Compare jurisdictions
Head-to-head methodology and dimension scores. Pick up to all 6 jurisdictions from the chips below.
Selected
EstoniaeeMontanaus-mtFloridaus-flKentuckyus-kyTexasus-txNew Yorkus-nyConnecticutus-ctGeorgiaus-gaOhious-ohCaliforniaus-caNorth Dakotaus-ndWashingtonus-waColoradous-coSouth Dakotaus-sdSwedenseNorwaynoVirginiaus-vaMinnesotaus-mnWest Virginiaus-wvDenmarkdkAlabamaus-alMarylandus-mdLatvialvNew Mexicous-nmIndianaus-inPennsylvaniaus-paArkansasus-arTennesseeus-tnIllinoisus-ilFinlandfiLouisianaus-laRhode Islandus-riSouth Carolinaus-scWisconsinus-wiArizonaus-azDelawareus-deIowaus-iaMichiganus-miAlaskaus-akNew Hampshireus-nhNebraskaus-neMexicomxLithuanialtVermontus-vtNevadaus-nvUtahus-utOregonus-orKansasus-ksMissourius-moTurkeytrNorth Carolinaus-ncMassachusettsus-maMaineus-meIdahous-idMoldovamdRussiaruCanadacaUnited StatesusOklahomaus-okGermanydeUkraineuaAustraliaauAustriaatSerbiasrArgentinaarNetherlandsnlFrancefrBulgariabgSpainesPortugalptPolandplHawaiius-hiGreecegrIcelandisWyomingus-wyMississippius-msUnited KingdomgbRomaniaroMaltamtIrelandieArmeniaamNew Jerseyus-njBrazilbrCroatiahrBelgiumbeMadagascarmgGeorgiageLuxembourgluGreenlandglKazakhstankzBelarusbyCzechiaczSouth AfricazaChinacnNorth Koreakp
Methodology Radar (overlay)
Overall
| Methodology | us-mi | kp |
|---|---|---|
| Voting method | Paper + scan | Paper only |
| Overall | 36.8% | 4.3% |
| EAdI Election Administration Index | 20.6% | 18.2% |
| EAI Electoral Access Index | 50.0% | 4.0% |
| ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index | 55.6% | — |
| EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index | 59.1% | 0.0% |
| EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index | 16.7% | — |
| EII Election Integrity Index | 26.4% | 1.9% |
Dimensions (per methodology)
EAdI Election Administration Index
| Dimension | us-mi | kp |
|---|---|---|
| Accountability | 50% | 0% |
| Commission | 0% | 40% |
| Funding | 0% | 0% |
| Staff Training | 50% | — |
| Vendor Oversight | 33% | 0% |
EAI Electoral Access Index
| Dimension | us-mi | kp |
|---|---|---|
| Administration | 0% | 0% |
| Eligibility | 40% | 20% |
| Identification | 50% | 0% |
| Registration | 71% | 0% |
| Roll Integrity | 0% | 0% |
| Voter Assistance | 17% | 0% |
| Voting Methods | 67% | 0% |
ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index
| Dimension | us-mi | kp |
|---|---|---|
| Contributions | 100% | — |
| Disclosure | 80% | — |
| Enforcement | 50% | — |
| Foreign Source | 25% | — |
| Traceability | 0% | — |
EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index
| Dimension | us-mi | kp |
|---|---|---|
| Contest | 40% | 0% |
| Recount | 88% | — |
| Timing | 50% | — |
EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index
| Dimension | us-mi | kp |
|---|---|---|
| Ballot Info | 0% | — |
| Candidate | 50% | — |
| Notification | 0% | — |
EII Election Integrity Index
| Dimension | us-mi | kp |
|---|---|---|
| Citizen Verifiability | 13% | 0% |
| Custody Hardware | 25% | 0% |
| Post Election Audit | 22% | 0% |
| Software Verifiability | 22% | 0% |
| Transparency Observation | 13% | 0% |
| Vendor Independence | 25% | 0% |
| Voter Access | 71% | 14% |
Phase 3 will replace these dense tables with overlaid radar charts and a datapoint heatmap.