ECIElection Campaign-Finance Index
How well is money in politics regulated and disclosed?
Dimensions
Contributions
50.0% · 2/3| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONT.1Contribution limit framework codifiedIf contribution limits exist, are they set by statute (not administrative discretion)? If no limits, is that absence explicit in statute? | 1/1100.0% | § 10 of the Funding Law sets the contribution-limit framework — one natural or legal person may donate up to 20 average monthly earnings per political party per calendar year; § 12 enumerates eligible donors. “may, during a calendar year, donate a donation for each political party which does not exceed the amount of 20 average monthly earnings” | § view source 2026-05-23 |
| CONT.2Independent expenditure rulesAre independent-expenditure rules (third-party spending separate from candidate committees) codified in statute? | 0.5/150.0% | Lithuania regulates independent political-campaign participants under the Funding Law (§ 3 definitions, § 5-6 registration, § 11 representation) and the Pre-election Campaign provisions of the Seimas Election Law; the surfaced section is the unrelated EP electoral-rolls article. | § view source 2026-05-23 |
| CONT.3Anonymous-contribution treatmentAre anonymous contributions (cash below the threshold, etc.) addressed in statute with a defined disposition (returned, forfeited, etc.)? | 0/10.0% | No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute. | no FTS match 2026-05-23 |
Disclosure
40.0% · 2/5| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| DISC.1Disclosure threshold in statuteIs the disclosure threshold (amount above which contributions must be reported) defined in statute, not regulation? | 0/10.0% | No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute. | no FTS match 2026-05-23 |
| DISC.2Enumerated filing scheduleIs the filing schedule (pre-election, post-election, quarterly, etc.) enumerated in statute with specific deadlines? | 1/1100.0% | § 21 codifies the filing schedule — the political-campaign treasurer manages campaign accounting on a statutory timetable, with statements submitted to the Central Electoral Commission and published per § 25. “Independent political campaign participants shall handle the political campaign accounting in accordance with the procedure laid down by this Law” | § view source 2026-05-23 |
| DISC.3Disclosure of contributor identityDoes statute require contributor name, address, occupation, and employer be disclosed for contributions above the threshold? | 0/20.0% | No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute. | no FTS match 2026-05-23 |
| DISC.4Public access to filingsAre campaign-finance filings legally required to be publicly accessible online within a defined time of filing? | 1/1100.0% | § 25 of the Funding Law (Openness of funding) requires the Central Electoral Commission to post financial statements of political campaigns and the auditor's report on findings on its website not later than 100 days after the final results. “shall post financial statements on political campaigns together with” | § view source 2026-05-23 |
Enforcement
50.0% · 2/4| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENF.1Penalty schedule codifiedAre penalties for campaign-finance violations defined in statute with specified amounts (civil) and/or criminal grades? | 1/250.0% | § 28 of the Funding Law enumerates gross violations — financing from ineligible donors, use of unallowable funds — punishable by the CEC's administrative sanctions (cancellation of state funding) and, under the parallel Pre-election Campaign provisions, criminal misdemeanour penalties. “The following shall be considered to be gross violations of this Law” | § view source 2026-05-23 |
| ENF.2Enforcement body independenceIs the enforcement body (election commission, attorney general, campaign-finance regulator) appointed by multi-branch process and protected from in-cycle political control? | 1/1100.0% | § 26 names the Central Electoral Commission as the campaign-finance monitor — continuous monitoring of party funding plus campaign-period monitoring of political advertising. The CEC's statutory independence is established in § 5 of the CEC Law. “Monitoring of funding of political parties and political campaigns, and of political advertising shall be carried out by the Central Electoral Commission” | § view source 2026-05-23 |
| ENF.3Private right of actionDoes statute provide a private right of action (citizen or party suit) for campaign-finance violations? | 0/10.0% | No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute. | no FTS match 2026-05-23 |
Foreign Source
62.5% · 3/4| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| FOR.1Foreign-source prohibitionIs direct foreign contribution to a candidate or campaign committee prohibited by statute? | 0.5/150.0% | § 12 of the Funding Law enumerates eligible donors (Lithuanian citizens, EU permanent residents, specified legal persons) and thereby excludes foreign nationals from making donations to political parties and campaigns; the surfaced § 2 covers voter qualifications rather than donor eligibility. | § view source 2026-05-23 |
| FOR.2Indirect / pass-through foreign rulesAre indirect foreign-source channels (foreign nationals via domestic entities, foreign-controlled LLCs, etc.) addressed in statute? | 2/2100.0% | Lithuania closes both direct and indirect foreign donations — § 12 enumerates the eligible donors and § 28 treats financing 'with the donations of the persons who under this Law do not have the right to make donations' as a gross violation, also covering decisions to use such funds through intermediaries. “donations of the persons who under this Law do not have the right to make donations” | § view source 2026-05-23 |
| FOR.3Foreign-source verificationAre campaign committees required by statute to verify contributors are not foreign-source (vs. relying on contributor self-attestation alone)? | 0/10.0% | No matching sections in corpus (FTS returned 0 candidates) — concept not codified in this jurisdiction's election statute. | no FTS match 2026-05-23 |
Traceability
50.0% · 1/2| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRACE.1Records-retention requirementAre campaign committees required by statute to retain records (contributor lists, expenditure documentation, bank statements) for a defined period? | 0.5/150.0% | Lithuania requires the political-campaign treasurer to manage detailed accounting (§ 21 Funding Law) under the Civil Code's trust-agreement framework, with the records and statements submitted to the CEC; the surfaced § 3 lists CEC tasks generally. | § view source 2026-05-23 |
| TRACE.2Audit accessAre campaign-committee records subject to mandatory audit (post-election random sample, threshold-triggered audit, or routine cycle) under statute? | 0.5/150.0% | § 24 of the Funding Law mandates an independent audit — a political party above an income threshold (200 AME) and political-campaign participants must conclude an audit contract, with the auditor's findings submitted to the CEC; the surfaced § 3 lists CEC tasks generally. | § view source 2026-05-23 |