ECIElection Campaign-Finance Index
How well is money in politics regulated and disclosed?
Dimensions
Contributions
100.0% · 3/3| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONT.1Contribution limit framework codifiedIf contribution limits exist, are they set by statute (not administrative discretion)? If no limits, is that absence explicit in statute? | 1/1100.0% | § 2 of the Law on Financing of Political Organisations (Parties) sets the donation framework in statute — parties may receive income only from enumerated sources, and a natural person's total gifts, membership and joining fees may not exceed 30 per cent of their previous-year income. “may not exceed 30 per cent of the income earned by such persons in the previous calendar year.” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| CONT.2Independent expenditure rulesAre independent-expenditure rules (third-party spending separate from candidate committees) codified in statute? | 1/1100.0% | Latvia codifies third-party (independent) campaigning — § 5 of the Pre-election Campaign Law defines the 'unrelated person' who may campaign separately from candidates and parties, capped at 15 minimum monthly wages, with notification and accounting duties to the Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau. “an unrelated person may use funds not exceeding 15 minimum monthly wages.” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| CONT.3Anonymous-contribution treatmentAre anonymous contributions (cash below the threshold, etc.) addressed in statute with a defined disposition (returned, forfeited, etc.)? | 1/1100.0% | § 7 of the Law on Financing of Political Organisations expressly prohibits anonymous gifts (donations) and codifies the disposition — an anonymous donation is transferred to the State budget within five days of receipt. “Financing of the political organisations (parties) in the form of anonymous gifts (donations) is prohibited.” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
Disclosure
80.0% · 4/5| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| DISC.1Disclosure threshold in statuteIs the disclosure threshold (amount above which contributions must be reported) defined in statute, not regulation? | 1/1100.0% | § 9 of the Law on Financing of Political Organisations requires the financial and economic activities of parties to be transparent and publicly available — a statutory disclosure regime applying to all party finance rather than above a threshold. “The financial and economic activities of political organisations (parties) shall be transparent and publicly available.” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| DISC.2Enumerated filing scheduleIs the filing schedule (pre-election, post-election, quarterly, etc.) enumerated in statute with specific deadlines? | 1/1100.0% | Latvia enumerates a multi-part filing schedule — the declaration of revenues and expenditures of elections within 30 days of election day (§ 8²), the annual statement, and pre-election-period declarations — all submitted to the Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau via the Electronic Data Input System (§ 15). “submit to the Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau the declaration of revenues and expenditures of elections and the annual statement” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| DISC.3Disclosure of contributor identityDoes statute require contributor name, address, occupation, and employer be disclosed for contributions above the threshold? | 1/250.0% | § 7 requires each donation to be recorded with the donor's given name, surname, personal identification number and place of residence — a donation lacking these is 'anonymous' and prohibited. Donors are fully identified by name and national ID; employer/occupation fields are not used. “the given name, surname, personal identification number and place of residence for the giver (donor)” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| DISC.4Public access to filingsAre campaign-finance filings legally required to be publicly accessible online within a defined time of filing? | 1/1100.0% | § 9(3) requires party-finance declarations and statements to be published in the official gazette Latvijas Vēstnesis and on the Internet within 10 days of submission — codified public online access. “shall be published in the official gazette Latvijas Vēstnesis and on the Internet” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
Enforcement
37.5% · 2/4| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENF.1Penalty schedule codifiedAre penalties for campaign-finance violations defined in statute with specified amounts (civil) and/or criminal grades? | 1/250.0% | § 35 of the Pre-election Campaign Law and § 39 of the Referendum Law (and §§ 16–17 of the Party Financing Law) codify a graduated administrative penalty schedule for campaign-finance violations — fines specified in units of fine; criminal election offences sit in the separate Criminal Law. “a warning or a fine from ten to one hundred units of fine shall be imposed on a natural person” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| ENF.2Enforcement body independenceIs the enforcement body (election commission, attorney general, campaign-finance regulator) appointed by multi-branch process and protected from in-cycle political control? | 0.5/150.0% | Latvia's campaign-finance enforcer is the Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau, whose independence is established in its own Law outside this corpus; the surfaced sections establish the independence of the election commissions (§ 2 of the Election Commissions Law) and the multi-branch-elected Central Election Commission. | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| ENF.3Private right of actionDoes statute provide a private right of action (citizen or party suit) for campaign-finance violations? | 0/10.0% | No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute. | no FTS match 2026-05-22 |
Foreign Source
75.0% · 3/4| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| FOR.1Foreign-source prohibitionIs direct foreign contribution to a candidate or campaign committee prohibited by statute? | 1/1100.0% | § 35 of the Referendum Law prohibits campaign funding obtained directly or indirectly from legal persons registered abroad and foreign citizens; the Law on Financing of Political Organisations limits party income to enumerated domestic sources, excluding foreign donors. “are directly or indirectly obtained from legal persons registered abroad and foreign citizens” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| FOR.2Indirect / pass-through foreign rulesAre indirect foreign-source channels (foreign nationals via domestic entities, foreign-controlled LLCs, etc.) addressed in statute? | 2/2100.0% | § 35(5) closes indirect channels — campaign funding may not be obtained directly or indirectly from foreign legal persons and citizens, nor through the intermediation of a third party; the third-party-conduit ban is defined in detail. “obtained with the intermediation of a third party” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| FOR.3Foreign-source verificationAre campaign committees required by statute to verify contributors are not foreign-source (vs. relying on contributor self-attestation alone)? | 0/10.0% | No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute. | no FTS match 2026-05-22 |
Traceability
75.0% · 2/2| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRACE.1Records-retention requirementAre campaign committees required by statute to retain records (contributor lists, expenditure documentation, bank statements) for a defined period? | 0.5/150.0% | § 27 of the Pre-election Campaign Law requires media and service providers to keep records of pre-election campaign expenditures, and the Party Financing Law requires parties to maintain accounting documents; record-keeping is statutorily required, though a specific retention period is not enumerated. “shall keep records of the pre-election campaign (pre-election expenditures)” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| TRACE.2Audit accessAre campaign-committee records subject to mandatory audit (post-election random sample, threshold-triggered audit, or routine cycle) under statute? | 1/1100.0% | § 11 of the Law on Financing of Political Organisations mandates an audit — a party whose fund turnover exceeds 10 minimum monthly wages must have its financial and economic activities audited by a sworn auditor, whose opinion is attached to the annual statement submitted to the CPCB. “financial and economic activities of such political organisation (party) for the relevant year shall be audited by a sworn auditor” | § view source 2026-05-22 |