Turkeyeci-v0

ECIElection Campaign-Finance Index

How well is money in politics regulated and disclosed?

Finance55.6%10/18 · 15 datapoints · 5 dimensionsCompare across jurisdictions →

Dimensions

Contributions66.7%
2/3 · 3 datapoints
Disclosure40.0%
2/5 · 4 datapoints
Enforcement75.0%
3/4 · 3 datapoints
Foreign Source25.0%
1/4 · 3 datapoints
Traceability100.0%
2/2 · 2 datapoints

Contributions

66.7% · 2/3
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
CONT.1Contribution limit framework codifiedIf contribution limits exist, are they set by statute (not administrative discretion)? If no limits, is that absence explicit in statute?1/1100.0%

Law 6271 Article 14 and Law 2820 Articles 64–69 codify the contribution-limit framework in statute. Article 66 sets a statutory cap on individual donations per year (lira amount indexed annually). The framework is statutory, not regulation.

§ view source
2026-05-17
CONT.2Independent expenditure rulesAre independent-expenditure rules (third-party spending separate from candidate committees) codified in statute?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-17
CONT.3Anonymous-contribution treatmentAre anonymous contributions (cash below the threshold, etc.) addressed in statute with a defined disposition (returned, forfeited, etc.)?1/1100.0%

Law 2820 Article 61 enumerates the closed list of permissible party income sources (membership dues, donations, sale of materials, etc.) — anonymous contributions are implicitly excluded because all sources must fit an enumerated category. Reinforced by Article 69 (donations must be received via party-HQ-printed receipts with donor identification) — surfaced in FUND.3/2.4 contexts elsewhere.

§ view source
2026-05-17

Disclosure

40.0% · 2/5
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
DISC.1Disclosure threshold in statuteIs the disclosure threshold (amount above which contributions must be reported) defined in statute, not regulation?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: FTS-surfaced statutes (Law 6271 Article 14, Law 2820 Article 75, Anayasa Article 161, Law 2820 Ek Madde 7) do not codify a specific lira threshold above which contributions must be reported. Law 2820 Article 67 (not in FTS candidates here) sets the contribution cap but is itself the limit, not a 'reporting threshold' in the disclosure sense.

§ view source
2026-05-17
DISC.2Enumerated filing scheduleIs the filing schedule (pre-election, post-election, quarterly, etc.) enumerated in statute with specific deadlines?1/1100.0%

Law 2820 Article 74 codifies the audit/filing regime: 'Siyasi partilerin mali denetimi Anayasa Mahkemesince yapılır' — party financial audit is performed by the Constitutional Court. Reinforced by Article 73 (annual party budget submitted by end of October each year), Article 75 (AYM audits + Sayıştay assistance, parties provide annual final accounts).

§ view source
2026-05-17
DISC.3Disclosure of contributor identityDoes statute require contributor name, address, occupation, and employer be disclosed for contributions above the threshold?1/250.0%

Law 2820 Article 61 enumerates income sources; Article 69 (mentioned at v0 2.4 evidence) requires party-HQ-printed RECEIPTS for all donations, with donor identification. Article 66 prohibits anonymous large donations. Together they require contributor identification but DON'T mandate the full 'name + address + occupation + employer' enumeration of US-style disclosure. Partial.

§ view source
2026-05-17
DISC.4Public access to filingsAre campaign-finance filings legally required to be publicly accessible online within a defined time of filing?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: FTS-surfaced ECI candidates (Anayasa 174, Law 2820 Madde 124, Ek Madde 1/7) do not codify a specific public-access requirement with a defined time. Law 2820 Article 75 paragraph 5 (Resmî Gazete publication of AYM audit conclusions) is the actual basis but was not surfaced for DISC.4 by FTS.

