Compare jurisdictions
Head-to-head methodology and dimension scores. Pick up to all 6 jurisdictions from the chips below.
Selected
EstoniaeeMontanaus-mtFloridaus-flKentuckyus-kyTexasus-txNew Yorkus-nyConnecticutus-ctGeorgiaus-gaOhious-ohCaliforniaus-caNorth Dakotaus-ndWashingtonus-waColoradous-coSouth Dakotaus-sdSwedenseNorwaynoVirginiaus-vaMinnesotaus-mnWest Virginiaus-wvDenmarkdkAlabamaus-alMarylandus-mdLatvialvNew Mexicous-nmIndianaus-inPennsylvaniaus-paArkansasus-arTennesseeus-tnIllinoisus-ilFinlandfiLouisianaus-laRhode Islandus-riSouth Carolinaus-scWisconsinus-wiArizonaus-azDelawareus-deIowaus-iaMichiganus-miAlaskaus-akNew Hampshireus-nhNebraskaus-neMexicomxLithuanialtVermontus-vtNevadaus-nvUtahus-utOregonus-orKansasus-ksMissourius-moTurkeytrNorth Carolinaus-ncMassachusettsus-maMaineus-meIdahous-idMoldovamdRussiaruCanadacaUnited StatesusOklahomaus-okGermanydeUkraineuaAustraliaauAustriaatSerbiasrArgentinaarNetherlandsnlFrancefrBulgariabgSpainesPortugalptPolandplHawaiius-hiGreecegrIcelandisWyomingus-wyMississippius-msUnited KingdomgbRomaniaroMaltamtIrelandieArmeniaamNew Jerseyus-njBrazilbrCroatiahrBelgiumbeMadagascarmgGeorgiageLuxembourgluGreenlandglKazakhstankzBelarusbyCzechiaczSouth AfricazaChinacnNorth Koreakp
Methodology Radar (overlay)
Overall
| Methodology | us-me | us-ny |
|---|---|---|
| Voting method | Paper + scan | Paper + scan |
| Overall | 33.2% | 51.5% |
| EAdI Election Administration Index | 23.5% | 52.9% |
| EAI Electoral Access Index | 29.6% | 67.9% |
| ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index | 63.9% | 61.1% |
| EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index | 31.8% | 45.5% |
| EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index | 30.0% | 100.0% |
| EII Election Integrity Index | 28.3% | 34.9% |
Dimensions (per methodology)
EAdI Election Administration Index
| Dimension | us-me | us-ny |
|---|---|---|
| Accountability | 50% | 50% |
| Commission | 40% | 100% |
| Funding | 0% | 25% |
| Staff Training | 33% | 33% |
| Vendor Oversight | 0% | 33% |
EAI Electoral Access Index
| Dimension | us-me | us-ny |
|---|---|---|
| Administration | 0% | 0% |
| Eligibility | 0% | 50% |
| Identification | 0% | 40% |
| Registration | 71% | 100% |
| Roll Integrity | 0% | 50% |
| Voter Assistance | 67% | 67% |
| Voting Methods | 20% | 83% |
ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index
| Dimension | us-me | us-ny |
|---|---|---|
| Contributions | 50% | 100% |
| Disclosure | 80% | 70% |
| Enforcement | 50% | 88% |
| Foreign Source | 75% | 13% |
| Traceability | 50% | 25% |
EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index
| Dimension | us-me | us-ny |
|---|---|---|
| Contest | 0% | 30% |
| Recount | 50% | 50% |
| Timing | 75% | 75% |
EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index
| Dimension | us-me | us-ny |
|---|---|---|
| Ballot Info | 15% | 100% |
| Candidate | 50% | 100% |
| Notification | 25% | 100% |
EII Election Integrity Index
| Dimension | us-me | us-ny |
|---|---|---|
| Citizen Verifiability | 0% | 25% |
| Custody Hardware | 63% | 44% |
| Post Election Audit | 56% | 56% |
| Software Verifiability | 0% | 6% |
| Transparency Observation | 38% | 38% |
| Vendor Independence | 0% | 25% |
| Voter Access | 29% | 50% |
Phase 3 will replace these dense tables with overlaid radar charts and a datapoint heatmap.