EAdIElection Administration Index
How professionally and independently is election administration codified?
Dimensions
Accountability
0.0% · 0/2| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| COI.1Conflict-of-interest disclosureAre commissioners and senior election staff required by statute to disclose financial interests (vendor relationships, party positions, candidate connections) publicly? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: KRS 121.015 (campaign-finance definitions) is unrelated. No financial-interest / conflict-of-interest disclosure requirement for election commissioners or senior staff was surfaced. | § view source 2026-05-20 |
| COI.2Judicial review of administrative decisionsIs the right to seek judicial review of election-authority decisions codified, with standing, timeline, and venue defined? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The surfaced candidates concern writs and proclamations for special elections (KRS 118.720-118.770) and precinct-boundary maintenance, not a codified right of judicial review of election-authority decisions. Kentucky's judicial review of election disputes runs through the Circuit Court contest/recount provisions of KRS Chapter 120 (scored under EDRI). | § view source 2026-05-20 |
Commission
30.0% · 2/5| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMM.1Statutory grounding of commissionIs the election commission's existence and core mandate set in the constitution (rather than statute alone, regulation, or executive order)? | 0/20.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The State Board of Elections is established and mandated by statute — KRS 117.015 — not by the Kentucky Constitution. The FTS query surfaced precinct-boundary and offense-prosecution provisions rather than the establishing section, and the constitutional-grounding criterion is not met. | § view source 2026-05-20 |
| COMM.2Multi-branch appointmentAre commission members appointed by multiple branches (legislature, judiciary, executive) such that no single branch unilaterally controls composition? | 0/10.0% | KRS 117.015 establishes the State Board of Elections as an independent agency whose members are appointed by the Governor from lists submitted by the two major political parties' state central executive committees — a party-balanced appointment, but appointment by a single branch (the executive) rather than a multi-branch process. | § view source 2026-05-20 |
| COMM.3Term protectionAre commissioner terms defined in statute with fixed length, staggered cycles, and statutory grounds for removal? | 0.5/150.0% | KRS 117.015 codifies the composition and fixed membership of the State Board of Elections, and KRS 117.035 codifies the county board of elections with appointed members serving defined terms. Fixed terms are codified, but explicit cause-only removal protection for commission members is not clearly codified. | § view source 2026-05-20 |
| COMM.4Political-balance requirementIs the commission's composition required by statute to be politically balanced (party-balanced, supermajority-confirmation, or independent appointment by judiciary)? | 1/1100.0% | KRS 117.025 codifies a political-balance requirement: the State Board of Elections appoints an executive director and 'shall also appoint an assistant director, who shall be of a different political party than the director,' and must employ its staff 'on a bipartisan basis.' KRS 117.035 codifies the county board with two appointed members representing both parties, and KRS 117.015 seats the State Board from both parties' lists. Statutory party balance codified. “The board shall also appoint an assistant director, who shall be of a different political party than the director.” | § view source 2026-05-20 |
Funding
50.0% · 2/4| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| FUND.1Independent funding lineIs the election authority's budget a separate statutory line item (not subject to mid-cycle reallocation by the executive branch alone)? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The surfaced candidates concern political-party building funds, the income-tax party designation, and campaign-finance reporting — not the election authority's budget. No separate statutory funding line insulated from executive reallocation was surfaced. | § view source 2026-05-20 |
| FUND.2Multi-year funding cycleAre election infrastructure budgets set on a multi-year cycle (avoiding annual political renegotiation of election-administration money)? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: KRS 117.393 requires the State Board of Elections to submit a biennial report on the status of voting equipment and systems — a reporting cycle, not a multi-year election-infrastructure funding cycle. | § view source 2026-05-20 |
| FUND.3Foreign funding prohibitionIs foreign-source funding of the election authority (and election administration vendors, where applicable) prohibited by statute? | 2/2100.0% | Kentucky's 2022 foreign-money law codifies a foreign-funding prohibition: KRS 121.254 bars a foreign national from directly or indirectly making, soliciting, or directing a donation, contribution, or expenditure on a ballot measure; KRS 121.250 bars a political issues committee from knowingly receiving foreign-national funds and requires a no-foreign-funding certification; and KRS 121.252 requires donor affirmations, recordkeeping, and creates a presumption of violation. A comprehensive foreign-source funding prohibition is codified. | § view source 2026-05-20 |
Staff Training
33.3% · 1/3| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAFF.1Career professional staffIs the election authority's career staff (professional employees, not political appointees) protected by civil-service or analogous merit-based statute? | 0/10.0% | No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute. | no FTS match 2026-05-20 |
| STAFF.2Mandatory trainingIs training for election officials and poll workers required by statute, with content and frequency defined? | 1/1100.0% | KRS 117.187 codifies mandatory training: the State Board of Elections 'shall regularly provide special training regarding the election laws and methods of enforcement' to county boards of elections, county and Commonwealth's attorneys, and designated State Police, and the county board of elections must provide training (and compensation) for precinct election officers and certified challengers. Mandatory training is codified. | § view source 2026-05-20 |
| STAFF.3Whistleblower protectionAre election-related whistleblower protections (for staff reporting irregularities) codified in statute? | 0/10.0% | No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute. | no FTS match 2026-05-20 |
Vendor Oversight
33.3% · 1/3| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| CERT.1Certification process codifiedIs the voting-equipment certification process (criteria, evaluators, timeline, public-comment period) codified in statute or regulation? | 1/1100.0% | KRS 117.379 codifies the voting-system certification process: any person or corporation owning, manufacturing, or selling a voting system or e-poll book may request examination by the State Board of Elections on a $500 deposit and an accredited test report, and KRS 117.125 sets the detailed specifications a system must meet for approval. The criteria, the evaluator (State Board), and the examination procedure are codified. | § view source 2026-05-20 |
| CERT.2Recertification triggersAre recertification triggers (after material updates, after defects discovered, on a fixed schedule) codified? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The FTS query surfaced only KRS 116.048 (NVRA voter-registration agencies), which is unrelated to voting-system recertification. KRS 117.379 provides for 'reexamination' of an approved system, but no recertification-trigger provision was surfaced for this datapoint. | § view source 2026-05-20 |
| CERT.3Decertification grounds & procedureAre the grounds for revoking certification, and the procedure for doing so, defined in statute? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: The surfaced candidates concern certification of vote counts (KRS 117.275) and campaign-finance reporting exemptions (KRS 121.180), not the grounds or procedure for revoking a voting system's certification. | § view source 2026-05-20 |