ECIElection Campaign-Finance Index

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 35 of the PRC Village Organization Law addresses village affairs disclosure (村务公开) and financial transparency for village committees, but it does not establish a disclosure threshold for campaign contributions. The section mandates periodic publication of financial management, decisions, and matters of public interest, but contains no definition of a contribution-reporting threshold tied to any monetary amount. This statute governs village governance transparency, not campaign finance contribution disclosure.

No matching sections in corpus.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 35 of the PRC Village Organization Law addresses village administrative transparency and financial disclosure to villagers, but does not establish campaign-finance filing requirements or online public access to campaign disclosures. It mandates general village-affairs transparency (quarterly for routine matters, monthly for financial matters) and physical notice-board posting, but contains no mechanism for campaign-finance filings, no online-access requirement, and no defined timeline for digital publication. Campaign finance is distinct from general village administrative transparency, and this provision does not address the ECI criterion.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 35 addresses village-affairs disclosure (村务公开), a transparency mechanism for local village committees. It contains no provision establishing, defining, or protecting an independent enforcement body for campaign-finance regulation. The section mandates public disclosure of certain matters and specifies frequency and duration, but does not create or describe any enforcement authority, multi-branch appointment process, or political insulation for regulators. This is a transparency rule, not an enforcement-body governance rule.

No matching sections in corpus.

The statute explicitly and directly prohibits citizens participating in elections at all levels of People's Congresses from directly or indirectly accepting any form of support or assistance related to elections provided by foreign institutions, organizations, or individuals. The prohibition is unambiguously codified in statutory text with no delegation to administrative discretion. The section further specifies enforceable consequences: exclusion from candidate lists, removal if already listed, or invalidation of election if already elected.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This constitutional article addresses religious freedom and state protection of religious activities, with a provision that 'Religious groups and religious affairs shall not be subject to control by foreign forces.' However, this language does not constitute a campaign-finance rule or address indirect foreign-source channels for campaign contributions. The section contains no procedural framework for identifying, tracing, or regulating foreign-sourced funds through domestic entities, corporate ownership, or pass-through mechanisms—which is the substance of FOR.2. The criterion is entirely absent from this section.