South Dakotaeadi-v0

EAdIElection Administration Index

How professionally and independently is election administration codified?

Administration41.2%7/17 · 15 datapoints · 5 dimensionsCompare across jurisdictions →

Dimensions

Accountability100.0%
2/2 · 2 datapoints
Commission60.0%
3/5 · 4 datapoints
Funding0.0%
0/4 · 3 datapoints
Staff Training33.3%
1/3 · 3 datapoints
Vendor Oversight33.3%
1/3 · 3 datapoints

Accountability

100.0% · 2/2
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
COI.1Conflict-of-interest disclosureAre commissioners and senior election staff required by statute to disclose financial interests (vendor relationships, party positions, candidate connections) publicly?1/1100.0%

§ 12-25-29 codifies that convention nominees for state office must file statements of financial interest. § 12-25-29.1 codifies parallel for alternative-status parties. § 12-25-30 codifies parallel for candidates for local office. § 12-25-31.1 codifies judicial-officer PII exclusions. Comprehensive financial-interest disclosure framework codified.

§ view source
2026-05-19
COI.2Judicial review of administrative decisionsIs the right to seek judicial review of election-authority decisions codified, with standing, timeline, and venue defined?1/1100.0%

§ 12-21-50 codifies issuance of writ of certiorari for judicial review of recount decisions. § 12-21-49 codifies petition form and contents. § 12-21-51 codifies service. Comprehensive judicial review of administrative recount decisions codified.

§ view source
2026-05-19

Commission

60.0% · 3/5
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
COMM.1Statutory grounding of commissionIs the election commission's existence and core mandate set in the constitution (rather than statute alone, regulation, or executive order)?1/250.0%

§ 12-15-3 codifies distribution of precinct officials among parties (superintendent from majority party). § 12-18-23 codifies precinct-board ballot return procedure. § 12-15-1.3 codifies precinct assistant duties. § 12-1-5 (not in FTS top-5 for this datapoint) codifies the State Board of Elections. Commission structure codified but multi-tier statutory grounding is split across chapters.

§ view source
2026-05-19
COMM.2Multi-branch appointmentAre commission members appointed by multiple branches (legislature, judiciary, executive) such that no single branch unilaterally controls composition?0/10.0%

§ 12-15-3 codifies distribution of precinct officials among parties with superintendent from majority party. § 12-1-5 (not in FTS top-5 for this datapoint) codifies State Board appointment: SoS chair + Speaker-appointed county auditors (bipartisan) + 4 legislative-leader appointees (2 from each party). Multi-branch appointment framework codified through State Board structure, but FTS-surfaced section is narrower.

§ view source
2026-05-19
COMM.3Term protectionAre commissioner terms defined in statute with fixed length, staggered cycles, and statutory grounds for removal?1/1100.0%

§ 12-1-5 codifies State Board terms: 4-year terms for county-auditor members, staggered appointment dates for legislative-leader appointees ('the appointee of the democratic leader of the House of Representatives, 1980 and each fourth year thereafter…'). § 12-21-46 codifies court removal of recount board member 'not acting in good faith' — protected removal procedure. § 12-17B-1 codifies definitions. Term protection codified.

§ view source
2026-05-19
COMM.4Political-balance requirementIs the commission's composition required by statute to be politically balanced (party-balanced, supermajority-confirmation, or independent appointment by judiciary)?1/1100.0%

§ 12-18-3.1 codifies impartiality requirements for simulated-election polling-place access. § 12-15-3 (not in FTS top-5 for this datapoint) codifies bipartisan distribution of precinct officials with superintendent from majority party + deputy from minority. § 12-17B-11 codifies equal party representation among tabulation staff. § 12-20-48.1 codifies canvass-board procedures. Political-balance requirement codified.

§ view source
2026-05-19

Funding

0.0% · 0/4

Staff Training

33.3% · 1/3
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
STAFF.1Career professional staffIs the election authority's career staff (professional employees, not political appointees) protected by civil-service or analogous merit-based statute?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19
STAFF.2Mandatory trainingIs training for election officials and poll workers required by statute, with content and frequency defined?1/1100.0%

§ 12-17B-11 codifies equal party representation requirement with prior submission of proposed employee list to each county party chairperson at least 30 days prior to election, and oath-taking before discharging duties. State Board of Elections oversight for training under § 12-1-5 / § 12-17B-17. Staff oversight framework codified.

§ view source
2026-05-19
STAFF.3Whistleblower protectionAre election-related whistleblower protections (for staff reporting irregularities) codified in statute?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19

Vendor Oversight

33.3% · 1/3
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
CERT.1Certification process codifiedIs the voting-equipment certification process (criteria, evaluators, timeline, public-comment period) codified in statute or regulation?1/1100.0%

§ 12-17B-2 codifies State Board of Elections certification: 'Each system shall fulfill the requirements for election assistance commission standards certification and be approved by the State Board of Elections prior to distribution and use in this state.' § 12-17B-17 codifies rule-making. § 12-17B-3 codifies governing body adoption authority. § 12-17B-13 codifies tabulating procedure + canvass-board certification. Comprehensive certification framework codified.

§ view source
2026-05-19
CERT.2Recertification triggersAre recertification triggers (after material updates, after defects discovered, on a fixed schedule) codified?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19
CERT.3Decertification grounds & procedureAre the grounds for revoking certification, and the procedure for doing so, defined in statute?0/10.0%

No candidate sections returned by FTS.

no FTS match
2026-05-19

Other methodologies for South Dakota