Mississippievci-v0

EVCIElection Voter-Confidence Index

How well does the framework support voter confidence and audit?

Confidence25.0%2/6 · 6 datapoints · 3 dimensionsCompare across jurisdictions →

Dimensions

Ballot Info0.0%
0/2 · 2 datapoints
Candidate25.0%
1/2 · 2 datapoints
Notification50.0%
1/2 · 2 datapoints

Ballot Info

0.0% · 0/2
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
INFO.1Statutory ballot information pamphletIs there a statutory requirement to publish a voter pamphlet (or analog) with candidate and ballot-question information, with content and distribution defined?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This statute addresses sample/instruction ballots at polling places on election day—specifically ballots showing the voting machine layout. It does not establish a statutory requirement for a voter pamphlet or analog publication containing candidate and ballot-question information with defined content and distribution requirements. Sample ballots used at polling places for instruction purposes are distinct from comprehensive voter information pamphlets. The statute mandates the provision and form of sample ballots but does not codify pamphlet content requirements (e.g., candidate statements, ballot measure summaries) or distribution procedures (e.g., mailing to all voters, public availability timelines). Dual scholars would conclude this section addresses procedural aspects of polling-place materials, not a voter information pamphlet framework.

§ view source
2026-06-09
INFO.2Multilingual ballot requirementAre the triggers for multilingual ballots and voter materials set by statute (population thresholds, language-minority criteria)?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-09

Candidate

25.0% · 1/2
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
CAND.1Candidate-filing public accessAre candidate-filing documents (nominating petitions, eligibility certifications) required by statute to be publicly accessible within a defined time?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This statute addresses procedures for contesting a candidate's qualifications during the primary election process, including petition filing timelines, executive committee review, and judicial appeal mechanisms. However, it does not contain any requirements regarding public accessibility of candidate-filing documents (nominating petitions, eligibility certifications) or any defined timeline for making such documents publicly accessible. The statute focuses on the dispute resolution process rather than establishing transparency or accessibility requirements for candidate filing materials. CAND.1 requires statutory codification of public access to candidate-filing documents within a defined timeframe; this section does not address that criterion.

§ view source
2026-06-09
CAND.2Candidate disqualification publicationIf a candidate is disqualified or withdraws after the ballot is printed, is the public-notice procedure codified in statute?0.5/150.0%

The statute codifies a notification procedure for candidate withdrawal after ballot approval (§ 23-15-295), specifying that executive committee officials must promptly notify affected county committees. However, the criterion asks about 'public-notice procedure,' and this statute only mandates internal notification to county executive committees, not a procedure for notifying the general public. The statute addresses withdrawal before printing and internal coordination after printing, but does not explicitly codify a public-notice mechanism for informing voters about disqualifications or withdrawals after ballots are printed. The phrase 'forthwith notify' provides timing language but targets institutional actors, not voters.

§ view source
2026-06-09

Notification

50.0% · 1/2
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
NOTIF.1Pre-election notice in statuteIs the requirement to notify voters of an upcoming election (date, polling place, registration deadline) set in statute with timing and content defined?1/1100.0%

The statute codifies a pre-election notification requirement with clearly defined timing and content delivery methods. The requirement specifies: (1) timing—notice published three successive weeks with first notice at least 30 days before election, and posted notices at least 21 days prior; (2) content method—newspaper publication and posting at three public places including city/town/village hall; (3) election date is established in the governing authority's order and is between 30-45 days after order adoption. The section establishes when elections occur (subsection 2) and mandates specific notice procedures with temporal requirements. While the statute does not explicitly enumerate every detail (such as polling place locations in this specific section), it establishes the notification framework, timing requirements, and delivery methods in statute.

§ view source
2026-06-09
NOTIF.2Polling-place change noticeIf a voter's polling place changes between elections, is there a statutory requirement to provide individual notice within a defined timeframe?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section (Miss. Code § 23-15-531.1) addresses minimum technical requirements for DRE (Direct Recording Electronic) voting systems, including voter verification, accessibility, and audit capacity. It does not contain any provisions related to polling-place change notifications, voter notification timelines, or procedures for informing voters of changes to their polling locations. The section is entirely focused on the mechanical and functional specifications of voting machines, not on voter communication or notification procedures. It therefore does not satisfy CRITERION CODE NOTIF.2, which requires statutory requirements for individual notice of polling-place changes within a defined timeframe.

§ view source
2026-06-09

Other methodologies for Mississippi