Compare jurisdictions
Head-to-head methodology and dimension scores. Pick up to all 6 jurisdictions from the chips below.
Selected
EstoniaeeMontanaus-mtFloridaus-flKentuckyus-kyTexasus-txNew Yorkus-nyConnecticutus-ctGeorgiaus-gaOhious-ohCaliforniaus-caNorth Dakotaus-ndWashingtonus-waColoradous-coSouth Dakotaus-sdSwedenseNorwaynoVirginiaus-vaMinnesotaus-mnWest Virginiaus-wvDenmarkdkAlabamaus-alMarylandus-mdLatvialvNew Mexicous-nmIndianaus-inPennsylvaniaus-paArkansasus-arTennesseeus-tnIllinoisus-ilFinlandfiLouisianaus-laRhode Islandus-riSouth Carolinaus-scWisconsinus-wiArizonaus-azDelawareus-deIowaus-iaMichiganus-miAlaskaus-akNew Hampshireus-nhNebraskaus-neMexicomxLithuanialtVermontus-vtNevadaus-nvUtahus-utOregonus-orKansasus-ksMissourius-moTurkeytrNorth Carolinaus-ncMassachusettsus-maMaineus-meIdahous-idMoldovamdRussiaruCanadacaUnited StatesusOklahomaus-okGermanydeUkraineuaAustraliaauAustriaatSerbiasrArgentinaarNetherlandsnlFrancefrBulgariabgSpainesPortugalptPolandplHawaiius-hiGreecegrIcelandisWyomingus-wyMississippius-msUnited KingdomgbRomaniaroMaltamtIrelandieArmeniaamNew Jerseyus-njBrazilbrCroatiahrBelgiumbeMadagascarmgGeorgiageLuxembourgluGreenlandglKazakhstankzBelarusbyCzechiaczSouth AfricazaChinacnNorth Koreakp
Methodology Radar (overlay)
Overall
| Methodology | us-fl | gr | ca | by | be | ro | kp | us-ms | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting method | Paper + scan | Paper only | Paper only | Paper only | Mixed | Paper only | Paper only | Paper + scan | Paper only |
| Overall | 56.0% | 26.3% | 32.3% | 18.8% | 22.6% | 24.8% | 4.3% | 25.2% | 29.6% |
| EAdI Election Administration Index | 50.0% | 14.7% | 26.5% | 14.7% | 8.8% | 14.7% | 18.2% | 11.8% | 14.7% |
| EAI Electoral Access Index | 85.7% | 46.4% | 39.3% | 30.4% | 37.5% | 53.6% | 4.0% | 39.3% | 42.9% |
| ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index | 69.4% | 55.6% | 44.4% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 8.3% | — | 27.8% | 58.3% |
| EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index | 36.4% | 27.3% | 81.8% | 4.5% | 31.8% | 40.9% | 0.0% | 36.4% | 62.7% |
| EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index | 91.7% | 33.3% | 23.3% | 25.0% | 58.3% | 41.7% | — | 25.0% | 8.3% |
| EII Election Integrity Index | 37.7% | 8.5% | 17.0% | 18.9% | 17.0% | 13.2% | 1.9% | 18.9% | 13.2% |
Dimensions (per methodology)
EAdI Election Administration Index
| Dimension | us-fl | gr | ca | by | be | ro | kp | us-ms | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accountability | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| Commission | 80% | 30% | 60% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 40% | 0% | 20% |
| Funding | 50% | 25% | 13% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Staff Training | 33% | 0% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 50% | — | 33% | 0% |
| Vendor Oversight | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
EAI Electoral Access Index
| Dimension | us-fl | gr | ca | by | be | ro | kp | us-ms | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration | 100% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Eligibility | 80% | 20% | 0% | 40% | 40% | 60% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| Identification | 90% | 40% | 80% | 20% | 40% | 70% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
| Registration | 93% | 79% | 43% | 29% | 50% | 57% | 0% | 57% | 57% |
| Roll Integrity | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Voter Assistance | 100% | 33% | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| Voting Methods | 67% | 42% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index
| Dimension | us-fl | gr | ca | by | be | ro | kp | us-ms | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributions | 67% | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | — | 67% | 17% |
| Disclosure | 70% | 60% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | — | 40% | 70% |
| Enforcement | 100% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 50% | 38% | — | 25% | 63% |
| Foreign Source | 25% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | — | 0% | 75% |
| Traceability | 100% | 100% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | — | 0% | 50% |
EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index
| Dimension | us-fl | gr | ca | by | be | ro | kp | us-ms | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contest | 0% | 40% | 80% | 0% | 50% | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| Recount | 50% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 13% | 0% | — | 0% | 60% |
| Timing | 100% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 75% | — | 100% | 25% |
EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index
| Dimension | us-fl | gr | ca | by | be | ro | kp | us-ms | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballot Info | 100% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 50% | — | 0% | 0% |
| Candidate | 75% | 25% | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% | — | 25% | 0% |
| Notification | 100% | 50% | 70% | 50% | 50% | 25% | — | 50% | 25% |
EII Election Integrity Index
| Dimension | us-fl | gr | ca | by | be | ro | kp | us-ms | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citizen Verifiability | 13% | 6% | 13% | 6% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 13% | 0% |
| Custody Hardware | 19% | 13% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 38% | 38% |
| Post Election Audit | 61% | 0% | 22% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 22% | 11% |
| Software Verifiability | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Transparency Observation | 50% | 13% | 0% | 19% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Vendor Independence | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Voter Access | 100% | 29% | 57% | 29% | 43% | 57% | 14% | 57% | 43% |
Phase 3 will replace these dense tables with overlaid radar charts and a datapoint heatmap.