§ view source
2026-05-17

Enforcement

75.0% · 3/4
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
ENF.1Penalty schedule codifiedAre penalties for campaign-finance violations defined in statute with specified amounts (civil) and/or criminal grades?2/2100.0%

Law 2820 Article 116 imposes 6 months–1 year imprisonment on both the donor AND the responsible party official for prohibited donations. Reinforced by Article 115 (administrative fines for failure to file Article-33 notification), Law 298 Madde 161/162 (ballot-box destruction 1–3 years), and Madde 154 (penalties for unauthorized candidate filings). Comprehensive criminal + civil penalty schedule.

§ view source
2026-05-17
ENF.2Enforcement body independenceIs the enforcement body (election commission, attorney general, campaign-finance regulator) appointed by multi-branch process and protected from in-cycle political control?1/1100.0%

Law 2820 Article 101 (and Articles 74–76, 88, 101 collectively) codify Anayasa Mahkemesi (Constitutional Court) as the enforcement body for party-finance violations and party-closure procedures. AYM members are appointed via the multi-source process in Anayasa Article 146 (TBMM 3 members, Cumhurbaşkanı 12 members from a list including Yargıtay/Danıştay/Sayıştay nominees, bar association nominee, etc.) — protected from in-cycle political control by 12-year non-renewable terms.

§ view source
2026-05-17
ENF.3Private right of actionDoes statute provide a private right of action (citizen or party suit) for campaign-finance violations?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: FTS surfaces Madde 176 of Law 298 (defamation-related private cause of action during campaigns) and Madde 110/55 of Law 2820 (party-closure procedures) — none codify a general PRIVATE right of action for citizens to sue over campaign-finance violations. Enforcement is via Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı (Public Prosecutor) and AYM only.

§ view source
2026-05-17

Foreign Source

25.0% · 1/4
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
FOR.1Foreign-source prohibitionIs direct foreign contribution to a candidate or campaign committee prohibited by statute?1/1100.0%

Law 6271 Article 14(1) explicitly prohibits presidential candidates from accepting donations from foreign states, international organizations, foreign legal entities, and non-Turkish-national natural persons. Reinforced by Law 2820 Articles 66 and 79.

§ view source
2026-05-17
FOR.2Indirect / pass-through foreign rulesAre indirect foreign-source channels (foreign nationals via domestic entities, foreign-controlled LLCs, etc.) addressed in statute?0/20.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: FTS surfaces Anayasa Articles 27 (academic freedom), 74 (right to petition), 174 (secular-reform laws), and Law 298 Madde 94/C (overseas voter procedure) — none codify anti-circumvention rules for indirect/pass-through foreign sources (foreign-controlled domestic entities, foreign nationals via shell companies, etc.).

§ view source
2026-05-17
FOR.3Foreign-source verificationAre campaign committees required by statute to verify contributors are not foreign-source (vs. relying on contributor self-attestation alone)?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-17

Traceability

100.0% · 2/2
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
TRACE.1Records-retention requirementAre campaign committees required by statute to retain records (contributor lists, expenditure documentation, bank statements) for a defined period?1/1100.0%

Law 2820 Article 60 requires party organs at every level to maintain multiple registers: member register (üye kayıt defteri), decisions book (karar defteri), incoming/outgoing correspondence register, income/expense register (gelir ve gider defteri), and fixed-assets register (demirbaş eşya defteri). Reinforced by Article 42 (member register subject to district board chair supervision).

§ view source
2026-05-17
TRACE.2Audit accessAre campaign-committee records subject to mandatory audit (post-election random sample, threshold-triggered audit, or routine cycle) under statute?1/1100.0%

Law 2820 Article 74 mandates AYM (Constitutional Court) audit of party finances with Sayıştay (Court of Accounts) assistance per Article 75. Comprehensive routine audit of all parties' final-accounts is statutorily required — not random sampling but full-coverage annual audit.

Siyasi partilerin mali denetimi Anayasa Mahkemesince yapılır.
§ view source
2026-05-17

Other methodologies for Turkey