Compare jurisdictions
Head-to-head methodology and dimension scores. Pick up to all 6 jurisdictions from the chips below.
Selected
EstoniaeeMontanaus-mtFloridaus-flKentuckyus-kyTexasus-txNew Yorkus-nyConnecticutus-ctGeorgiaus-gaOhious-ohCaliforniaus-caNorth Dakotaus-ndWashingtonus-waColoradous-coSouth Dakotaus-sdSwedenseNorwaynoVirginiaus-vaMinnesotaus-mnWest Virginiaus-wvDenmarkdkAlabamaus-alMarylandus-mdLatvialvNew Mexicous-nmIndianaus-inPennsylvaniaus-paArkansasus-arTennesseeus-tnIllinoisus-ilFinlandfiLouisianaus-laRhode Islandus-riSouth Carolinaus-scWisconsinus-wiArizonaus-azDelawareus-deIowaus-iaMichiganus-miAlaskaus-akNew Hampshireus-nhNebraskaus-neMexicomxLithuanialtVermontus-vtNevadaus-nvUtahus-utOregonus-orKansasus-ksMissourius-moTurkeytrNorth Carolinaus-ncMassachusettsus-maMaineus-meIdahous-idMoldovamdRussiaruCanadacaUnited StatesusOklahomaus-okGermanydeUkraineuaAustraliaauAustriaatSerbiasrArgentinaarNetherlandsnlFrancefrBulgariabgSpainesPortugalptPolandplHawaiius-hiGreecegrIcelandisWyomingus-wyMississippius-msUnited KingdomgbRomaniaroMaltamtIrelandieArmeniaamNew Jerseyus-njBrazilbrCroatiahrBelgiumbeMadagascarmgGeorgiageLuxembourgluGreenlandglKazakhstankzBelarusbyCzechiaczSouth AfricazaChinacnNorth Koreakp
Methodology Radar (overlay)
Overall
| Methodology | us-il | us-ks |
|---|---|---|
| Voting method | Paper + scan | Paper + scan |
| Overall | 38.7% | 35.0% |
| EAdI Election Administration Index | 38.2% | 23.5% |
| EAI Electoral Access Index | 60.7% | 44.6% |
| ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index | 38.9% | 61.1% |
| EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index | 54.5% | 36.4% |
| EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index | 25.0% | 50.0% |
| EII Election Integrity Index | 25.5% | 22.6% |
Dimensions (per methodology)
EAdI Election Administration Index
| Dimension | us-il | us-ks |
|---|---|---|
| Accountability | 50% | 25% |
| Commission | 60% | 40% |
| Funding | 0% | 0% |
| Staff Training | 50% | 33% |
| Vendor Oversight | 33% | 17% |
EAI Electoral Access Index
| Dimension | us-il | us-ks |
|---|---|---|
| Administration | 50% | 50% |
| Eligibility | 60% | 20% |
| Identification | 40% | 60% |
| Registration | 79% | 43% |
| Roll Integrity | 100% | 0% |
| Voter Assistance | 67% | 33% |
| Voting Methods | 50% | 67% |
ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index
| Dimension | us-il | us-ks |
|---|---|---|
| Contributions | 83% | 83% |
| Disclosure | 40% | 40% |
| Enforcement | 38% | 50% |
| Foreign Source | 25% | 88% |
| Traceability | 0% | 50% |
EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index
| Dimension | us-il | us-ks |
|---|---|---|
| Contest | 60% | 0% |
| Recount | 50% | 75% |
| Timing | 50% | 50% |
EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index
| Dimension | us-il | us-ks |
|---|---|---|
| Ballot Info | 0% | 25% |
| Candidate | 25% | 25% |
| Notification | 50% | 100% |
EII Election Integrity Index
| Dimension | us-il | us-ks |
|---|---|---|
| Citizen Verifiability | 19% | 13% |
| Custody Hardware | 31% | 50% |
| Post Election Audit | 17% | 44% |
| Software Verifiability | 17% | 0% |
| Transparency Observation | 31% | 13% |
| Vendor Independence | 50% | 0% |
| Voter Access | 29% | 29% |
Phase 3 will replace these dense tables with overlaid radar charts and a datapoint heatmap.