Alabamaeci-v0

ECIElection Campaign-Finance Index

How well is money in politics regulated and disclosed?

Finance27.8%5/18 · 15 datapoints · 5 dimensionsCompare across jurisdictions →

Dimensions

Contributions0.0%
0/3 · 3 datapoints
Disclosure60.0%
3/5 · 4 datapoints
Enforcement50.0%
2/4 · 3 datapoints
Foreign Source0.0%
0/4 · 3 datapoints
Traceability0.0%
0/2 · 2 datapoints

Contributions

0.0% · 0/3
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
CONT.1Contribution limit framework codifiedIf contribution limits exist, are they set by statute (not administrative discretion)? If no limits, is that absence explicit in statute?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-09
CONT.2Independent expenditure rulesAre independent-expenditure rules (third-party spending separate from candidate committees) codified in statute?0/10.0%

Section 17-5-2 provides definitions for key terms like 'contribution,' 'expenditure,' and 'electioneering communication,' but these are definitional provisions only. The section does not establish independent-expenditure rules (e.g., rules for political action committees, separate segregated funds, or third-party spending separate from candidate committees) or codify the procedures governing such spending. While the definitions reference political committees and PACs, actual independent-expenditure rules—such as coordination prohibitions, disclaimer requirements, or reporting procedures specific to independent spending—would be found in other sections of the chapter, not in this definitions section. For CONT.2 (independent-expenditure rules codified in statute), statutory grounding requires the operative rules themselves, not merely definitions.

§ view source
2026-06-09
CONT.3Anonymous-contribution treatmentAre anonymous contributions (cash below the threshold, etc.) addressed in statute with a defined disposition (returned, forfeited, etc.)?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-09

Disclosure

60.0% · 3/5
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
DISC.1Disclosure threshold in statuteIs the disclosure threshold (amount above which contributions must be reported) defined in statute, not regulation?1/1100.0%

The section explicitly defines the disclosure threshold in statutory text at § 17-5-8(d)(2): contributions aggregating more than $100 from any person must be reported, with full identification, amount, and date. This threshold is enumerated in the statute itself, not delegated to regulation or administrative discretion. The requirement is unambiguous and directly codified.

The identification of each person who has made contributions to the committee or candidate within the calendar year in an aggregate amount greater than one hundred dollars ($100), together with the amount and date of all the contributions
§ view source
2026-06-09
DISC.2Enumerated filing scheduleIs the filing schedule (pre-election, post-election, quarterly, etc.) enumerated in statute with specific deadlines?1/1100.0%

The statute explicitly enumerates multiple filing deadlines with precise temporal specifications: monthly reports by the second business day of the subsequent month (12 months before elections), weekly reports on Mondays for four weeks before elections, and daily reports on specific days preceding elections with a specific time (12:01 p.m.). Additionally, subsection (c) specifies annual reports due by January 31. These detailed, statutorily-grounded deadlines fully satisfy the requirement for an enumerated filing schedule.

§ view source
2026-06-09
DISC.3Disclosure of contributor identityDoes statute require contributor name, address, occupation, and employer be disclosed for contributions above the threshold?1/250.0%

The section requires disclosure of large contributions (≥$20,000) and cross-references Section 17-5-8 for the required disclosure fields. However, this section alone does not enumerate what 'the same information' includes; the statute requires reviewing the cross-referenced section to determine whether name, address, occupation, and employer are mandated. The procedural clarity is therefore incomplete within this section's four corners, though the statutory framework exists.

the principal campaign committee or political action committee shall file a report disclosing the receipt of any single contribution of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) or more. These reports shall disclose the same information required by Section 17-5-8
§ view source
2026-06-09
DISC.4Public access to filingsAre campaign-finance filings legally required to be publicly accessible online within a defined time of filing?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section concerns ballot statements and the Fair Ballot Commission's disclosure of statewide ballot measure information, not campaign-finance filings. Campaign-finance filings (candidate contributions, expenditures, in-kind donations, debts) are distinct from ballot-measure explanatory statements. The section does require posting ballot statements online within 60 days, but that is voter education, not campaign-finance disclosure. DISC.4 asks whether campaign-finance filings themselves are publicly accessible online within a defined time; this section addresses neither campaign-finance filings nor their online accessibility.

§ view source
2026-06-09

Enforcement

50.0% · 2/4
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
ENF.1Penalty schedule codifiedAre penalties for campaign-finance violations defined in statute with specified amounts (civil) and/or criminal grades?2/2100.0%

The statute codifies a criminal penalty for violation: conviction results in a Class C felony designation. While Alabama's separate statutes define the specific sentence range for a Class C felony, the crime classification itself is statutorily specified here, satisfying the requirement for a defined criminal grade. The section does not separately establish civil penalties, but criminal grading is present and codified.

Any person who intentionally receives or expends campaign funds in violation of subsection (a) shall be guilty, upon conviction, of a Class C felony.
§ view source
2026-06-09
ENF.2Enforcement body independenceIs the enforcement body (election commission, attorney general, campaign-finance regulator) appointed by multi-branch process and protected from in-cycle political control?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses electronic vote-counting equipment certification and testing procedures, not campaign-finance enforcement. It establishes a technical review committee's role in certifying voting systems but contains no provisions regarding the appointment structure, multi-branch process, or political insulation of any campaign-finance enforcement body. ENF.2 requires evaluation of an enforcement body's independence in campaign-finance administration; this section is entirely outside that domain.

§ view source
2026-06-09
ENF.3Private right of actionDoes statute provide a private right of action (citizen or party suit) for campaign-finance violations?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 17-5-7 establishes permissible uses and acceptable sources of campaign contributions, but contains no language authorizing private parties, citizens, or political parties to bring suit for violations of these rules. The section describes what candidates and committees may and may not do, but does not create a private right of action for enforcement. Procedural enforcement mechanisms are absent from this section.

§ view source
2026-06-09

Foreign Source

0.0% · 0/4
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
FOR.1Foreign-source prohibitionIs direct foreign contribution to a candidate or campaign committee prohibited by statute?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-09
FOR.2Indirect / pass-through foreign rulesAre indirect foreign-source channels (foreign nationals via domestic entities, foreign-controlled LLCs, etc.) addressed in statute?0/20.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-09
FOR.3Foreign-source verificationAre campaign committees required by statute to verify contributors are not foreign-source (vs. relying on contributor self-attestation alone)?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section is a political participation statute addressing the rights of government employees to engage in campaign activity and political expression, not a campaign-finance rule governing foreign-source verification. It contains no provisions requiring campaign committees to verify that contributors are non-foreign, nor does it establish any verification procedure or attestation mechanism. The statute is wholly outside the scope of FOR.3.

§ view source
2026-06-09

Traceability

0.0% · 0/2
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
TRACE.1Records-retention requirementAre campaign committees required by statute to retain records (contributor lists, expenditure documentation, bank statements) for a defined period?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-09
TRACE.2Audit accessAre campaign-committee records subject to mandatory audit (post-election random sample, threshold-triggered audit, or routine cycle) under statute?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 17-17-5 addresses improper use of state property and prohibits government employees from using state resources for political activity. It does not establish any campaign-committee audit framework, mandatory post-election audits, threshold-triggered audits, or routine audit cycles for campaign finances. The section addresses government-employee conduct restrictions and salary-deduction certifications for membership organizations, but contains no campaign-committee audit access or audit procedures.

§ view source
2026-06-09

Other methodologies for Alabama