish multi-year budgeting for election administration.

§ view source
2026-05-12
FUND.3Foreign funding prohibitionIs foreign-source funding of the election authority (and election administration vendors, where applicable) prohibited by statute?0/20.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section governs separate segregated funds for political purposes (campaign-finance), not foreign-source funding of the election authority.

§ view source
2026-05-12

Staff Training

50.0% · 2/3
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
STAFF.1Career professional staffIs the election authority's career staff (professional employees, not political appointees) protected by civil-service or analogous merit-based statute?0.5/150.0%

Establishes the elections bureau under a director appointed under civil-service regulations; statute covers the director's appointment but does not in this section enumerate civil-service protection for the bureau's career professional staff (though Michigan Const. Art XI § 5 separately applies civil service to most state employees).

continues under the supervision of a director of elections, to be appointed by the secretary of state under civil service regulations
§ view source
2026-05-12
STAFF.2Mandatory trainingIs training for election officials and poll workers required by statute, with content and frequency defined?1/1100.0%

Mandates training schools conducted by the director of elections before each general November election (and other elections as advisable) for county/city/township clerks with content tied to conducting elections under election laws; subsections (2)-(4) extend to clerk-trainers and continuing-education courses.

shall conduct training schools throughout this state before the general November election, and before other elections as the director considers advisable, for county clerks and their representatives with respect to the conducting of elections in
§ view source
2026-05-12
STAFF.3Whistleblower protectionAre election-related whistleblower protections (for staff reporting irregularities) codified in statute?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in Michigan election or campaign-finance statute.

no FTS match
2026-05-12

Vendor Oversight

33.3% · 1/3
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
CERT.1Certification process codifiedIs the voting-equipment certification process (criteria, evaluators, timeline, public-comment period) codified in statute or regulation?1/1100.0%

The statute codifies the certification process: it designates the Board of State Canvassers as the evaluator, requires accreditation by an independent testing authority, mandates a field test, sets application fees, and provides for disapproval. Public-comment period is not specified, but criteria, evaluator, and procedure are codified.

§ view source
2026-05-12
CERT.2Recertification triggersAre recertification triggers (after material updates, after defects discovered, on a fixed schedule) codified?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses voter registration procedures (in-person, mail, online), not voting system vendor recertification triggers. It is unrelated to CERT.2.

§ view source
2026-05-12
CERT.3Decertification grounds & procedureAre the grounds for revoking certification, and the procedure for doing so, defined in statute?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section concerns prohibitions on public bodies using public resources for campaign contributions/expenditures and local ballot question communications. It has no relation to vendor certification or decertification grounds and procedures.

§ view source
2026-05-12

Other methodologies for Michigan