EAdIElection Administration Index
How professionally and independently is election administration codified?
Dimensions
Accountability
0.0% · 0/2| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| COI.1Conflict-of-interest disclosureAre commissioners and senior election staff required by statute to disclose financial interests (vendor relationships, party positions, candidate connections) publicly? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-17 |
| COI.2Judicial review of administrative decisionsIs the right to seek judicial review of election-authority decisions codified, with standing, timeline, and venue defined? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Anayasa Article 79 establishes YSK with a FINALITY clause: 'Yüksek Seçim Kurulunun kararları aleyhine başka bir mercie başvurulamaz' (YSK decisions cannot be appealed to any other authority). Although Anayasa Article 125 (5247) opens judicial review for OTHER administrative acts, YSK acts are constitutionally exempted — a structural gap on judicial review of the election authority's decisions. | § view source 2026-05-17 |
Commission
40.0% · 2/5| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMM.1Statutory grounding of commissionIs the election commission's existence and core mandate set in the constitution (rather than statute alone, regulation, or executive order)? | 1/250.0% | Law 298 Article 10 codifies the 3-tier YSK hierarchy in STATUTE: 'In Ankara one Supreme Election Council, in each electoral district one provincial election board, in each district one district election board, and one ballot-box committee for each ballot box.' Note: full constitutional grounding exists in Anayasa Article 79 but was not surfaced by FTS for this datapoint — scoring at the statutory level. | § view source 2026-05-17 |
| COMM.2Multi-branch appointmentAre commission members appointed by multiple branches (legislature, judiciary, executive) such that no single branch unilaterally controls composition? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Anayasa Article 79 places elections under judicial-organ supervision. YSK is composed of 7 members elected by the Yargıtay (Court of Cassation) and Danıştay (Council of State) general assemblies — BOTH judicial bodies (same branch). Not multi-branch composition. Madde 41 of Law 2820 (5546) describes district-board mixed civil-servant + party-member composition but the supreme authority (YSK) is single-branch. | § view source 2026-05-17 |
| COMM.3Term protectionAre commissioner terms defined in statute with fixed length, staggered cycles, and statutory grounds for removal? | 1/1100.0% | Law 298 Article 18 codifies fixed statutory terms for district election boards: 'iki yılda bir ocak ayının son haftasında, bir başkan ile altı asıl ve altı yedek üyeden kurulur ve iki yıl süre ile görev yapar' — every 2 years in the last week of January, 1 chair + 6 main + 6 alternates, 2-year term. Reinforced by Madde 19 (party-member assignment rules) and Madde 23 (ballot-box-committee terms). | § view source 2026-05-17 |
| COMM.4Political-balance requirementIs the commission's composition required by statute to be politically balanced (party-balanced, supermajority-confirmation, or independent appointment by judiciary)? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: FTS candidates for COMM.4 surface ballot-paper preparation rules (Law 2972 Madde 18, Law 2839 Madde 26), propaganda rules (Law 6271 Madde 13, Law 298 Madde 55/B), and transitional provisions — none address commission political balance. (District boards include 2 party-members per Madde 19 of Law 298 but that wasn't surfaced here.) | § view source 2026-05-17 |
Funding
75.0% · 3/4| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| FUND.1Independent funding lineIs the election authority's budget a separate statutory line item (not subject to mid-cycle reallocation by the executive branch alone)? | 1/1100.0% | Law 298 Article 181 codifies a separate statutory line item: 'Yüksek Seçim Kurulu giderleri ile her türlü seçim işleri giderleri genel bütçeden ödenir. Bunun için gerekli ödenek Adalet Bakanlığı Bütçesi içindeki ayrı bir programda gösterilir' — YSK and all election-related expenses are paid from the general budget through a SEPARATE PROGRAM within the Ministry of Justice budget. | § view source 2026-05-17 |
| FUND.2Multi-year funding cycleAre election infrastructure budgets set on a multi-year cycle (avoiding annual political renegotiation of election-administration money)? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: FTS candidates surface party Treasury-subsidy provisions (Law 2820 Ek Madde 1), presidential term (Anayasa 101), AYM composition (Anayasa 146), district-board composition (Law 298 Madde 19), executive provisions — none codify a multi-year budget cycle for election administration. | § view source 2026-05-17 |
| FUND.3Foreign funding prohibitionIs foreign-source funding of the election authority (and election administration vendors, where applicable) prohibited by statute? | 2/2100.0% | Law 6271 Article 14(1) prohibits presidential candidates from accepting donations/aid from foreign states, international organizations, legal entities, and non-Turkish-national natural persons. Reinforced by Law 2820 Article 79 (party foreign-funding prohibition with strong national-sovereignty framing), Article 66 (state-sector source prohibition), Article 116 (6 months–1 year imprisonment for accepting prohibited donations). Comprehensive foreign-funding prohibition. | § view source 2026-05-17 |
Staff Training
0.0% · 0/3| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAFF.1Career professional staffIs the election authority's career staff (professional employees, not political appointees) protected by civil-service or analogous merit-based statute? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Law 298 Article 182 governs election-day worker compensation, not career professional-staff civil-service protections. Other candidates (Law 2820 Madde 41 district-board mixed composition, Madde 21 of Law 2839 candidate filing, Law 6271 Madde 11 candidates' civil-service resignation rule) do not codify election-authority staff merit protections. | § view source 2026-05-17 |
| STAFF.2Mandatory trainingIs training for election officials and poll workers required by statute, with content and frequency defined? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: FTS surfaces Anayasa 130 (university education), Law 298 Ek Madde 1 (YSK voter-education broadcasts via Turkish Radio), Madde 18 (district-board composition), Ek Madde 9 (electronic result transmission), Anayasa 174 (secular-reform laws) — none codify a statutory training mandate for election officials/poll workers. | § view source 2026-05-17 |
| STAFF.3Whistleblower protectionAre election-related whistleblower protections (for staff reporting irregularities) codified in statute? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Law 298 Article 82 governs ballot-box-area order maintenance, Article 132 covers YSK records-inquiry, Articles 130/166 cover challenge procedures — none codify whistleblower protection for staff reporting irregularities. | § view source 2026-05-17 |
Vendor Oversight
0.0% · 0/3| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| CERT.1Certification process codifiedIs the voting-equipment certification process (criteria, evaluators, timeline, public-comment period) codified in statute or regulation? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Turkey uses paper ballots only — no voting-equipment certification regime exists. Candidates surface ballot-box sealing (Madde 77), tamper penalties (Madde 164), overseas board duties (20/A), voter-ID requirements (Madde 87), counting procedure (Madde 100) — none are equipment certification. | § view source 2026-05-17 |
| CERT.2Recertification triggersAre recertification triggers (after material updates, after defects discovered, on a fixed schedule) codified? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-17 |
| CERT.3Decertification grounds & procedureAre the grounds for revoking certification, and the procedure for doing so, defined in statute? | 0/10.0% | No candidate sections returned by FTS. | no FTS match 2026-05-17 |