Compare jurisdictions
Head-to-head methodology and dimension scores. Pick up to all 6 jurisdictions from the chips below.
Selected
EstoniaeeMontanaus-mtFloridaus-flKentuckyus-kyTexasus-txNew Yorkus-nyConnecticutus-ctGeorgiaus-gaOhious-ohCaliforniaus-caNorth Dakotaus-ndWashingtonus-waColoradous-coSouth Dakotaus-sdSwedenseNorwaynoVirginiaus-vaMinnesotaus-mnWest Virginiaus-wvDenmarkdkAlabamaus-alMarylandus-mdLatvialvNew Mexicous-nmIndianaus-inPennsylvaniaus-paArkansasus-arTennesseeus-tnIllinoisus-ilFinlandfiLouisianaus-laRhode Islandus-riSouth Carolinaus-scWisconsinus-wiArizonaus-azDelawareus-deIowaus-iaMichiganus-miAlaskaus-akNew Hampshireus-nhNebraskaus-neMexicomxLithuanialtVermontus-vtNevadaus-nvUtahus-utOregonus-orKansasus-ksMissourius-moTurkeytrNorth Carolinaus-ncMassachusettsus-maMaineus-meIdahous-idMoldovamdRussiaruCanadacaUnited StatesusOklahomaus-okGermanydeUkraineuaAustraliaauAustriaatSerbiasrArgentinaarNetherlandsnlFrancefrBulgariabgSpainesPortugalptPolandplHawaiius-hiGreecegrIcelandisWyomingus-wyMississippius-msUnited KingdomgbRomaniaroMaltamtIrelandieArmeniaamNew Jerseyus-njBrazilbrCroatiahrBelgiumbeMadagascarmgGeorgiageLuxembourgluGreenlandglKazakhstankzBelarusbyCzechiaczSouth AfricazaChinacnNorth Koreakp
Methodology Radar (overlay)
Overall
| Methodology | us-mt | ca | kp | us-mo | tr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting method | Paper + scan | Paper only | Paper only | Paper + scan | Paper only |
| Overall | 59.0% | 32.3% | 4.3% | 35.0% | 34.2% |
| EAdI Election Administration Index | 50.0% | 26.5% | 18.2% | 23.5% | 29.4% |
| EAI Electoral Access Index | 66.1% | 39.3% | 4.0% | 46.4% | 44.6% |
| ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index | 88.9% | 44.4% | — | 50.0% | 55.6% |
| EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index | 81.8% | 81.8% | 0.0% | 54.5% | 27.3% |
| EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index | 50.0% | 23.3% | — | 41.7% | 66.7% |
| EII Election Integrity Index | 44.3% | 17.0% | 1.9% | 22.6% | 20.8% |
Dimensions (per methodology)
EAdI Election Administration Index
| Dimension | us-mt | ca | kp | us-mo | tr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accountability | 50% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| Commission | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| Funding | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 75% |
| Staff Training | 33% | 33% | — | 33% | 0% |
| Vendor Oversight | 83% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 0% |
EAI Electoral Access Index
| Dimension | us-mt | ca | kp | us-mo | tr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration | 50% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| Eligibility | 60% | 0% | 20% | 40% | 70% |
| Identification | 60% | 80% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| Registration | 79% | 43% | 0% | 57% | 57% |
| Roll Integrity | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Voter Assistance | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Voting Methods | 83% | 33% | 0% | 33% | 17% |
ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index
| Dimension | us-mt | ca | kp | us-mo | tr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributions | 100% | 67% | — | 67% | 67% |
| Disclosure | 90% | 50% | — | 80% | 40% |
| Enforcement | 88% | 25% | — | 25% | 75% |
| Foreign Source | 100% | 50% | — | 50% | 25% |
| Traceability | 50% | 25% | — | 0% | 100% |
EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index
| Dimension | us-mt | ca | kp | us-mo | tr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contest | 100% | 80% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| Recount | 88% | 100% | — | 38% | 0% |
| Timing | 25% | 50% | — | 75% | 50% |
EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index
| Dimension | us-mt | ca | kp | us-mo | tr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballot Info | 50% | 0% | — | 50% | 50% |
| Candidate | 25% | 0% | — | 0% | 100% |
| Notification | 75% | 70% | — | 75% | 50% |
EII Election Integrity Index
| Dimension | us-mt | ca | kp | us-mo | tr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citizen Verifiability | 31% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
| Custody Hardware | 56% | 25% | 0% | 38% | 50% |
| Post Election Audit | 50% | 22% | 0% | 22% | 0% |
| Software Verifiability | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Transparency Observation | 38% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 13% |
| Vendor Independence | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Voter Access | 100% | 57% | 14% | 86% | 71% |
Phase 3 will replace these dense tables with overlaid radar charts and a datapoint heatmap.