Compare jurisdictions
Head-to-head methodology and dimension scores. Pick up to all 6 jurisdictions from the chips below.
Selected
EstoniaeeMontanaus-mtFloridaus-flKentuckyus-kyTexasus-txNew Yorkus-nyConnecticutus-ctGeorgiaus-gaOhious-ohCaliforniaus-caNorth Dakotaus-ndWashingtonus-waColoradous-coSouth Dakotaus-sdSwedenseNorwaynoVirginiaus-vaMinnesotaus-mnWest Virginiaus-wvDenmarkdkAlabamaus-alMarylandus-mdLatvialvNew Mexicous-nmIndianaus-inPennsylvaniaus-paArkansasus-arTennesseeus-tnIllinoisus-ilFinlandfiLouisianaus-laRhode Islandus-riSouth Carolinaus-scWisconsinus-wiArizonaus-azDelawareus-deIowaus-iaMichiganus-miAlaskaus-akNew Hampshireus-nhNebraskaus-neMexicomxLithuanialtVermontus-vtNevadaus-nvUtahus-utOregonus-orKansasus-ksMissourius-moTurkeytrNorth Carolinaus-ncMassachusettsus-maMaineus-meIdahous-idMoldovamdRussiaruCanadacaUnited StatesusOklahomaus-okGermanydeUkraineuaAustraliaauAustriaatSerbiasrArgentinaarNetherlandsnlFrancefrBulgariabgSpainesPortugalptPolandplHawaiius-hiGreecegrIcelandisWyomingus-wyMississippius-msUnited KingdomgbRomaniaroMaltamtIrelandieArmeniaamNew Jerseyus-njBrazilbrCroatiahrBelgiumbeMadagascarmgGeorgiageLuxembourgluGreenlandglKazakhstankzBelarusbyCzechiaczSouth AfricazaChinacnNorth Koreakp
Methodology Radar (overlay)
Overall
| Methodology | us-tn | us-mt |
|---|---|---|
| Voting method | Paper + scan | Paper + scan |
| Overall | 39.1% | 59.0% |
| EAdI Election Administration Index | 23.5% | 50.0% |
| EAI Electoral Access Index | 55.4% | 66.1% |
| ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index | 44.4% | 88.9% |
| EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index | 31.8% | 81.8% |
| EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| EII Election Integrity Index | 34.0% | 44.3% |
Dimensions (per methodology)
EAdI Election Administration Index
| Dimension | us-tn | us-mt |
|---|---|---|
| Accountability | 0% | 50% |
| Commission | 20% | 60% |
| Funding | 0% | 25% |
| Staff Training | 33% | 33% |
| Vendor Oversight | 67% | 83% |
EAI Electoral Access Index
| Dimension | us-tn | us-mt |
|---|---|---|
| Administration | 50% | 50% |
| Eligibility | 40% | 60% |
| Identification | 40% | 60% |
| Registration | 71% | 79% |
| Roll Integrity | 0% | 50% |
| Voter Assistance | 67% | 33% |
| Voting Methods | 67% | 83% |
ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index
| Dimension | us-tn | us-mt |
|---|---|---|
| Contributions | 33% | 100% |
| Disclosure | 60% | 90% |
| Enforcement | 50% | 88% |
| Foreign Source | 0% | 100% |
| Traceability | 100% | 50% |
EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index
| Dimension | us-tn | us-mt |
|---|---|---|
| Contest | 60% | 100% |
| Recount | 13% | 88% |
| Timing | 0% | 25% |
EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index
| Dimension | us-tn | us-mt |
|---|---|---|
| Ballot Info | 25% | 50% |
| Candidate | 50% | 25% |
| Notification | 75% | 75% |
EII Election Integrity Index
| Dimension | us-tn | us-mt |
|---|---|---|
| Citizen Verifiability | 13% | 31% |
| Custody Hardware | 50% | 56% |
| Post Election Audit | 44% | 50% |
| Software Verifiability | 22% | 11% |
| Transparency Observation | 13% | 38% |
| Vendor Independence | 50% | 25% |
| Voter Access | 57% | 100% |
Phase 3 will replace these dense tables with overlaid radar charts and a datapoint heatmap.