ECIElection Campaign-Finance Index

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 60 addresses allocation of public expenditures for election administration (printing, publication, ballots) between the state treasury and municipalities. It contains no codification of independent-expenditure rules, third-party spending limits, or procedures governing non-candidate campaign spending. The section is purely administrative budgeting and does not engage with campaign-finance procedure for independent actors.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 61 addresses voter secrecy and the prohibition on demanding voting information from voters. It contains no provision defining a disclosure threshold for campaign contributions, nor does it establish any campaign-finance disclosure framework. The section is substantively unrelated to contribution-disclosure requirements.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 19 addresses candidate-nomination withdrawal procedures and deadlines, not campaign-finance disclosure filing schedules. The section specifies a single procedural deadline (withdrawal by 3 weeks before election) but contains no enumeration of disclosure filing schedules, reporting periods, or financial-information submission deadlines that DISC.2 requires. Campaign-finance disclosure procedures, if present in this statute, would be found in a different section.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 44 addresses polling procedures, ballot security, and voter identification during the voting process. It contains no provisions regarding campaign contributions, contributor disclosure, or financial reporting requirements. The criterion DISC.3 concerns the statutory requirement to disclose contributor identity (name, address, occupation, employer) for contributions above a threshold. This section is entirely outside the scope of campaign-finance disclosure rules.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses election administration procedures (polling-place organization, ballot preparation, election records) but contains no provisions regarding campaign-finance filings, public disclosure of contributions or expenditures, or online accessibility of campaign records. DISC.4 requires statutory grounding for public access to campaign-finance filings; this section does not address that topic.

The section establishes that violations of specified campaign provisions can result in fines (bøde) under Greenland's criminal law, providing a statutory basis for criminal penalties. However, the section does not enumerate specific fine amounts or criminal grades in this statute itself; it delegates the penalty schedule to the separate criminal code (kriminallov for Grønland). This creates a partial codification: the enforcement trigger is statutorily grounded, but the actual penalty amounts and grades are not enumerated in the election law itself.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 62 addresses conduct rules for election observers and polling-place officials (prohibiting interference with voters and breach of ballot secrecy), not the appointment, composition, or independence of an enforcement body. It contains no provisions regarding how an enforcement authority is constituted, whether it is multi-branch appointed, or how it is protected from political control. The section is procedurally clear within its scope but does not address the criterion's topic.

The statute explicitly grants any voter (vælger) and any candidate (kandidat) a private right to file written complaints (klage) regarding election validity with the relevant electoral board. This establishes a statutory basis for private parties to bring complaints challenging election conduct, which satisfies the criterion for a private right of action in the electoral context. Campaign-finance violations affecting election validity can be raised through this mechanism.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 2 addresses voter eligibility for Greenlandic citizens temporarily residing abroad, not campaign finance or foreign-source contributions. It contains no prohibition on foreign contributions, no definition of foreign sources, no enforcement mechanism, or any campaign-finance procedure whatsoever. This is electoral-procedure text unrelated to the criterion.

No matching sections in corpus.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 52 addresses only the procedural mechanics of reporting election results from polling places to the electoral board and the Electoral Committee (Valgnævnet). It contains no provisions regarding campaign contributions, contributor verification, foreign-source restrictions, or any campaign-finance procedure. This section concerns post-election result tabulation and reporting, not campaign finance regulation.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: § 44 addresses voting procedures and ballot administration (voter identification, ballot casting, ballot security). It contains no provisions regarding campaign committee record-retention requirements, contributor lists, expenditure documentation, or banking records. This section falls entirely outside the domain of campaign finance regulation.

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Section 52 concerns election-day vote counting, reporting of polling-station results to the electoral commission, and procedural determination by the electoral board—standard election administration. It contains no reference to campaign-committee records, audit procedures, post-election audits, or any mechanism for access to campaign finance documentation. This section does not address the criterion's subject matter.