EDRIElection Dispute Resolution Index
How robust are mechanisms to resolve election disputes?
Dimensions
Contest
100.0% · 5/5| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONT.EDRI.1Standing enumeratedAre the parties with standing to contest an election (candidate, party, qualified voters of the precinct, AG, etc.) enumerated in statute? | 1/1100.0% | § 13-36-101 enumerates standing — any elector with the right to vote for the office may contest a nomination or election — together with the grounds of contest (material law violation, candidate ineligibility, illegal or fraudulently counted votes). “An elector may contest the right of any person to any nomination or election to public office for which the elector has the right to vote” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| CONT.EDRI.2Venue & jurisdictionIs the court of original jurisdiction for election contests specified by statute? | 1/1100.0% | § 13-36-103 ('Court Having Jurisdiction of Proceedings') and § 13-36-102 specify the venue for an election contest — application is made to the district court in the county where the contest is to be had. | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| CONT.EDRI.3Filing deadlineIs the deadline for filing an election contest (days after certification, or after a defined event) specified by statute? | 1/1100.0% | § 13-36-102 sets the filing deadline — a contest must be commenced within five days of the candidate's certification, by written notice to the contestee and application to the district court. “Five days or less after a candidate has been certified as nominated, a person wishing to contest the nomination to any public office shall give notice in writing” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| CONT.EDRI.4Standard of proof & evidenceAre the standard of proof and admissibility rules for election-contest evidence codified in statute? | 2/2100.0% | § 13-36-202 codifies pleading and evidence rules for contests grounded on illegal votes — including that testimony of illegal votes is not received unless the party gives advance notice — § 13-36-207 governs the production of evidence at the hearing, and § 13-36-211 sets the standard for setting aside a result. Standard plus evidentiary rules; level 2. “When the reception of illegal votes is alleged as a cause of contest, it is sufficient to state generally” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
Recount
87.5% · 4/4| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| RECT.1Statutory recount procedureAre recount procedures (who counts, how, with what evidence) defined in statute, not regulation or administrative directive? | 1/1100.0% | § 13-16-412 codifies the recount procedure — the election administrator delivers the sealed ballot packages to the county recount board, which opens them and manually counts the votes on each ballot onto prepared tally sheets. “the board shall count the votes on each ballot manually” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| RECT.2Recount triggers enumeratedAre the triggers for an automatic or petition-based recount enumerated in statute (margin thresholds, sworn challenge, etc.)? | 1/1100.0% | § 13-16-201 enumerates the recount triggers — a recount must be conducted on a verified petition where the margin does not exceed 1/4 of 1% (or 10 votes for local offices); § 13-16-211 allows a bonded recount up to a 1/2 of 1% margin. “is defeated by a margin not exceeding 1/4 of 1% of the total votes cast or by a margin not exceeding 10 votes” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| RECT.3Recount cost allocationIs the cost of a petition-based recount allocated by statute (who pays under what outcome)? | 1/1100.0% | § 13-16-307 allocates recount cost by outcome — the applicant deposits the estimated cost, which is returned if the recount shows the applicant was elected (or reverses a ballot issue) and forfeited toward the excess cost if it does not; § 13-16-205 makes a margin-triggered recount a county charge. “If the recount shows that an applicant has been elected to office, the deposit of the applicant must be returned to the applicant.” | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| RECT.4Recount-finding effectAre the legal effects of a recount finding (binding, advisory, mandatory amendment) codified in statute? | 0.5/150.0% | § 13-16-304 has the district court retain jurisdiction of a recount case 'until the cause is finally determined and the final count is made by the county recount board', and § 13-16-416 has the recount board enter the corrected result; the surfaced section addresses jurisdiction rather than squarely codifying the binding force of a recount finding. | § view source 2026-05-22 |
Timing
25.0% · 1/2| Datapoint | Score | Rationale & evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIME.1Certification deadline in statuteIs the certification deadline (when the result becomes 'official') set by statute, not by administrative discretion? | 0.5/150.0% | Montana's results become official through the canvassing boards — § 13-15-405 has the county board declare and certify results, and the board of state canvassers must meet within 27 days of the election (§ 13-15-502); the surfaced county-certification section does not itself state a fixed day-count deadline. | § view source 2026-05-22 |
| TIME.2Pre-certification stayDoes statute provide a mechanism to stay certification while a recount or contest is pending? | 0/10.0% | No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Montana conducts recounts and election contests after the official canvass — a recount petition is filed 'within 5 days after the official canvass' (§ 13-16-201) and a contest within five days of certification (§ 13-36-102) — so there is no mechanism to stay certification while a recount or contest is pending. | § view source 2026-05-22 |